12,871 research outputs found
Informazione e mercato
No full textIl capitolo esamina lo statuto giuridico della pubblicità commerciale e del diritto d'autore con annesse sfide e problematiche regolamentari nell'epoca dell'information societ
Libertà di espressione e diritti della personalità nell’era digitale. La tutela della privacy nella dimensione europea
No full textIl capitolo è dedicato all'approfondimento del rapporto tra libertà di espressione e protezione dei dati personali nell'era digital
Il diritto all'oblio
No full textIl volume, scritto per una delle case editricei (Mondadori Le Monnier) a più larga diffusione, non solo italiana, declina la tutela dei diritti fondamentali e delle libertà costituzionale alla luce dell'impatto delle nuove tecnologie, ed in particolare di Internet. Una sorta di commentario alla Cosituzione 2.
From private enforcement to public enforcement. Copyright enforcement in the digital age: a comparative overview
No full textThe book chapter articulates a comparative overview on the various administrative models of enforcement of copyright in the digital sphere implemented in Italy and Franc
Mambo Italiano: the perilous Italian way to ISP liability
No full textThis chapter critically explores the current state-of-the-art in Italy regarding the liability of Internet service providers. It presents an overview of the three main phases which the author identifies in the case law of national courts. Particularly, the contribution looks at the implementation of the E-Commerce Directive into the Italian legal order and addresses some criticisms regarding the vagueness of some of the relevant domestic provisions. It also analyzes the significance attached to the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union focusing on ISP liability, which has led some Italian courts to develop a new instrument with what I claim are no firm legal foundations: the so called ‘active’ hosting provider. The essay then draws up a map of the attitudes which ordinary courts afforded toward this interpretative option, most notably prior to the Supreme Court endorsement of the ‘active’ hosting provider avenue in a 2019 landmark judgment. Finally, I argue that such interpretation goes against legal certainty, leavening very unclear the conditions under which the legal regime enshrined in the E-Commerce Directive and national legislation is still applicable, ultimately undermining freedom of speech
Fundamental rights and private enforcement in the digital age
No full textThis article addresses the shift in the paradigm of fundamental rights protection on the Internet. More and morethe enforcement of such rights is being delegated to private Internet operators, and the urgent question is how the task of balancing conflicting rights affects the status of Internet Service Providers (ISPs). The article examines the increasing privatisation of fundamental rights enforcementon the Internet, highlighting the impact of this trend. Following the analysisof recent developments, it argues that the pillars governing ISP liability should not be altered. In particular, the early determination that ISPs should not be presumptively saddled with content monitoring tasks should not be called into question. Therefore, the regulatory pressure on ISPs shouldbe lowered, as the spectre of liability, combined with ISPs' increasing role indeciding the proper balance between conflicting rights, unduly burdens the activity of ISPs and generates incentives to delete even lawful content
Commercial, but Legitimate Interest: The Court of Justice Calls the Dutch Data Protection Authority to Order
No full textThe ECJ's decision in Koninklijke Nederlandse Lawn Tennisbond v Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens clarifies the interpretation of 'legitimate interest' under Article 6(1)(f) of the GDPR. The Court found that a purely commercial interest can constitute a legitimate interest, provided that it is lawful and balanced against the rights of data subjects. This directly challenges the restrictive position of the Dutch DPA, which excluded commercial purposes from the scope of legitimate interests. The judgment emphasises that legitimacy does not require a legal basis enshrined in law, but must satisfy the three-part test of legitimate interest. It also highlights the importance of the other two conditions of the test, namely the expectations of data subjects and the absence of less intrusive alternatives. The judgment is an important step towards harmonising the application of the GDPR across Member States, particularly when it comes to balancing commercial interests with the protection of personal data
Speech without a Speaker: Constitutional Coverage for Generative AI Output?
No full textGenerative AI systems' output as speech - Constitutional coverage for AI speech in the absence of a (human) speaker - Right of individuals to receive information as a perspective for framing constitutional coverage of generative AI output - Implications of constitutional coverage for content policing and content moderation by private platforms - Trends in the interpretation of existing content moderation regimes and their applicability to generative AI systems
DeepSeek, or OpenAI Reloaded? An ‘Italian-Style Approach’ in Tackling Data Protection in Generative AI
No full textThe case note reports on the Italian Data Protection Authority's order imposing a temporary ban on the operation of the Deepseek service in Ital
- …
