1,720,954 research outputs found
Radiofrequency ablation of the diseased human left ventricle
No full textBackground: predictors of effective ablation lesion delivery in the human left ventricle are not established, particularly in scar. Impedance drop and electrogram (EGM) attenuation are potential surrogates to assess this.Objectives: this study sought to establish the relationships between ablation index (AI) and force-time integral (FTI) with impedance drop and EGM attenuation in the human left ventricle.Methods: patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation were recruited. EGMs were collected preablation and postablation, with impedance, AI, and FTI measured during. Based on preablation bipolar voltage, myocardium was adjudged a low-voltage myocardium (LVM) (1.50 mV). Relationships between these parameters were explored.Results: a total of 402 ablations were analyzed in 15 patients. The percent impedance drop correlated with AI and FTI (P < 0.0005; repeated-measures correlation coefficient: 0.54 and 0.44, respectively), a relationship that became weaker with increased myocardial fibrosis, (repeated-measures correlation coefficient for NVM, IVM, and LVM, AI: 0.67, 0.60, and 0.52, respectively; FTI: 0.59, 0.51, and 0.42, respectively). The curve between AI/FTI and impedance drop plateaued at 763 AI and 713 gram-seconds, an impedance drop of 7.5%. Shallower curves occurred progressively from NVM to LVM (P < 0.0005). Mixed models demonstrated that AI and FTI had a greater effect on impedance drop than myocardial fibrosis, drift, or orientation, (standardized β: 0.54 and 0.48, respectively). EGMs were attenuated with ablation (29.3%; IQR: 4.4%-53.3%; P < 0.0005), but attenuation did not correlate with AI or FTI.Conclusions: on biophysical analysis, ablation beyond an AI of 763 and FTI of 713 gs offers minimal additional efficacy on average. Fibrosis blunts ablation efficacy. AI is a stronger correlate with impedance drop than FTI. EGM attenuation does not correlate with ablation parameters. (Late Potentials and Ablation Index in Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation; NCT03437408
Comparison of voltages between atria: differences in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation
No full textBackground: ultra high-density mapping systems allow for comparison of atrial electroanatomical maps in unprecedented detail. Atrial scar determined by voltages and surface area between atria, rhythm and atrial fibrillation (AF) types was assessed.Methods: left (LA) and right atrial (RA) maps were created using Rhythmia HDx in patients listed for ablation for paroxysmal (PAF, sinus rhythm (SR) maps only) or persistent AF (PeAF, AF and SR maps). Electrograms on corresponding SR/AF maps were paired for direct comparison. Percentage surface area of scar was assigned low- (LVM, ≤ 0.05 mV), intermediate- (IVM, 0.05–0.5 mV) or normal voltage myocardium, (NVM, > 0.5 mV).Results: thirty-eight patients were recruited generating 96 maps using 913,480 electrograms. Paired SR-AF bipolar electrograms showed fair correlation in LA (Spearman’s ρ = 0.32) and weak correlation in RA (ρ = 0.19) and were significantly higher in SR in both (LA: 0.61 mV (0.20–1.67) vs 0.31 mV (0.10–0.74), RA: 0.68 mV (0.19–1.88) vs 0.47 mV (0.14–1.07), p Significantly more IVM/LVM surface areas were seen in AF over SR (LA only, p Conclusions: ultra high-density mapping shows paired electrograms correlate poorly between SR and AF. SR electrograms are typically (but not always) larger than those in AF. Patients with PeAF have a lower global electrogram voltage than those with PAF. Electrogram voltages are similar between atria within individual patients
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
