68,798 research outputs found
Natural hazard risk report for Tillamook County, Oregon, including the cities of Bay City, Garibaldi, Manzanita, Nehalem, Rockaway Beach, Tillamook, and Wheeler and the unincorporated communities of Neskowin, Oceanside, Netarts, and Pacific City
No full textby Matt C. Williams, Christina A. Appleby, John M. Bauer, and Jed T. Roberts.Title from PDF title page (viewed on September 10, 2020).This archived document is maintained by the State Library of Oregon as part of the Oregon Documents Depository Program. It is for informational purposes and may not be suitable for legal purposes.Includes bibliographical references (pages 45-47).Mode of access: Internet from the Oregon Government Publications Collection.Text in English
Training valence, instrumentality, and expectancy scale (T-VIES-it): Factor structure and nomological network in an Italian sample
No full textPurpose - The purpose of this study is to validate, in an Italian sample, a multidimensional training motivation measure (T-VIES-it) based on expectancy (VIE) theory, and to examine the nomological network surrounding the construct.Design/methodology/approach - Using a cross-sectional design study, 258 public sector employees in Northeast Italy (participating in a range of employer-sponsored training programs) filled out the T-VIES-it and questionnaires on goal orientation, job support for learning, and intention to transfer learning gained through training to the workplace. To validate the T-VIES-it and test its nomological network confirmatory factor analysis and structural equations models were used. Findings - Results showed acceptable confirmatory factor analysis fit indices and psychometric properties of the T-VIES-it. Acceptable fit indexes were also found for the structural equations models tested. The modified model showed significant relations between learning goal orientation and the three dimensions of training motivation; and between the expectancy subscale and job support and intention to transfer.Originality/value - The paper highlights that the T-VIES-it is a validated multidimensional assessment of training motivation, and the first its kind in Italian. The scale should provide value in training evaluations and in research related to training motivation
Earthquake and tsunami impact analysis of five Oregon coastal communities
No full textReport -- Spreadsheet.by John M. Bauer, Jonathan C. Allan, Laura L. S. Gabel, Fletcher E. O'Brien, and Jed T. Roberts.Title from PDF cover (viewed on July 7, 2020).This archived document is maintained by the State Library of Oregon as part of the Oregon Documents Depository Program. It is for informational purposes and may not be suitable for legal purposes.Includes bibliographical references.Mode of access: Internet from the Oregon Government Publications Collection.Text in English
Элементы техники полива прерывистого дождевания машиной Bauer Rainstar T–61
No full textIn the article presented results of researches on studying the structure of artificial intermittent rain, when watering mobile drum-hose sprinkler machine Bauer Rainstar T–61. Determined that the rain created irrigation machine meets all the agrotechnical requirements. The average drop diameter of 1.2 mm Coefficient of effective irrigation equal to 0,8 at wind speed 0...1,0 m/s
Bauer, John T. (Birth, 1900-09-05)
No full textAddress: 544 York4007/Pg. 29/1900/M W/Cinti/Cinti/Mrs. E. HotelOriginal record filed in drawer labeled 'BATES-BAUER,V'
Unrevealing the real pigment composition of green tattoo inks
No full textSince losing their maverick image, tattoos are no longer fringe groups markings, but a widespread
practice with estimated 120 million people tattooed worldwide in 20161. This poses problems of
safety of the materials injected under the skin. In spite of a foreseeable concern, no uniform regulation
has been put in place to monitor the inks composition, determine the potential risks for human health
and consequently restrict, whether necessary, the use of specific inks. There are indications on this
issue by the ResAP(2008)12, dealing with cosmetics, and safety of the tattooing procedure, which
were accepted in few countries in Europe, and largely neglected by the others. Meantime, new
indications are being proposed by the Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC- Nov.2018)3 and the
Committee for Socio-Economic Analysis (SEAC- also Nov.2018)3. In this overall scenario, aiming
at tackling tattoo inks safety, the first issue to address is their actual composition. Inks can be
considered as roughly being composed of a pigment, imparting the colour, and a vehicle, ensuring
the ink fluidity and asepticity. We selected green inks and performed multiple-techniques
investigations to determine the actual pigment composition. In all of them, PG36, a hexabrominedecachlorine Cu-phthalocyanine was indicated as pigment both on the bottle labels and on the safety
sheets, and PG7, a hexadecachlorine Cu-phthalocyanine was found, instead, which is restricted in
countries where legislation on tattoo inks is enforced4. More false declarations on ink compositions
were found, also for additional pigments in the inks, even if none of them is restricted4. Whitening
agents such as TiO2 nanoparticles may be present, but in this case, additional dispersing agent, with
non-negligible Al and Si content were not declared. Issues on TiO2 nanoparticles size are also to be
considered for their potential cytotoxic aspect4.
