1,720,972 research outputs found

    Measurement of cabin pressure during a flight with a smartphone

    Get PDF
    An aircraft cabin is used as a laboratory for studying the atmospheric pressure during a flight. All the different steps of the flight: take-off, cruise altitude climbing and landing are monitored with the use of the pressure sensor of a smartphone. Specific details of the atmospheric pressure during take-off and landing are given. Calculations are done for the aircraft nose elevation angle during take-off, with the relation between the optimized cabin pressure for the passenger comfort and the aircraft altitude

    Tunable and transparent surface relief nanocavities for single nano-objects deposition

    No full text
    International audienc

    Tunable and transparent surface relief nanocavities for single nano-objects deposition

    No full text
    International audienc

    Metasurface for Third Order Nonlinear Effect: New Prospects for Photonics and Biology

    No full text
    International audienc

    Représentation de la fréquence en fonction du temps d'un signal à l'aide d'un smartphone et d'une flute à coulisse

    No full text
    International audienceReprésentation de la fréquence en fonction du temps d'un signal à l'aide d'un smartphone et d'une flute à couliss

    Metasurface for Third Order Nonlinear Effect: New Prospects for Photonics and Biology

    No full text
    International audienc

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore