183,884 research outputs found
Forming moral community: Christian and ecclesial existence in the theology of Karl Barth 1915-1922
No full textThis thesis is an investigation of Karl Barth's theology in the turbulent and dynamic years of his nascent career: 1915 - 1922, with a special focus on the manner in which he construed Christian and ecclesial existence. The thesis argues that Karl Barth developed his theology with an explicit ecclesial and ethical motive, that is, he developed his theology as a deliberate attempt to shape the ethical life of the church in the context within which he lived and worked. It contends that criticisms suggesting that Barth does not have an ethics are inaccurate assessments of his work, and in fact, that although it is evident that his ethical thought continued to develop throughout his career, major trajectories of Barth's development are present in germinal form even at this early stage.
Following the lead and suggestion of John Webster, the thesis adopts a chronological and exegetical reading of Barth's work from his initial dispute with his liberal heritage circa 1915 until the publication of the second edition of his commentary on Romans. Materials examined from this period include sermons, lectures, book reviews, personal correspondence and biblical commentaries, with particular care being taken to identify the occasion and historical context within which Barth presented his thought. This reading seeks to uncover and present the development, structure, content and logic of Barth's own thought, in hope that the central concerns of this thesis will be validated. Examination of these materials has indeed shown that Barth developed his theology with an ecclesio-ethical motive.
The significance of this thesis is twofold. First, it contributes to broader understanding of Barth's theology both in its early development, and with regard to his ecclesiology and ethics. Second, it provides a significant framework and material for contemporary ecclesial reflection on its own identity and mission
Prüfende Anmerkungen zu der Herzliebschen Schrift: Ist ein allgemeiner Landes-Katechismus nöthig [et]c. : nebst der Gebhardschen in Berlin noch immer verpönten Gegenschrift: Prüfung der Gründe [et]c. ganz abgedruckt und ebenfalls mit Anmerkungen versehen; und endlich ein Auszug aus den darüber bei dem Königl. Preußischen Kammergericht, in dem merkwürdigen Ungerisch-Zöllnerschen Censur-Proceß verhandelten Acten / [Johann Matthäus Hassencamp]
No full textVerf. ermitteltAutopsie nach Ex. der ULB Sachsen-AnhaltVorlageform des Erscheinungsvermerks: Rinteln, Jn der Expedition der Theologischen Annalen. Leipzig, Jn Commißion bey Joh. Ambrosius Barth. 1792
... Pro consequendo gradu in utroque iure infrascriptas positiones, ex l. ut vim de iust. & iu. & c. cum contingat de iure iur. desumptas
No full textdisputandas & defendendas publice suscipiet. Christianus Barth Hallensis Saxonum, die XIIII. Augusti ...EinblattdruckEnthält 25 ThesenDiss. iur. Basel, 157
The theology of revelation and the epistemology of Christian belief : the compatibility and complementarity of the theological epistemologies of Karl Barth and Alvin Plantinga
No full textThis study brings Christian theology and Christian analytic philosophy into dialogue through an examination of the compatibility and complementarity of Karl Barth’s theology of revelation, and Alvin Plantinga’s epistemology of Christian belief. The first two chapters are aimed at elucidating the central features of Karl Barth’s theology of revelation and clarifying his attitude toward the place of philosophy in theology. We establish that, for Barth, human knowledge of God is objective, personal, cognitive knowing, enabled by the Spirit’s transforming gift of participation in revelation. We dispel the notion that Barth is hostile to philosophy per se and chart the boundaries he gives for its interface with theology.
In chapters 3 and 4, we focus on Alvin Plantinga’s Christian epistemology of warranted belief, and its relationship to Barth’s theology of revelation. A general alignment emerges in their shared inductive approach and agreed rejection of the necessity and sufficiency of human arguments for warranted Christian belief. Their contributions are complementary, with Barth providing what Plantinga lacks in theological depth, and Plantinga providing what Barth lacks in philosophical clarity and defense. Despite their general compatibility, two areas of significant potential incompatibility are flagged for closer analysis in the final two chapters.
In chapter 5, we consider their views on natural theology. We extend our thesis of complementarity with respect to negative apologetics, and argue for a harmonizing interpretation of their views with respect to a potential positive contribution from natural theology. The final chapter addresses the role of faith and the constitution of a genuine human knowledge of God. We conclude that Barth and Plantinga do not disagree about the personal and propositional character of revelation, but may disagree about the possibility of a generically theistic de re knowledge of God independent of the Spirit’s gift of faith
Il discorso filologico di C. Barth sulla Tebaide di Stazio
No full textEn introduction, on situera dans sa tradition exégétique le commentaire de Barth sur la Thébaïde de Stace (1664-65, posthume). On montrera ensuite comment le commentaire traite certaines questions philologiques (texte, sens littéral,style, etc.)