___________
[1] S. Everts, Chemical and Engineering News, American Chemical Society,
[2] Council of Europe Resolution ResAp(2008)1 on requirements and criteria for the safety of tattoos and permanent
make-up Feb. 20th 2008.
[3] Compiled RAC and SEAC Opinion on an Annex XV dossier proposing restrictions on substances used in tattoo
inks and permanent make-up ECHA/RAC/RES-O-0000001412-86-240/F, ECHA/SEAC/ ECHA/SEAC/RES-O0000001412-86-265/F, https://echa.europa.eu/it/registry-of-restriction-intentions/-/dislist/details/0b0236e180dff62a
[4] E.M. Bauer, T. De Caro, P. Tagliatesta, M. Carbone, Dyes and Pigments 2019, 167, 225-235
Bauer (Birth, 1887-04-17)
No full textAddress: S. W. Cor Queen City & Harrison2481/Pg. 59/1887/M W/Am./Am./Dr. T. E. TaggertOriginal record filed in drawer labeled 'BATES-BAUER,V'
Goggia incognita Bauer 2017, sp. nov.
No full textGoggia incognita sp. nov. (Figs. 1 C, 1D, 4, 5A) Diplodactylus lineatus (part) Gray, 1845 Phyllodactylus lineatus (part) Smith, 1849 Phyllodactylus lineatus lineatus (part) Hewitt, 1937 Goggia lineata (part) Bauer, Good, and Branch, 1997 Holotype. CAS 224024: adult male. South Africa, Western Cape, Jacobsbaai (32° 59' 19" S, 17° 52' 37" E). Collected by A. M. Bauer, R. A. Sadlier, A. Whiting, 9 September 2001. Paratypes. CAS 224022 (adult female), CAS 224023 (adult female): same data as holotype. CAS 176047 (adult female): Same locality as holotype. Collected by A. M. Bauer, 23 May 1990. CAS 206692 (adult male), CAS 206697 (adult female): Same locality as holotype. Collected by A. M. Bauer, A. C. Lamb, J. L. Wright, P. Moler, R. D. Babb, 11 July 1998. MCZ R-192442 (adult female): South Africa, Western Cape, Mauritzbaai (32° 58' 39.8" S, 17° 52' 51.9" E). Collected by M. P. Heinicke, A. M. Bauer, T. Gamble, D. Zarkower, J. Marais, A. Kuhn, E. Frietas, R. Skinner, 2 August 2013. MCZ R 192395 (adult females), MCZ R-194417 (adult male): South Africa, Western Cape, 1 km S Jacobsbaai (32° 59´19.1´´ S 17° 52´36´´ E). Collected by M. P. Heinicke, A. M. Bauer, T. Gamble, D. Zarkower, J. Marais, A. Kuhn, E. Frietas, R. Skinner, 24 July 2013. MCZ R-192446 (subadult male), MCZ R-194450 (adult male): South Africa, Western Cape, 4.3 km S Jacobsbaai (33° 0´20.9´´ S, 17° 52´46.5´´ E). Collected by M. P. Heinicke, A. M. Bauer, T. Gamble, D. Zarkower, J. Marais, A. Kuhn, E. Frietas, R. Skinner, 2 August 2013. Referred Specimens. See Branch et al. (1995): all specimens listed as Goggia lineata from south of 31° S. Etymology. The specific epithet is from the Latin word incognitus, meaning “not known”. The English phrase “going incognito” refers to remaining hidden or disguised. The name is chosen to reflect the 150+ year time period in which this species has remained hidden within what were considered nominotypical populations of Goggia lineata. It additionally reflects the natural history of the species, as members of the species are typically inconspicuous and hidden under cover objects by day. The name is used as an adjective. Diagnosis. A small-bodied Goggia, snout-vent length to 28.58 mm. Body form is cylindrical, with a deep head and short, rounded snout. The rostral scale bears a median cleft, and snout scales are relatively large and domed, with 8–10 rows of scales between the rostral and the anterior margin of the orbits. Dorsal scalation is homogenous, consisting of uniform flattened subimbricate scales, grading to clearly imbricate on the venter. Midbody scale rows number 73–81. Digits bear a single pair of subdigital scansors (“leaf toes”) enclosing a small claw. Males typically have five precloacal pores. Typical color pattern consists of a gray background overlain with a series of small, often unnoticeable pale spots with dark anterior margins that typically fuse to form a series of scallops or chevrons. Some individuals additionally bear four dark longitudinal stripes, which in this species are always connected by the aforementioned scallops. The combination of leaf toes, atuberculate dorsal scalation, and cleft rostral distinguishes this species from all non- Goggia geckos in southern Africa. Goggia incognita sp. nov. can be distinguished from G. microlepidota based on