163,570 research outputs found
El programa como bandera
No full textEl 20 de junio se conmemora el llamado Día de la Bandera. Como cada año, la burguesía argentina celebra un símbolo que expresa su soberanía y propiedad sobre los recursos materiales de la nación: tierras, ganado, grano, soja... Incluso como buena insignia patria, también sirve para sellar un vínculo con la clase obrera, reforzando la conciencia nacional de las masas y permitiendo consolidar un lazo de hegemonía y dominación de clase. Sin embargo, su naturaleza social y la de su “creador” siempre se nos aparecen escondidas. Y es que la bandera es la construcción simbólica de un proceso que fue gestado y desarrollado por vías no deseadas para estos tiempos que corren. En efecto, cuando se trata de hablar de Belgrano y del proceso que lo llevó al lugar que ocupa en el panteón nacional, su figura aparece edulcorada o mal comprendida. Vamos a intentar echar un poco de luz sobre estos problemas para definir cuál fue entonces su importancia.Fil: Flores, Juan Gabriel. Centro de Estudios e Investigación en Ciencias Sociales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales; Argentin
Asterocheres tarifensis Conradi & Bandera, 2011, n. sp.
No full textAsterocheres tarifensis, n. sp. (Figs. 1–4) Material examined. (a) holotype female (MNCN 20.04/ 8570) and one paratype female (MNCN 20.04/ 8571) associated with the scleractinian coral Astroides calycularis (Pallas) from Tarifa Island (southern Spain, 36 º 01N, 5 º 36 W) at 12 m depth collected in 1999; (b) 2 females and 2 males with the same sampling data as the holotype deposited in BEIM (COP – 513). Description. Adult female: Body (Fig. 1 A) cyclopiform, slender with an oval cephalothorax and a cylindrical urosome. Mean body length 558 µm (510–625 µm) and greatest width 266 µm (240–310 µm), based on 3 specimens. Ratio of length to width of prosome 1.36: 1. Ratio of length of prosome to that of urosome 2.18: 1. Prosome comprising cephalothorax, fully incorporating first pedigerous somite, and 3 free pedigerous somites. Somite bearing leg 4 with posterolateral angles rounded (Fig. 1 A). Urosome 4 -segmented, comprising leg 5 -bearing somite, genital double-somite and 2 free abdominal somites. Genital double-somite and following somites provided with large epicuticular scales arranged in overlapping pattern all around (Figs. 1 B, 4 A). Posteroventral margins of urosomites ornamented with hyaline frills with more or less serrated margins (Fig. 1 C). Genital double-somite (95 x 98 µm) slightly wider than long; paired genital apertures bipartite, comprising lateroventral copulatory pore and dorsolateral gonopore (oviduct opening); lateral margins with a spinule row (about 9–10 spinules) in distal third (posterior to genital apertures) (Figs. 1 B–C, 4 A). Genital area armed with two setae (Figs. 1 B, 4 B). Integumental pores and sensilla present on urosomites. Caudal rami (Fig. 1 B–C) about 25 x 20 µm (length measured along outer margin); covered by overlapping epicuticular scales; armed with 6 setae, seta I absent, setae II and VII slightly offset onto dorsal surface. Antennule (Fig. 1 D) 21 -segmented, about 230 µm long. Segmental homologies (expressed segment given first followed by ancestral segments in brackets) and setation pattern as follows: 1 (I)- 2, 2 (II)- 2, 3 (III)- 2, 4 (IV)- 2, 5 (V)- 2, 6 (VI)- 2, 7 (VII)- 2, 8 (VIII)- 2, 9 (IX-XII)- 7, 10 (XIII)- 1 +spine, 11 (XIV)- 2, 12 (XV)- 2, 13 (XVI)- 2, 14 (XVII)- 2, 15 (XIII)- 2, 16 (XIX)- 2, 17 (XX)- 2, 18 (XXI)- 2 +ae, 19 (XXII)- 2, 20 (XXIII-XXIV)- 4, 21 (XXV-XXVIII)- 7. All setae smooth. Antenna (Fig. 1 E) biramous, 170 µm long, including terminal claw. Coxa and basis unarmed; basis ornamented with fine spinule rows. Exopod 1 -segmented, with one small subterminal seta and one long terminal seta. Endopod 3 -segmented; proximal segment elongated; middle segment protruded distally on medial side but articulating with distal segment proximally on lateral side, bearing one distal seta; distal segment with distal claw (35 µm long), one subterminal and one terminal seta, all setae smooth. Siphon, about 