1,720,990 research outputs found
BIOETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS ON MEDICAL RESEARCH USING HUMAN TISSUES: THE RESEARCHER'S VIEWPOINT
No full text
BIOETHICS CONSIDERATIONS FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH IN HUMAN ARCHIVE TISSUES: THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE RESEARCHER
No full textLetter to the editor, no abstract availabl
Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in the preoperative evaluation of smooth muscle tumors
No full textI.F. 0.93
In stage II/III lymph node positive breast cancer patients less than 55 years of age, keratin 8 expression in lymph node metastases but not in the primary tumor is an indicator of better survival
Full text linkAxillary lymph node status is one of the most important prognostic variables for breast cancer (BC). To investigate and understand the clinical, histopathological and biological factors that affect prognosis in node positive young breast cancer patients, we compared the phenotype of 100 primary tumours with their corresponding loco- regional lymph node (LN) metastases using conventional immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers currently in use for molecular classification of breast cancer. By comparing the expression of ER, PR, HER-2, Ki67, K8, K5/6 and vimentin, we found that expression of HER-2, Ki67, K8 and vimentin is frequently lost in lymph node metastases. Between the primary tumour and corresponding lymph node metastases expression of keratins K8 and K5/6 significantly changed. Expression of K8 in lymph node metastases, but not in primary tumours, segregates patients in two sub-groups with different outcome. Survival of patients with K8 positive LN metastases at 5 years in comparison with patients with K8 negative LN metastases was 75% vs 48%, at 10 years 62% vs 22% and at 20 years 53% vs 14%(p<0.001). K8 immunostaining of tissue from the lymph node metastasis allows defining a sub-group of lymph node positive BC patients with a highly unfavourable outcome, for whom therapeutic options might have to be reconsidered
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
- …
