1,721,052 research outputs found
The measurement of bulbar hyperemia: Challenges and pitfalls
No full textPurpose: To review methods of assessing bulbar redness, particularly with respect to the practicality of comparing different rating systems. Methods: The published literature was reviewed and discussed by a panel of experts and a narrative review prepared. Results: Bulbar hyperemia is a common clinical sign and an important indicator of ocular disease. As bulbar hyperemia is a frequent side effect of topical glaucoma medications, accurate objective measurement is important to allow comparison of clinical studies. A number of different measurement systems have evolved to allow quantification of subjectively assessed redness to be rendered into a form that allows between-treatment comparisons and longitudinal changes in both clinical research and practice. Whereas widespread use of imagebased rating scales has improved the assessment of bulbar redness in clinical practice and clinical research, these techniques are less than ideal. The scales are subject to an intrinsic subjectivity and are suboptimal in differentiating the physiologic phenomenon of bulbar hyperemia. There is also a degree of interobserver and intraobserver variation; in some studies, average variation in scores exceed half the extent of the whole scale. Moreover, a lack of interscale validation has led to confusion in comparing the results from clinical studies that use different scales. In a recent series of studies, cross-calibration between the various scales in use has been attempted. Conclusions: Whereas naive comparisons between the results obtained in studies using different bulbar redness scales can lead to erroneous conclusions, the tools exist to permit meaningful comparisons between rating systems and scales
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
In vitro flow properties of Preserflo Michroshunt with an intraluminal stent
No full textObjectives: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of varying stent sizes and materials on the outflow of the Preserflo Microshunt (PMS). Methods: In vitro experiments were conducted using five new PMS samples. Intraluminal stents of two materials (nylon and polypropylene) and two sizes (9-0 and 10-0) were tested. Flow was measured using a balanced saline solution (BSS) under a constant hydrostatic pressure, and the resistance was calculated. Theoretical calculations based on the Hagen-Poiseuille law were compared with in vitro results, and the results were corrected to calculate resistance to flow using aqueous humour properties. Five measurements were obtained for each material and size. Results: Without any stent, the median resistance internal to PMS corrected for aqueous humour viscosity was 1.59 mmHg/μL/min. Median resistances were 6.35 mmHg/μL/min (range: 3.88-7.42) for the 10-0 nylon and, 11.79 mmHg/μL/min (range: 7.08-13.71) for the 10-0 polypropylene. The 9-0 stents showed higher resistance: 10.99 mmHg/μL/min (range: 7.34-22.75) for 9-0 nylon, finally, the 9-0 polypropylene resulted in a resistance of 37.55 mmHg/μL/min (range: 36.52-38.41). Conclusions: This study indicates that the tested suture materials and sizes have a significant impact on the outflow resistance of the PMS device. Larger sutures and/or polypropylene materials seem to offer more resistance to aqueous outflow
Treatment Outcomes Using the PAUL Glaucoma Implant to Control Intraocular Pressure in Eyes with Refractory Glaucoma
No full textPurpose: To investigate efficacy 1 year after implantation of a novel glaucoma tube shunt, the PAUL Glaucoma Implant (PGI; Advanced Ophthalmic Innovations, Singapore, Republic of Singapore), in the treatment of eyes with refractory glaucoma. Design: Clinical trial. Participants: Glaucoma patients who are recalcitrant to maximum tolerated medical therapy and require tube shunt surgery. Methods: Interventional cohort study involving consecutive PGIs implanted at 6 international centers between December 1, 2017, and December 1, 2018. All the participants were followed up for 1 year after surgery. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measure was failure, defined prospectively as intraocular pressure (IOP) of more than 21 mmHg or less than 20% reduction from the preoperative baseline on 2 consecutive visits, 3 months or more after surgery; persistent late hypotony, defined as IOP of less than 6 mmHg on 2 consecutive visits after 3 months; additional glaucoma surgery; loss of light perception vision; or removal of the implant for any reason. Results: Of 82 patients enrolled, 74 (74 eyes) completed 12 months of follow-up. The mean age ± standard deviation at enrollment was 62.3±14.7 years, 73.0% were men, and 36.5% had secondary glaucoma. One year after surgery, 4 patients (5.4%) fulfilled the surgical criteria for failure, 68.9% (51/74 eyes) were deemed complete successes, and 93.2% (69/74 eyes) were considered qualified successes. Compared with the medicated preoperative IOP (23.1±8.2 mmHg), the postoperative IOPs at 6 and 12 months were 13.8±4.0 mmHg and 13.2±3.3 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.001). The mean number of IOP-lowering drugs used before surgery and after 12 months of follow-up were 3.3±0.9 and 0.3±0.6, respectively (P < 0.001). Significant postoperative complications included self-limiting shallow anterior chamber (n = 11; 14.9%), hypotony requiring intervention (n = 7; 9.5%), tube shunt occlusion (n = 5; 6.8%), tube exposure (n = 3; 4.1%), and endophthalmitis with resultant loss of vision (n = 1; 1.4%). Conclusions: The PGI demonstrated comparable efficacy with other currently available implants, with almost three quarters of the enrolled patients with refractory glaucoma achieving complete surgical success after 1 year of follow-up
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