120 µm long, reaching to insertion of maxillipeds. Mandible (Fig. 2 A) comprising stylet-like gnathobase and slender 2 -segmented palp. Stylet located in oral cone formed by anterior labrum and posterior labium, with 5 large teeth subapically. First segment of palp ornamented with distal spinules; second segment armed with 2 apical setae, the shorter smooth and the longer pinnate. Maxillule (Fig. 2 B) bilobed; praecoxal endite (inner lobe, 45 x 15 µm) larger than palp (outer lobe, 16 x 7 µm). Praecoxal endite armed with 4 barbed distal setae, ornamented with spinules on lateral margin and a row of long setules medially. Palp armed with 4 barbed, distal setae. Maxilla (Fig. 2 C) 2 -segmented; with unarmed coxa. Claw-like basis recurved in its end; armed with a few setules on the proximal inner lateral margin. Maxilliped (Fig. 2 D) 5 -segmented, comprising short syncoxa, long basis and distal subchela consisting of 3 free endopodal segments armed with distal claw-like element. Syncoxa with one short seta distally. Basis with a spinule on medial inner margin. First endopodal segment bearing two short medial setae and one distal seta; second endopodal segment with one medial seta and third endopodal segment bearing curved terminal claw (45 µm long) plus additional apical barbed seta. Swimming legs 1–4 (Figs. 3 A–D) biramous, with 3 -segmented rami. Intercoxal sclerite present in legs 1–4, ornamented with patches of spinules in legs 1 and 2. Spine and seta formula as follows: Coxae ornamented with spinule rows laterally in legs 3 and 4. Outer spines of exopodal segments in legs 1–4 bilaterally serrated. Lateral margins of exopodal segments in legs 1–3 with minute serrations; lateral margins of endopodal segments with rows of setules (Fig. 3 A–D). Second and third endopodal segments in legs 1–4 with a small beak-shaped spiniform process distally. Fifth leg (Fig. 1 B) with protopod incorporated into somite and one outer seta displaced to dorsal surface. Free segment slender (50 x 20 µm), armed with one subterminal and two terminal smooth setae and ornamented with few spinules. Sixth leg represented by paired opercular plates closing off gonopores on genital double somite; each armed with two smooth setae (Figs. 1 B; 4 B). Adult male: Unknown. Etymology. The specific name tarifensis refers to Tarifa Island where the species was collected. Remarks. With regards to the antennule, the species of the genus Asterocheres fall into two groups: females having a 18 to 20 -segmented antennule and females with a 21 -segmented antennule. The latter group contains a total of 20 species (Bandera & Conradi 2009) and can be subdivided into two subgroups: (1) species with a 1 -segmented mandibular palp and (2) species with a 2 -segmented mandibular palp. The new species described above belongs to the second subgroup. Together with Asterocheres tarifensis n.sp., 16 asterocherid species have a 21 -segmented antennule in females and a 2 -segmented mandibular palp: A. astroidicola Conradi et al., 2006; A. ellisi Hamond, 1968; A. flustrae Ivanenko & Smurov, 1997; A. hirsutus Bandera et al., 2005; A. jeanyeatmanae Yeatman, 1970; A. kervillei Canu, 1898; A. latus (Brady, 1872); A. lilljeborgi Boeck, 1859; A. lunatus Johnsson, 1998; A. reginae Boxshall & Huys, 1994; A. simulans (Scott T, 1898); A. suberitis Giesbrecht, 1899; A. tenerus (Hansen, 1923); A. tenuicornis Brady, 1910; A. uncinatus (Kritchagin, 1873) and A. urabensis Kim, 2004. However, A. intermedius (Hansen, 1923) also has to be included since there is no available information about its mandibular palp. Asterocheres tarifensis n.sp. can be separated from A. ellisi, A. jeanyeatmanae, A. lilljeborgi, A. lunatus; A. simulans, and A. reginae by its body shape. While these species have a dorsoventrally flattened prosome (Marcus & Por 1960; Hamond 1968; Yeatman 1970; Ivanenko & Ferrari 2003; Johnsson 1998; Ivanenko 1997; Boxshall & Huys 1994), A. tarifensis shows an oval cephalothorax and a cylindrical urosome (Fig. 1 A). Like the majority of Asterocheres species, the new species possesses three terminal setae in the free segment of the fifth