1,720,981 research outputs found
ASO Author Reflections: Local Excision Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer: A Compromise Between TME and Watch-and-Wait in Patients with Major Response
No full textThe management of surgical patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic
Full text linkBackground: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has raised several issues regarding the management of surgical patients. The aim of the current study was to clarify the management of oncologic and surgical patients during the pandemic. Methods: Relevant publications reporting on the epidemiology of the pandemic, the diagnosis of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, and the clinical management of cancer and surgical patients, as well as studies concerning health care workers’ safety, were included. The last date of research for this study was April 4, 2020. Results: We analyzed 28 papers. Real-time polymerase chain reaction was considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of COVID-19, and computed tomography scans were considered useful for cases of diagnostic uncertainty. Cancer patients and surgical patients were confirmed to be particularly at risk of infection and negative outcome. To guarantee adequate care to these patients, while minimizing the risk for infection, the early postponing of elective surgery, the creation of COVID-free facilities and the identification of COVID- dedicated operating theaters and teams have been proposed. The correct use of personal protective equipment was also strongly advocated, along with the institution of facilities for the psychologic support of health care workers. Conclusion: Clinicians should be aware of the importance of providing adequate care to patients with urgent and nondeferrable clinical issues, such as cancer. Every effort should be made to contain the virus spread in the hospital setting. Also, clinicians should value the importance of self-protection and mental health care
COVID-19 free pathways decrease postoperative complications in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery
Full text linkBackground: To reduce the exposition risk to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in surgical patients more prone to develop serious forms of Coronavirus disease 2019, a reorganization that pre-viewed the creation "COVID-19-free" hospitals or units was pursued. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of clear pathways to reduce the risk of SARS-Cov-2 transmission, on postoperative complications.Methods: Data of all consecutive patients undergoing surgical procedure for colorectal diseases, between November 2019 and July 2020 in two Italian referral centers, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: the ones underwent surgical procedures during the period before the pandemic from November 2019 to March 2020 (Group 1) (before-COVID), and those who underwent surgical procedure from April to July 2020 during the pandemic (Group 2) (during-COVID pandemic).Results: Overall, 264 patients were collected, 168 (63.4%) in Group 1 and 96 (36.4%) Group 2. Preoperative characteristics were similar between groups; during the pandemic there was a higher proportion of patients who underwent surgical procedures for malignancy compared with the period before the pandemic (92.7% vs 72%; p = 0.001). Patients in Group 2 had a lower rate of postoperative general complications (21.9% vs 34.5%; p = 0.03) and a lower rate of surgical complications (14.6% vs 25%; p = 0.05). No difference in term of medical complications, infections, and intraoperative complications were found. Minimally invasive approach (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.04-0.83; p = 0.01) and isolation of patients (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.83; p = 0.03) were indepen-dently associated with lower risk of postoperative complications.Conclusion: In this cohort study COVID-19-free pathways were significantly associated with low rate of post-operative morbidity in patients undergoing colorectal elective surgery
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Vascular Resections for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Vascular Resections for PDAC
Full text linkBackground and Aims: It has become clear that vein resection and reconstruction for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the standard of care as supported by multiple guidelines. However, resection of large peri-pancreatic arteries remains debatable. Materials and Methods: This review examines the current state of vascular resection with curative intent for PDAC in the last 5 years. Herein, we consider venous (superior mesenteric vein, portal vein), as well as arterial (superior mesenteric artery, celiac trunk, hepatic artery) resection or both with or without reconstruction. Results: Improvement of multidrug chemotherapy has revolutionized care for PDAC that should shift traditional surgical thinking from an anatomical classification of resectability to a prognostic and biological classification. Conclusion: The present review gives an overview on the results of pancreatectomy associated with vascular resection, with consideration of new perspectives offered by the availability of better systemic therapies
Robotic Resection of Giant Duodenal Hamartoma After 18Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Magnetic Resonance Imaging (18FDG PET-MRI)
No full textBrunner’s gland hamartoma is a rare duodenal lesion. Resection for benign neoplasms of the duodenum should be considered in case of malignant potential or in case of symptomatic lesions. An accurate preoperative staging is mandatory in order to allow minimally invasive surgical approach, and to avoid under- or overtreatment. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), Computed tomography (CT) scan, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and PET/CT are techniques widely used for gastrointestinal tumor staging. We report a case of a 41-year-old female presenting a giant lesion of the second portion of the duodenum. Pathological examination of multiple forceps biopsies was inconclusive for histological characterization of the lesion. After a clinical staging including Esophagusgastroduodenoscopy, EUS, and CT scan, a Hybrid 18FDG PET/MRI was performed to assess the malignant potential of the lesion and the relation between polyp base and Vater’s papilla. After multidisciplinary meeting, the patient underwent robotic transduodenal excision. The post-operative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on post-operative day 5. Final pathologic report consists in a histologically of Brunner’s Glands Hamartoma. This is the first report on the role of 18FDG PET/MRI in staging and planning treatment of bulky low malignant duodenal lesion. An accurate staging with 18FDG PET/MRI could be very useful in the planning the management of duodenal lesion with uncertain malignant potential in order to avoid under- and overtreatment
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
