1,721,712 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
[AFROTC member Barry Smith]
No full textPhotograph of North Texas State University AFROTC unit Professional Officer Course member Barry Smith in uniform
Recommended from our members
[AFROTC member Barry Smith]
No full textPhotograph of North Texas State University AFROTC unit Professional Officer Course member Barry Smith in uniform
Video Submission - Barry Smith
No full textBarry Smith, MUW Professor, shows his support for Banned Books Week by reading a selection from Bradbury\u27s Fahrenheit 451 and discussing what the book means to him
Mary Elizabeth Rose Duclos Barry Smith
No full textPhotograph of Mary Elizabeth Rose Duclos Barry Smith.
Mary Elizabeth Rose Duclos Barry Smith (1844-1925) was the daughter of Mary Stedman Owen and Jonathan Antoine Barry, a member of the firm of Barry & Bryant in Wilmington, NC. She married Harry Hungerford Smith, a civil war veteran. Mary is the granddaughter of James Porterfield Owen
Barry Smith an sich
Full text linkFestschrift in Honor of Barry Smith on the occasion of his 65th Birthday. Published as issue 4:4 of the journal Cosmos + Taxis: Studies in Emergent Order and Organization. Includes contributions by Wolfgang Grassl, Nicola Guarino, John T. Kearns, Rudolf Lüthe, Luc Schneider, Peter Simons, Wojciech Żełaniec, and Jan Woleński
Barry Smith and His Influence On (Not Only, But Mainly My) Philosophy
Full text linkAutobiographical survey of interactions between the author and Barry Smith, especially as concerns the background and influence of the Seminar for Austro-German Philosophy and work on the relevance of Adolf Reinach, Roman Ingarden and other Central-European thinkers to contemporary analytic philosophy
Assessing Ontologies: The Question of Human Origins and Its Ethical Significance 1
No full textIn their paper “Sixteen Days ” Barry Smith and Berit Brogaard try to answer the question: when does a human being begin to exist? In this paper we will address some methodological issues connected with this exercise in ontology. We shall begin by sketching the argument of “Sixteen Days”. We shall the
L’ontologie de la réalité sociale. Réponse à Barry Smith
No full textDans sa réponse à Barry Smith, John Searle relève trois erreurs dans l’interprétation de son travail par son collègue. La première concerne la formule « X compte pour Y », qui est son principal moyen d’analyse : cette formule est utile non pas parce qu’elle fait partie de la définition des objets sociaux, mais parce qu’elle permet de distinguer les fonctions liées à des traits intrinsèques des objets des fonctions liées à la reconnaissance collective d’un statut. La deuxième erreur consiste à croire qu’il faut analyser les faits sociaux et institutionnels en termes d’objets sociaux. La troisième est encore plus fondamentale : ne voyant pas qu’une analyse naturaliste des faits institutionnels est nécessaire, Smith pense que Searle tente de répondre aux questions que lui-même se pose au sujet de la nécessité.In his reply to Barry Smith, John Searle emphasizes three misconceptions on Smith’s part. The first is a biased conception of the basic tool of the analysis : the formula “X counts as Y” is useful not because it is a part of a definition of social objects, but because it gives a way of articulating the distinction between functions performed in virtue of intrinsic features of the objects and functions which are performed in virtue of collective recognition of a status. The second mistake consists in believing that social and institutional facts are to be analyzed in terms of social objects. The third mistake is a more fundamental one : failing to see the need for a naturalistic account of institutional facts, Smith thinks that Searle is trying to answer his various questions about necessity
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