leg (Fig. 1 B). However, A. uncinatus and A. latus differ from this species by the possession of only two terminal setae (for A. uncinatus, see Marcus & Por 1960) or two terminal seta and one hyaline setule (not a genuine seta) in the exopod of this leg (for A. latus, see Bandera & Conradi 2009 b). Asterocheres tarifensis n.sp. has a siphon which reaches up to the insertion of the maxillipeds, whereas A. astroidicola, A. hirsutus, A. intermedius and A. urabensis possess siphons which exceed this length (Kim 2004; Bandera et al. 2005; Conradi et al. 2006; Bandera & Conradi 2009 a). The new species is easily separated from A. tenuicornis, A. kervillei, A. suberitis and A. tenerus by the length of the caudal rami which is, almost 6 times longer than wide in A. tenuicornis, twice longer than wide in A. kervillei, slightly more than 1.5 times longer than wide in A. suberitis and only just longer than it is wide in A. tenerus, in comparison with that of A. tarifensis n. sp., in which the caudal rami is as long as it is wide (Bandera & Conradi 2009 a; b). Although A. flustrae also possesses caudal rami as long as its width, some characteristics such as the two setae of the antennary exopod (Fig. 1 E), the inner lobe of the maxillule with four setae (Fig. 2 B), the absence of an aesthetasc on the maxilla (Fig. 2 C), the 5 -segmented maxilliped (Fig. 2 D) and the two setae of the genital area separate A. tarifensis n.sp. from A. flustrae, since, A. flustrae has three setae on the antennary exopod; the inner lobe of the maxillule has five setae; the maxilla bears an aesthetasc on syncoxa; each genital area is armed with two elements, one seta and one spine and the maxilliped is 6 -segmented (according to the illustrations of Ivanenko & Smurov 1997). Host. Astroides calycularis is an azooxanthellate dendrophylliid colonial coral, typically inhabiting shallow waters down to a depth of about 30 m, and preferring shaded places and strong water movement (Zibrowius 1980; 1995). This coral, protected by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), is essentially endemic to the south-western Mediterranean, with a few outliers beyond the Strait of Gibraltar in the west and the Straits of Sicily in the east. The colonies of A. calycularis harbour an abundant associated fauna, including both mobile and sedentary species. At least two uncommon gastropods are now known to live and feed on this coral: Epitonium dendrophylliae Bouchet and Warén and the coralliophilid Babelomurex cariniferus (Sowerby) (Richter & Luque 2004). Various isopod species such as Carpias stebbingi (Monod); Cymodoce emarginata Leach; C. truncata Leach, Dynamene edwardsi (Lucas); Gnathia illepida (Wagner); G. inopinata Monod; G. venusta Monod, and G. v o r a x (Lucas) have also been recorded living on this coral (Castellanos et al. 2003). Recently two copepod species have been described living in association with A. calycularis: the cyclopoid Doridicola helmuti Conradi, et al., 2006; and the siphonostomatoid Asterocheres astroidicola Conradi et al., 2006. These species were found together with the siphonostomatoid Acontiophorus scutatus (Brady & Robertson, 1873) and an undetermined harpacticoid species (Conradi et al. 2006). Furthermore, the collection of some specimens of Asterocheres mucronipes in association with this coral serves to redescribe the species and accommodate it into a new genus, Stockmyzon Bandera and Huys, 2008 (Bandera & Huys 2008). Distribution. Known only from the type locality (southern Spain, 36 º 01N, 5 º 36 W).Published as part of Conradi, Mercedes & Bandera, Eugenia, 2011, Asterocherids (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida) associated with marine invertebrates in the Strait of Gibraltar, pp. 1-18 in Zootaxa 2925 on pages 2-8, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20341
Due o tre cose sui Bembo, cremonesi
No full textIntroduzione al catalogo della mostra in cui si rende conto dei problemi critici legati alla bottega di Bonifacio Bemb
Asterocheres sarsi Bandera & Conradi 2009
