1,721,059 research outputs found

    Combined modality staging of high risk rectal cancer

    No full text
    The personal experience with the radiologic staging of high risk rectal cancer undergoing preoperative treatment is reported. 61 patients shown to be affected by locally advanced (T3-T4, N+ with any T) rectal tumors on combined modality staging, underwent restaging 4-5 weeks after treatment. In all patients liver US, pelvic CT and colorectal enema were performed before and after treatment. In 22 patients with low rectal cancer transrectal sonography was performed. In 19 patients pelvic MRI was performed. The 61 patients were considered operable on second staging and thus referred to surgery. Subsequent control on histology has confirmed the diagnostic accuracy of the single procedures and of their combination. US was shown to be of high accuracy in the evaluation of T (90.8%) and of high predictive value for N. CT accuracy (84%) and MRI accuracy (78.9%) was lower because both tend to overstaging in the evaluation of T of rectal tumors undergoing preoperative treatment. Low CT accuracy (64%) and MRI accuracy (58%) was observed for N. There was optimum agreement between histology and imaging in the assessment of tumor shrinkage, well visualized by rectal enema which supported combined restaging with 88% accuracy for T

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Enhanced prenyltransferase activity and Rab protein content in the regenerating rat liver regeneration

    No full text
    Rabs are small GTP-binding proteins with a regulatory role in intracellular vesicular traffic. The modulation of their levels and activity in different physiological situations is poorly understood. During the first cell cycle of rat liver regeneration we observed a differential regulation of some Rabs, with a progressive increase of those involved in exocytosis and a progressive decrease of one involved in endocytosis. This could be related with the need of exposing growth factor receptors and prolonging the transduction of their signal in preparation for mitosis. Moreover, we observed an increased activity of protein prenyltransferases, the enzymes responsible for the prenylation of several proteins involved in crucial processes of proliferation, without a corresponding increase in the amount of prenyltransferase protein

    Color doppler us of intrahepatic vascular system

    No full text
    Aim of this article is an up-dating of the state of the art of color Doppler US in the assessment of intrahepatic vascularization. Recent reports are reviewed, based on already acquired certainties to better the knowledge of the physiology and pathophysiology of hepatic circulation to investigate new clinical applications of color Doppler US

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore