1,721,018 research outputs found
Colonic sulfide in pathogenesis and treatment of ulcerative colitis
No full textA role for colonic sulfide in the pathogenesis and treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) has emerged based on biochemical, microbiological, nutritional, toxicological, epidemiological, and therapeutic evidence. Metabolism of isolated colonic epithelial cells has indicated that the bacterial short-chain fatty acid n-butyrate maintains the epithelial barrier and that sulfides can inhibit oxidation of n-butyrate analogous to that observed in active UC. Sulfur for fermentation in the colon is essential for n-butyrate formation and sulfidogenesis aids disposal of colonic hydrogen produced by bacteria. The numbers of sulfate-reducing bacteria and sulfidogenesis is greater in UC than control cases. Sulfide is mainly detoxified by methylation in colonic epithelial cells and circulating red blood cells. The enzyme activity of sulfide methylation is higher in red blood cells of UC patients than control cases. Patients with UC ingest more protein and thereby sulfur amino acids than control subjects. Removing foods rich in sulfur amino acids (milk, eggs, cheese) has proven therapeutic benefits in UC. 5-Amino salicylic acid reduces fermentative production of hydrogen sulfide by colonic bacteria, and aminoglycosides, which inhibit sulfate-reducing bacteria, are of therapeutic benefit in active UC. Methyl-donating agents are a category of drugs of potential therapeutic use in UC. A correlation between sulfide production and mucosal immune responses in UC needs to be undertaken. Control of sulfidogenesis and sulfide detoxification may be important in the disease process of UC, although whether their roles is in an initiating or promoting capacity has yet to be determined.Roediger, W.E.W. ; Moore, J. ; Babidge, W
Colonic luminal hydrogen sulfide is not elevated in ulcerative colitis
No full textIt has been proposed that the reduction in n-butyrate oxidation by colonic epithelial cells observed in ulcerative colitis may be related to exposure to reduced forms of sulfur derived from dissimilatory sulfate reduction by luminal microflora. This study aims to compare stool sulfide concentrations in control and colitic subjects. Control subjects had significant colorectal disease excluded by virtue of their selection. Patients with ulcerative colitis were stratified by disease extent and activity, and by salicylate drug use. Stool sulfide was measured using a direct spectrophotometric method on NaOH (free sulfide) and zinc acetate (total sulfide) stool slurries. Fifteen control and 19 colitic subjects were studied. There was no significant difference in stool sulfide between control and colitic patients (free sulfide, control = 0.52 (0.17), colitic = 0.45 (0.10), t = 0.36, P = 0.71, total sulfide, control = 1.33 (0.21), colitic = 0.96 (0.15), t = 1.44, P = 0.16). Disease extent or activity did not significantly influence stool sulfide. These results do not support a primary etiologic role for luminal sulfide in ulcerative colitis.Moore, J. ; Babidge, W. ; Millard, S. ; Roediger, W
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
PP09 Fecal immunochemical tests for patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and multiple-threshold meta-analysis
Full text linkVariations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