No full textAsterocheres sarsi Bandera & Conradi, 2009 (Figs 6–8) Ascomyzon latum Sars, 1915 Material examined. (a) holotype (preserved in ethanol, deposited in ZMO under registration number ZMO F 21600 a), and 10 females (preserved in ethanol, deposited in ZMO under registration number ZMO F 21600 b), collected from the bottom-residue of a large collecting-bottle containing a number of different invertebrate animals in RauØ by G. O. Sars. (b) 1 female (labelled as Ascomyzom latum and preserved in ethanol, deposited in ZMUC under registration number ZMUC-CRU- 4937), collected from Kapt. Ørssad (58 º 11 ’NB 4 ºØ, L. 658 ~). Description of adult female. Body (Fig. 6 A) cyclopiform, slender with cephalothorax oval and cylindrical urosome. Mean body length from anterior margin of rostrum to posterior margin of caudal rami 740 µm (710-780 µm); maximum width 450 µm (400-480 µm), based on 4 specimens. Prosome comprising cephalothorax (fully incorporating first pedigerous somite) and three free pedigerous somites. Somites bearing legs 2–3 broad; epimeral areas with posterolateral angles rounded (leg 2) or pointed (leg 3) (Fig. 6 A). Somite bearing leg 4 much smaller and narrower than preceding ones and largely concealed under somite bearing leg 3. Urosome 4 -segmented, comprising leg 5 -bearing somite, genital double-somite and two free abdominal somites. Urosome ornamented with large epicuticular spinules arranged in irregular pattern (Fig. 6 A, C) in all urosomites except for leg- 5 bearing somite which shows the spinules in overlapping rows pattern (Fig. 6 C). Genital double-somite (Fig. 6 C) slightly wider than long; paired genital apertures bipartite, each comprising lateroventral copulatory pore and dorsolateral gonopore (oviduct opening); lateral margins with setular tufts in distal third (posterior to genital apertures). Caudal rami (Fig. 6 C) about twice longer than wide (measured along outer margin); armed with seven setae; seta I present (Fig. 6 C), minute and displaced onto lateral surface, setae II–VII all arranged around posterior margin with setae II and VII slightly displaced onto dorsal surface. All of them plumose except for seta I which is naked (Fig. 6 A). Antennule (Fig. 6 B) 21 -segmented, about 395 µm long. Segmental fusion pattern as follows (Roman numerals indicating ancestral segments): 1 (I)- 2, 2 (II)- 2, 3 (III)- 2, 4 (IV)- 2, 5 (V)- 2, 6 (VI)- 2, 7 (VII)- 2, 8 (VIII)- 2, 9 (IX–XII)- 7, 10 (XIII)- 1 +spine, 11 (XIV)- 1 +spine, 12 (XV)- 2, 13 (XVI)- 2, 14 (XVII)- 2, 15 (XVIII)- 1, 16 (XIX)- 1, 17 (XX)- 2, 18 (XXI)- 2 +ae, 19 (XXII–XXIII)- 3, 20 (XXIV), 21 (XXV–XXVIII)- 6. Segment 10 (XIII) reduced, forming incomplete sclerite partly overlapped by distal expansion of compound segment 9 (IX–XII). Antenna biramous (Fig. 6 D), about 260 µm long. Coxa unarmed, with tufts of spinules. Basis unarmed, with fine spinule rows in lateral inner margin and longer spinule rows medially as shown in Figure 6 D. Exopod onesegmented, slender, about 2.5 times longer than wide; with two small lateral setae and one long terminal seta. Endopod three-segmented; proximal segment elongated, ornamented with lateral and medial rows of spinules as figured; middle segment produced distally on medial side but articulating with distal segment proximally on lateral side, bearing one naked subterminal seta; distal segment with two pinnate setae, one of them subterminal, and one terminal claw with rows of fine spinules; surface of distal segment with long setules. Siphon long and slender, about 230 µm long, reaching nearly to posterior margin of intercoxal sclerite of leg 1. Mandible (Fig. 7 B) comprising stylet-like gnathobase and slender two-segmented palp. Proximal segment of palp longest, ornamented with rows of spinules on lateral and distal margins; distal segment shortest, with two plumose, unequal apical setae. Stylet located in oral cone, formed by anterior labrum and posterior labium. Stylet with denticulate margin subapically (Fig. 7 B). Maxillule (Fig. 7 A) bilobed; praecoxal gnathobase (inner lobe) distinctly larger than palp (outer lobe). Praecoxal endite conical, ornamented with setules proximally and spinules distally on the lateral margin