'Giving honour to the Spirit' : a critical analysis and evaluation of the doctrine of pneumatological union in the Trinitarian theology of Jonathan Edwards in dialogue with Karl Barth
No full textThe extent to which the 'honour' of the Spirit influenced the theology of
Jonathan Edwards is a hitherto underdeveloped theme. Against a backdrop of
Patristic thought and in dialogue with the theology of Karl Barth, evaluation is
made of pneumatological union in Edwards' Trinitarian theology as this centres
on the nature and inter-relatedness of the 'three unions' that characterize his
theology: the union of the three Persons of the Trinity, the union of the saints
with God, and the union of the divine and human natures of Christ.
Edwards' seeks to honour the Spirit as the mutual love of the Father for the Son
within his Augustinian, Lockean model of the immanent Trinity, and as 'Person'
in the economy. The challenges of doing so within the limits of this
psychological model of the Trinity are evaluated in dialogue with the
Cappadocian Fathers and Barth.
In a manner patterned after union in the Trinity, Edwards gave prominence to the
concept of the pneumatological union of the saints with God in Christ, in
fulfilment of the self-glorifying purpose of God in creation and redemption.
Edwards' experiential theology of conversion, and his elevation of subjective
sanctification by the Spirit over objective justification in Christ, for assurance, is
contrasted with Barth's greater emphases on the Christological union of God
with humanity and objective justification in Christ. Barth's more contemplative
approach is contrasted with the overly introspective spirituality of Edwards.
Edwards' view of the role of the Spirit in the hypostatic union of God with
humanity in Christ, which is reflective of the other unions, is also evaluated in
light of Patristic, Reformed-Puritan and Barthian thought on the nature of the
humanity Christ assumed, and the doctrine of the vicarious humanity of Christ. A
more emphatic incarnational emphasis may have saved Edwards' Spirit-
honouring spirituality from an anthropocentricity which is ironical given that the
glory of God is his ontic doxological concern
A Study of characterization and representation in James Joyce's a portrait of the artist as a young man and John barth's lost, in the funhouse
No full textDissetação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Comunicação e ExpressãoAnálise da caracterização e da representação do artista nos romances A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man de James Joyce e Lost in the Funhouse de John Barth. A análise destes romances quanto às diferenças existentes no modo de representação do artista, faz com que eles possam ser lidos, respectivamente, como representantes das narrativas modernista e pós-modernista
#01-#06 Tiling
No full text#01-#06 Tiling, is a flyer-series devoted to the development of an idea of process—and form of knowledge—adequate to theorise field knowledge: i.e., the aspects of knowledge that is linked to fieldwork, survey, documentation of process in documenting.
This kind of knowledge basis is not supported by proof, demonstration and argument, but on laying out puzzle-pieces (Bruno Latour). The series should be of interest to artistic research, environmental humanities, science technology studies, and to foundational research to develop anthroponomy as a research direction.
The series also should be of interest to professionals (and amateurs) interested in the relation between form, material and substance and the role these play in investigations that do not rely on function in the development of affordances in design.
If the approach appears to be rigorous it is because it seeks to establish a foundation of robustness in unwieldy discussions engaged by e.g. Anna Tsing, Bruno Latour, Donna Haraway and Rem Koolhaas.
The series should be of interest along readers and practitioners with an interest in approaches for to development, research and managing that are based on partnering with the environment and human entourage (immersively, positioned and situated).
OTHER SETS:
this flyer-set complements and concludes 4 other recent sets—
A) Clarifications #01-#06;
B) Categories #01-#06;
C) Verticality #01-#06,
D) Fredrik Barth #01-#06
Karl Barth's academic lectures on Ephesians (Göttingen, 1921-1922) : an original translation, annotation, and analysis
No full textThis thesis consists of an original translation, annotation, and analysis of Karl Barth’s Academic lectures on Ephesians, delivered in Göttingen, winter semester, 1921-1922. The translation is composed from a typescript of Barth’s handwritten manuscript, located in the Karl Barth Archives, Basel, and is annotated for scholarly research, including complete bibliographical information on Barth’s sources.
Barth’s exposition is a detailed exegesis of the Greek text of Eph. 1:1-23, comprising 13 lectures, with a summary of Ephesians 2-6 in the final chapter. Materially and formally, the exposition strongly resembles Romans II and Barth’s 1919 sermons on Ephesians, which the study examines. It also exhibits the theological objectivity of the Göttingen period, chiefly because of Barth’s explication of gnosis in Ephesians and his appropriation of Calvin’s theology of the knowledge of God.
Barth made a material discovery in his study of Ephesians that fundamentally shaped his subsequent theology. He observes in
Eph. 1:3-14 a train of thought which witnesses to God’s action to the creature in Christ and the creature’s subsequent movement to God. He concludes that we have come from God, who has chosen us in eternal election, and we are moving toward the glory of God, our divinely appointed goal. The exposition’s central theme is expressed in Barth’s claim that “the knowledge of God is the presupposition” and “the goal” of human existence.
The distinguishing mark of Barth’s theological exegesis is its concreteness, that is, his ability to speak about the text’s contemporary meaning without lapsing into theological abstraction. This concreteness is the consequence of his theological hermeneutic. He describes the interpretive event as a field of action, consisting of the biblical text, the activity of the interpreter, and the divine speech act
- …