its much smaller body size (maximum SVL 29 mm in G. incognita sp. nov. vs. 67 mm in G. microlepidota). All small-bodied Goggia except for G. lineata can be easily distinguished from G. incognita sp. nov. based on color pattern: in G. braacki, G. essexi, G. hewitti, and G. hexapora, the pale spots and dark pattern elements form a clear reticulated pattern. In G. gemmula and G. rupicola (including “ rupicola ” from Kliprand described as another new species below), the pale spots are large and are yellow or orange rather than white or cream. In addition to color pattern, G. braacki and G. hewitti differ from G. incognita sp. nov. in being largerbodied (SVL to 35 mm in G. braacki, 37 mm in G. hewitti), having only four precloacal pores in males, and in having more midbody scale rows (usually more than 80). Goggia essexi, G. gemmula, G. rupicola, and G. “ rupicola ” also have only four precloacal pores in males; G. essexi, G. rupicola, and G. “ rupicola ” also have flattened bodies and typically more than 80 midbody scale rows, whereas G. gemmula has a more elongate body than G. incognita sp. nov. Goggia hexapora usually has six precloacal pores in males and more than 80 midbody scale rows. Goggia lineata is the species most similar to G. incognita sp. nov., but can be distinguished as having a color pattern typically dominated by bold longitudinal stripes (Fig. 1), and having smaller, flatter scales on the head, with 11 or more rows between the rostral and the anterior margin of the orbits, vs. 8–10 in G. incognita sp. nov. (Fig. 5). Description of the holotype. Adult male. SVL 26.62 mm. Body cylindrical, trunk not elongate (AGL/SVL ratio = 0.45). Head deep, not dorsoventrally flattened (HW/HD ratio = 1.75); snout rounded, about twice the diameter of the orbit. Lores inflated, interorbital region slightly concave. Ear opening is small, obliquely rounded, and without a tympanic shield. The rostral is subpentagonal with a median cleft, and the rostral along with the first supralabial and three nasals enter the nostril. The largest nasal borders the rostral. The nasorostrals are separated by a single granule. Supralabials number 7/6 (R/L), infralabials 6/6 (R/L); the mental is subpentagular with a shallow apex and is bordered by two enlarged chin shields, which are in turn bordered by six smaller granules. The snout is short, and snout granules are noticeably enlarged, rounded, and more domed than scales elsewhere on the head; there are eight rows of scales from the rostral to the level of the anterior edge of the orbit, and eight granules from the nostril to the anterior edge of the orbit. Scales on the crown are smaller and flatter, with 15 granules separating the anterior margins of the orbits. Dorsum covered by uniform, smooth, flat subimbricate scales, with subimbrication resulting in rhomboid appearance to the scalation; the grade to larger, smooth, imbricate scales on the belly which are hexagonal in shape and may have denticulate edges. At midbody are 78 scale rows. Five precloacal pores are present anterior to the cloaca, and three enlarged tuberculate scales (cloacal spurs) are present on either side at the tail base along the hemipenial bulges. The limbs are relatively short (FL/SVL ratio = 0.15), covered in uniform, subimbricate or imbricate granules, with the median series slightly broader than lateral scale series. The toe tips are rounded with small expansions bearing a pair of large, rectangular scansors (toe pads) between which is a small claw. The tail is cylindrical, tapering, regenerated. Original portion of the tail measures 3.88 mm; the regenerated portion is an additional 14.99 mm. The unregenerated portion of the tail is covered above with regular rows of uniform, smooth granules, whereas the ventral surface has larger, flatter imbricate scales. The regenerated portion of the tail is entirely covered in large imbricate scales. Coloration. In preservative, the dorsum is gray-brown in color. Barely perceptible dark temporal lines extend from the eyes above the ears to the nape. On the dorsum, a series of faded dark scallops extend transversely across the dorsum, the dark scallop on the unbroken