and a row of long setules medially; armed with one short and naked and four long but unequal plumose setae, the three longer with minute spines distally. Palp reduced, about three times shorter than praecoxal endite, with one short naked seta and three longer pinnate setae. Maxilla (Fig. 7 D) two-segmented but with partial transverse surface suture on syncoxa (proximal segment) possibly marking plane of praecoxa-coxa fusion; praecoxal portion bearing flaccid aesthetasc-like element medially, representing tubular extension of external opening of maxillary gland; coxal portion unarmed but ornamented with a row of spinules medially as figured. Basis claw-like, more or less straight but recurved towards the apex; armed with one seta at middle length. Maxilliped (Fig. 7 C) five-segmented, comprising short syncoxa, long basis and three-segmented endopod. Syncoxa with one seta and a row of spinules distally. Basis with rows of spinules on distal outer and inner margin and one seta at middle length. First endopodal segment ornamented with spinules on lateral margin and armed with two medial setae and one short distal seta; second endopodal segment bearing one long barbed seta; third endopodal segment bearing recurved terminal claw plus additional apical pinnate seta. Distal margin of claw provided with a row of minute spinules. Swimming legs 1–4 (Figs. 8 A-D) biramous, with three-segmented rami. Intercoxal sclerite present in legs 1–4, ornamented with patches of spinules in legs 1–3. Spine and seta formula as Table 3. Coxae ornamented with spinule rows around outer margin; inner coxal seta absent in leg 1 (ornamented with a crown of spinules as figured), long and plumose in legs 2-3 and short and bare in leg 4. Bases of legs 1-3 with spinules around inner margin; outer seta long and naked in leg 1, long and plumose in legs 2-3 and short and smooth in leg 4. Outer spines of exopodal segments in legs 1-4 bilaterally serrate. Lateral margins of exopodal segments with minute serrations or spinular rows; those of endopodal segments with rows of setules. Fifth leg (Fig. 6 C) with protopod incorporated into somite; outer basal seta displaced to laterodorsal surface. Free segment (exopod) elongate-oval, with one short naked seta subterminal and two long plumose setae distally; outer and inner margins with spinules. Sixth leg (Fig. 6 C) represented by paired opercular plates closing off gonopores on genital double-somite; armed each with one plumose seta and one spiniform element. Distribution. Norway (Sars 1915). Remarks. This species was poorly described by G. O. Sars (1915) as Ascomyzon latum. However, as Bandera and Conradi (2009 b) pointed out, the specimens that Sars stated to be identical to Cyclopicera lata (Brady) and described as Ascomyzon latum were actually different from A. echinicola (= A. violaceus) and Cyclopicera lata. These authors redescribed C. lata as Asterocheres latus and named the species described by Sars as Ascomyzon latum as Asterocheres sarsi but they did not redescribed this species. Asterocheres sarsi is characterized by the possession of 21 segments in the female antennule, 2 -segmented mandibular palp, oral cone reaching to the posterior margin of intercoxal plate of leg 1, inner seta on coxa of leg 1 absent and body cyclopiform, with cephalotorax oval and cyclindrical urosome and epimeral areas of somite bearing leg 3 with posterolateral angles pointed. These features are only shared by another species, A. eugenioi, described above; however, the length of the caudal rami differs in both species. While A. sarsi presents caudal rami that are twice longer than wide, A. eugenioi has a shorter caudal rami, about 1.5 times longer than wide. In A. sarsi, caudal seta I is present but it is absent A. eugenioi. Asterocheres sarsi shows the antenna, including the claw, much more ornamented with spinules and setules than A. eugenioi; and the urosomal somites with large epicuticular spinules arranged in irregular pattern in all urosomites except for leg- 5 bearing somite which shows the spinules in overlapping rows pattern. This kind of ornamentation has not been