1,720,973 research outputs found
Figs. 3–4 in A New Subgenus of Megachile from Borneo with Arolia (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)
No full textFigs. 3–4. Photomicrographs of Megachile (Matangapis) alticola Cameron. 3. Female, facial view.Published as part of BAKER, DONALD B. & ENGEL, MICHAEL S., 2006, A New Subgenus of Megachile from Borneo with Arolia (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae), pp. 1-12 in American Museum Novitates 3505 (1) on page 5, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2006)505[0001:ANSOMF]2.0.CO;2, http://zenodo.org/record/538357
Figs. 1–3 in A New Species of Tetralonia (Thygatina) from India, with Notes on the Oriental Fauna (Hymenoptera: Apidae)
No full textFigs. 1–3. Photomicrographs of male holotype of Tetralonia (Thygatina) macroceps, new species.Published as part of ENGEL, MICHAEL S & BAKER, DONALD B, 2006, A New Species of Tetralonia (Thygatina) from India, with Notes on the Oriental Fauna (Hymenoptera: Apidae), pp. 1-12 in American Museum Novitates 3527 (1) on page 3, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2006)3527[1:ANSOTT]2.0.CO;2, http://zenodo.org/record/538458
Figs. 1–2 in A New Subgenus of Megachile from Borneo with Arolia (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)
No full textFigs. 1–2. Photomicrographs of Megachile (Matangapis) alticola Cameron. 1. Female, lateral habitus. 2. Male, lateral habitus.Published as part of BAKER, DONALD B. & ENGEL, MICHAEL S., 2006, A New Subgenus of Megachile from Borneo with Arolia (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae), pp. 1-12 in American Museum Novitates 3505 (1) on page 4, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2006)505[0001:ANSOMF]2.0.CO;2, http://zenodo.org/record/538357
Figs. 6–13 in A New Subgenus of Megachile from Borneo with Arolia (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)
No full textFigs. 6–13. Megachile (Matangapis) alticola Cameron; 6, female; 7–13, male. 6. Female mandible. 7. Male mandible. 8. Fourth metasomal sternum. 9. Fifth metasomal sternum. 10. Sixth metasomal sternum. 11. Eighth metasomal sternum (setae omitted). 12. Genital capsule, lateral aspect. 13. Genital capsule; left half is dorsal aspect, right half is ventral aspect.Published as part of BAKER, DONALD B. & ENGEL, MICHAEL S., 2006, A New Subgenus of Megachile from Borneo with Arolia (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae), pp. 1-12 in American Museum Novitates 3505 (1) on page 7, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2006)505[0001:ANSOMF]2.0.CO;2, http://zenodo.org/record/538357
A new subgenus of Megachile from Borneo with arolia (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae)
No full textFig. 5. Scanning electron micrograph of the metapretarsus and metadistitarsal apex of Megachile (Matangapis) alticola Cameron depicting large arolium. Arolia are present on all legs of both sexes; the claws of the female (seen here) are simple, whereas those of males are bifid. The small, spheroid objects on the claws are grains of pollen.Published as part of BAKER, DONALD B. & ENGEL, MICHAEL S., 2006, A New Subgenus of Megachile from Borneo with Arolia (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae), pp. 1-12 in American Museum Novitates 3505 (1) on page 5, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2006)505[0001:ANSOMF]2.0.CO;2, http://zenodo.org/record/538357
Figs. 5–11 in A New Species of Tetralonia (Thygatina) from India, with Notes on the Oriental Fauna (Hymenoptera: Apidae)
No full textFigs. 5–11. Holotype male of Tetralonia (Thygatina) macroceps, new species. 5. Facial view; 6. base of antenna showing scape, pedicel, and first three flagellomeres; 7. metapretarsus; 8. seventh metasomal tergum (left half is dorsal, right half is ventral); 9. seventh metasomal sternum; 10. eighth metasomal sternum; 11. genitalic capsule. Scale bars 5 1 mm (bar between mandibles for fig. 5; bar beneath distitarsus for figs. 6– 8; bar at bottom of right column for figs. 9–11).Published as part of ENGEL, MICHAEL S & BAKER, DONALD B, 2006, A New Species of Tetralonia (Thygatina) from India, with Notes on the Oriental Fauna (Hymenoptera: Apidae), pp. 1-12 in American Museum Novitates 3527 (1) on page 5, DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2006)3527[1:ANSOTT]2.0.CO;2, http://zenodo.org/record/538458
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