portion of the tail being least faded. Neither pale spots nor longitudinal stripes are visible. The regenerated tail is more brown and less gray than the remainder of the body. Ventrally, the body is immaculate and cream-colored. In life, the ground color is gray without brown infusion. The pattern is as in preservative, with dark temporal lines above the ears and a series of transverse scallops of the dorsum, but is much more obvious and not faded. The venter remains cream-colored, and the regenerated tail is more brownish than the remainder of the body. Variation. Scale counts in the paratype series show minor variation compared to the holotype (Table 4). Chin shields sometimes three instead of two in MCZ R-192442 and CAS 224023. The number of granules bordering the chin shields varies from 5–7 (mean = 6.27). In specimens MCZ R-192395, MCZ-R192442, and MCZ R-194450, two granules separate the nasorostrals instead of one. The size of the granules on the head varies slightly, with 7–9 granules between the nostrils and the anterior orbit margin (mean = 8.27), 12–16 granules across the crown at the anterior margin of the orbit (mean = 14.6), and 8–10 granules from the rostral to the anterior margin of the orbit (mean = 9). Midbody scale rows vary from 73–81 (mean = 76.5). Coloration in the paratypes is similar to the holotype, but in some individuals more noticeable longitudinal stripes are present, or the dark scallops are arranged such that both transverse and longitudinal patterns are formed. Distribution and Natural History. Goggia incognita sp. nov. is endemic to South Africa, being known from much of the western part of Western Cape Province, with additional records from further east in the Little Karoo and Karoo, also in Western Cape Province. The distribution of this species comprises what was formerly considered the southern half of the distribution of G. lineata. The boundary between the two species appears to be at the Knersvlakte, a quartz plain lying between the Cape Fynbos and Little Namaqualand ecoregions, near the border between the Western Cape and Northern Cape provinces, with G. incognita sp. nov. occurring only to the south in the Cape (Fig. 2). Many references to the ecology and natural history of Goggia lineata in both the technical and popular literature actually refer to G. incognita sp. nov., and the two species are ecologically similar. Goggia incognita sp. nov. is a terrestrial, nocturnal species that shelters by day under a wide range of available debris, including under stones, in plant litter, and under or within dead Aloe stems (Branch & Bauer 1995, Branch & Braack 1989, Branch 1998). At the type locality, along the coast, individuals may be encountered both under boulders and under strand debris. At Farm Buffelskloof, in the Little Karoo, no individuals were found sheltering under the local conglomerate rock, but one individual was found inside a dead Aloe. Regenerated tails are very common in this species, and individuals also often autotomize their tails when handled even if the tail is not grasped, suggesting that tail autotomy is a frequently employed defense mechanism. Gecko species found syntopically with G. incognita sp. nov. (and potentially under identical cover objects) include Afrogecko porphyreus and Pachydactylus geitje near Jacobsbaai and Goggia hewitti and Pachydactylus geitje at Farm Buffleskloof.Published as part of Bauer, Aaron M., 2017, Molecular phylogeny reveals strong biogeographic signal and two new species in a Cape Biodiversity Hotspot endemic mini-radiation, the pygmy geckos (Gekkonidae: Goggia), pp. 449-470 in Zootaxa 4312 (3) on pages 458-461, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4312.3.3, http://zenodo.org/record/85572
Bauer, Frank (Death, 1890-03-19)
No full textAddress: 70 Bogen St.Age at death: 2 Yrs.353/Pg 35/1890/M W S/City/Dr. J. H. Femmen/T. M. Westerman/St. Joseph OldOriginal record filed in drawer labeled 'BATES-BAUER,V'
Bauer, Catharine (Death, 1871-06-07)
No full textAddress: Lock & SmithAge at death: 33Pg 154/1871/95/F W M/Germany/Dr. T. M. Reade/Hack & Dust/Lane Sem.Original record filed in drawer labeled 'BATES-BAUER,V'
- …