observed in the urosome of A. eugenioi. As for the fifth leg, in A. eugenioi the seta of the protopodal segment and those of the free segment are naked. However, in A. sarsi the seta of the protopodal segment is plumose, the two longer setae belonging to the free segment are barbed and the shorter one is naked. The stylet of the mandible also serves to separate these species. A. sarsi has a stylet with the tip sharply pointed; in contrast, A. eugenioi possesses a stylet with the margin multi-denticulated subapically.Published as part of Bandera, Eugenia & Conradi, Mercedes, 2014, A new species of Asterocheres (Copepoda, Siphonostomatoida) with a redescription of A. complexus Stock, 1960 and A. sarsi Bandera & Conradi, 2009, pp. 542-558 in Zootaxa 3827 (4) on pages 552-556, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3827.4.6, http://zenodo.org/record/22902
JURA DE BANDERA [Material gráfico]
No full textRETRATO DEL ARTESANO J. MANUEL DÍAZ DÍAZ, EL DÍA DE SU JURA DE BANDERA, EN HOYA FRÍA, TENERIFE.SE TRATA DE UN ACTO SOLEMNE Y PÚBLICO, PRESIDIDO POR UNA AUTORIDAD DE LA DEFENSA, POR EL QUE LOS MILITARES EXPRESAN SU VOCACIÓN DE SERVICIO A ESPAÑA, REALIZANDO UN JURAMENTO O PROMESA ANTE LA BANDERA COMO TESTIGO. LOS MILITARES PROFESIONALES EFECTUARÁN EL JURAMENTO O PROMESA ANTE LA BANDERA DE ESPAÑA, COMO REQUISITO PREVIO A LA ADQUISICIÓN DE SU CONDICIÓN.Copia digital. Madrid : Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. Subdirección General de Coordinación Bibliotecaria, 201
Variations on the Author
No full text“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Invecchiamento della popolazione: implicazioni di ordine odontoiatrico ed approccio al paziente anziano
No full textWarning
No full textLa imagen contiene una noticia acerca de Aviso, destacando la preocupación de algunos empleados del sector ejecutivo de suscribirse al periódico Bandera Nacional por temor a represalias o remociones arbitrarias de sus puestos. El aviso critica la falta de libertad y señala que, debido a esta situación, los editores han decidido no publicar los nombres de sus suscriptores para protegerlos de posibles consecuencias negativas. Noticia publicada en La Bandera Nacional. Octubre 22 de 1837.The image contains a news story about Aviso, highlighting the concern of some employees in the executive sector about subscribing to the Bandera Nacional newspaper for fear of retaliation or arbitrary removal from their positions. The notice criticizes the lack of freedom and points out that, due to this situation, publishers have decided not to publish the names of their subscribers to protect them from possible negative consequences. News published in La Bandera Nacional. October 22, 1837
La bandera mexicana: Breve historia de su formación y simbolismo
No full textLos países suelen tener una bandera que representa la unidad, la independencia o los valores nacionales más estimados. Cada bandera expresa esos valores con un simbolismo propio, inconfundible, y les confiere con un simbolismo propio, inconfundible, y les confiere la representación de la identidad nacional. Lo distintivo de la bandera mexicana es que en su hechura participaron tres tradiciones diferentes: la indígena, la herencia religiosa hispánica y colonial y la tradición liberal que propuso fundar estados autónomos y soberanos.Los países suelen tener una bandera que representa la unidad, la independencia o los valores nacionales más estimados. Cada bandera expresa esos valores con un simbolismo propio, inconfundible, y les confiere con un simbolismo propio, inconfundible, y les confiere la representación de la identidad nacional. Lo distintivo de la bandera mexicana es que en su hechura participaron tres tradiciones diferentes: la indígena, la herencia religiosa hispánica y colonial y la tradición liberal que propuso fundar estados autónomos y soberanos
[Octavio Medellin, Working in His Studio, Bandera, Texas]
No full textOctavio Medellin working in his studio in Bandera, Texas. Visible is his copper metalwork sculpture titled ''Peacock''.Verso: [handwritten] Working in My Studio, Bandera, TX. 1990, O. Medellin
- …
