1,721,509 research outputs found
Baker, Philip, 5/1881
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/427845Surname: Baker. Given Name(s) or Initials: Philip. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 5/1881. Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: K290. Division Enquiry: WA. Rank: PTE. Unit: [No Unit]326602
Item: [2016.0049.60107] "Baker, Philip, 5/1881
Disseminating Cochrane evidence to the public health workforce via author-led webinars
No full text<b>Title</b>\ud
\ud
- Disseminating Cochrane evidence to the public health workforce via author-led webinars\ud
\ud
<b>Background</b> \ud
\ud
- <u><a href="http://www.healthevidence.org/">Health Evidence™</a></u> is a free searchable repository, of 4,500+ quality-appraised public health relevant reviews, including nearly 700 Cochrane reviews. Author-led webinars is one knowledge translation strategy to disseminate the findings of Cochrane reviews.\ud
\ud
<b>Objectives</b>\ud
\ud
- (i) Disseminate the findings of Cochrane reviews via webinars\ud
\ud
- (ii) Evaluate the impact of Cochrane author-led webinars \ud
\ud
<b>Methods</b>\ud
\ud
- Webinars are 60-90 minutes in length and include: an overview of the principles of evidence-informed decision making (15mins), a presentation of the findings by the review author (30mins), and a Q&A period (30mins). Webconferencing software monitors participant registration, attendance, engagement, poll responses, and questions. Standard polling questions are asked throughout each session to assess familiarity with and use of systematic reviews, as well as familiarity and agreement with session-specific review findings.\ud
\ud
<b>Results</b>\ud
\ud
- Since January 2015 Health Evidence™ has hosted six Cochrane author-led webinars. Webinar participants include: nurses, health promoters, physicians, dietitians, and knowledge brokers. On average, participants in each session were attentive and engaged 68.8% of the time. Google Analytics reflect an average 572% increase in users accessing the Cochrane review featured in each webinar on the day of the session compared to average daily access the month prior. On average, each session attracted 177 registrants, of which approximately half joined on the session date. Poll response data reveal 59.6% attendees use systematic reviews to inform their practice. Data collected pre/post on participant’s knowledge of the effectiveness of an intervention, suggest that webinars are an effective way to influence participant’s knowledge about intervention effectiveness (participant knowledge improved 10-31.8%, measured via pre/post poll questions). During the Q&A period, attendees submitted 5-12 questions per session.\ud
Conclusion: Webinars are an interactive and effective mechanism for promoting public health relevant Cochrane evidence to decision makers. Data from webinars highlight a high level of interest and engagement with Cochrane author-led sessions
Nécessité de la recherche scientifique pour l'aide due au Tiers Monde
No full textNoel-Baker Philip. Nécessité de la recherche scientifique pour l'aide due au Tiers Monde. In: Tiers-Monde, tome 20, n°78, 1979. Découverte et innovation scientifiques au service du tiers monde. Colloque Henri Laugier. pp. 311-316
Podcast: Interventions for preventing abuse in the elderly
No full textThe typical Cochrane Review provides answers about the treatment of a disease but, occasionally, one comes along that tackles other major challenges facing society. One such new review in August 2016 looks at the evidence on various ways to prevent abuse in the elderly. Here’s one of the research team, Philip Baker from Queensland University of Technology in Australia to tell us what they found
Community wide interventions for increasing physical activity (protocol)
No full textThis is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows:\ud
\ud
Primary research objective\ud
To determine the effects of community wide, multi-strategic interventions upon community levels of physical activity.\ud
\ud
Secondary research objectives\ud
1. To explore whether any effects of the intervention are different within and between populations, and whether these differences form an equity gradient.\ud
2. To describe other health (e.g. cardiovascular disease morbidity) and behavioural effects (e.g. diet) where appropriate outcomes are available.\ud
3. To explore the influence of context in the design, delivery, and outcomes of the interventions.\ud
4. To explore the relationship between the number of components, duration, and effects of the interventions.\ud
5. To highlight implications for further research and research methods to improve knowledge of the interventions in relation to the primary research objective
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
