1,721,104 research outputs found
Renal amyloidoses
No full textRenal amyloidoses are a group of rare misfolding protein diseases caused by the deposition of a precursor protein in the kidney as insoluble amyloid fibrils, causing renal damage and dysfunction that can progress to end-stage renal failure requiring dialysis. This heterogeneous group includes commoner diseases as light chain (AL) and reactive (AA) amyloidosis as well as rarer entities as hereditary renal amyloidosis. Differential diagnosis is mandatory to avoid therapeutic errors and requires amyloid typing on tissue biopsy and, in selected cases, DNA analysis. In AL and AA amyloidosis, biomarkers are well-established tools that help clinicians in diagnosis, prognosis assessment and evaluation of treatment efficacy, highlighting the important role of the clinical laboratory in the management of these rare diseases. In AL amyloidosis, the identification of the monoclonal protein requires the combination of electrophoresis, immunofixation of both serum and urine, and serum free light chain (FLC) assessment. Severity of renal involvement and risk of progression to dialysis are predicted at diagnosis by 24h-proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Treatment efficacy is assessed with monoclonal protein studies, including serum FLC measurement; hematologic response can result in improvement of renal damage, evaluated by improvements in 24h-proteinuria and eGFR from baseline. In AA amyloidosis, a periodical evaluation of serum amyloid A (SAA) serum concentration reflects the activity of the underlying inflammatory disease and evaluates the efficacy of treatment. The severity of renal involvement can be assessed at diagnosis with 24h-proteinuria and eGFR. Only few data on prognostic markers are available on other types of renal amyloidosis
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Novel challenges in the management of immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: from the bench to the bedside
No full textIntroduction: Immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis is one of the most frequent systemic amyloidosis in Western countries. It is caused by a B-cell clone producing a misfolded light chain (LC) that deposits in organs. Areas covered: The review examines recent findings on pathophysiology and clinical management of AL amyloidosis. It contains an update on the recent hot topics as novel therapeutic approaches, definition of relapse, and hematologic response assessment. To review literature on AL amyloidosis, a bibliographic search was performed using PubMed. Expert opinion: Due to the proteotoxicity of amyloidogenic LCs, the therapeutic goal is a rapid and profound decrease in their concentration. The standard treatment is a risk-adapted chemotherapy targeting the B-cell clone. Novel, promising drugs, as daratumumab, are currently under evaluation in newly-diagnosed and relapsed/refractory patients. New sensitive techniques, as mass spectrometry approach and bone marrow minimal residual disease assessment, are available to evaluate depth of response. After first-line therapy, increase in LC concentration may precede worsening of organ dysfunction and should be considered carefully. Further clarification of molecular mechanisms of the disease are shedding light on new possible therapeutic targets. Innovative treatment strategies and novel technologies will improve our ability to treat AL amyloidosis, preventing organ deterioration
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
