1,721,255 research outputs found

    Kyoto: doing our best is no longer enough

    No full text
    Barry W. Brook, Nick Rowley & Tim F. Flanner

    Use fast reactors to burn plutonium

    No full text
    Barry W. Brook, Tom Blees and William H. Hannu

    Minimum viable population size: not magic, but necessary

    No full text
    Barry W. Brook, Corey J.A. Bradshaw, Lochran W. Traill and Richard Frankha

    Quaternary Extinctions and Their Link to Climate Change

    No full text
    Also has ISBN 1597265705 ; 9781597265706Millennia before the modern biodiversity crisis-a worldwide event being driven by the multiple impacts of anthropogenic global change-a mass extinction of large-bodied fauna occurred. After a million years of severe climatic fluctuations, during which the earth waxed and waned between frigid ice ages and warm interglacials, with apparently few extinctions, hundreds of species of mammals, flightless birds, and reptiles suddenly went extinct over the course of the last 50,000 years (Barnosky, 2009). Due both to our intrinsic fascination with huge prehistoric beasts and to the possible insights these widespread species losses might lend to the modern extinction problem, the mystery of the "megafaunal" (large animal) extinctions have led to much theorizing, modeling, and digging (for their fossils or environmental proxies) over the last 150 years (Martin, 2005). The topic continues to invoke strong scientific interest (Koch and Barnosky, 2006; Grayson, 2007; Gillespie, 2008; Barnosky and Lindsey, 2010; Nogues-Bravo et al., 2010; Price et al., 2011).Barry W. Brook and Anthony D. Barnosk

    Minimum viable population size

    No full text
    Barry W. Brook, Corey J. A. Bradshaw and Mark McGinle

    50/500 rule and minimum viable populations: response to Jamieson and Allendorf

    No full text
    Richard Frankham, Barry W. Brook, Corey J.A. Bradshaw, Lochran W. Traill and Derek Spielma

    Causes and consequences of species extinctions

    No full text
    Navjot S. Sodhi, Barry W. Brook and Corey J. A. Bradshawhttp://press.princeton.edu/titles/8879.htm

    The ecological footprint remains a misleading metric of global sustainability

    Full text link
    In this Formal Comment, Blomqvist et al. note that the main points of their Perspective, “Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints,” are robust to Rees and Wackernagel's response, “The Shoe Fits, but the Footprint is Larger than Earth.”Linus Blomqvist, Barry W. Brook, Erle C. Ellis, Peter M. Kareiva, Ted Nordhaus, Michael Shellenberge
    corecore