1,720,954 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Towards the utility of a wider range of evidence in the derivation of Sharīʿa precepts : paradigm shift in contemporary Usūlī epistemology
Get PDFThe fundamental distinction made in Shiite legal epistemology is that between
qaṭʿ (certainty) and ẓann (conjecture). Contemporary Uṣūlī epistemology
maintains that in the juristic process of the derivation of Sharīʿa precepts, a
mujtahid is prohibited to use any evidence that gives rise to mere ẓann. Rather,
he must only use evidence that gives qaṭʿ of Sharīʿa precepts. Furthermore, this
discourse distinctly argues that a mujtahid can also derive knowledge of
Sharīʿa precepts through the ẓann al-khāṣ (especial conjecture) that is
emanated from evidence that is ẓannī (conjectural) by nature but is
substantiated by the Divine Lawgiver Himself through other qaṭʿī (certainty bearing)
evidence. This understanding effectively curtails the derivation of
Sharīʿa precepts to only the textual evidence of the Qurʾān and sunna, and in
the present day this textualist dependency can be criticised for contributing
towards the gulf that exists between traditional Shiite jurisprudence and
matters that are pertinent to contemporary societies.
In light of this, this study critically analyses the contemporary discourse of
Uṣūlī epistemology and explores whether it has the potential to legitimise the
epistemic validity and utility of a wider range of evidence in the juristic
process of deriving Sharīʿa precepts. It essentially focuses on the strength and
rigour of the epistemological underpinnings that are maintained in Uṣūlī legal
theory, and by highlighting that these underpinnings and the underlying
epistemic assumptions that are prevalent in contemporary Uṣūlī legal
epistemology are rationally derived, this study explains how and why the
Uṣūlīs have been led to rationally give preference to textual evidence over nontextual
evidence. This study concludes that Uṣūlī legal theory has the potential
to, and moreover is required to, undergo an epistemological paradigm shift that
permits the acceptance of the epistemic validity of a wider range of evidence,
other than just those that emanate qaṭʿ or ẓann al-khāṣ
Recommended from our members
Exploring the mind of God ::an introduction to Shi'ite legal epistemology /
No full text"This book introduces readers to the legal epistemology that is advocated within Twelver Shi'ite usul al-fiqh (legal theory). It critically surveys the epistemological underpinnings upheld by post-19th century Uq̣ūlīclerics that impel them to mainly deduce and interpret Sharia using scripture and literalist hermeneutical methods. An evaluation of these underpinnings uncovers the important juxtaposition that exists between the seminarian discourses of usul al-fiqh and philosophy. The book hypothesises that usul al-fiqh has both space and historical precedence to accept alternative epistemological theories that may enable orthodox Shi'ite clerics to display greater dynamism in deducing and interpreting Sharia"-
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
