1,720,989 research outputs found
Carcinoma of the papilla of Vater: prognostic and therapeutics considerations
No full textCarcinoma of the papilla of Vater: prognostic and therapeutics consideration
Central pancreatectomy: the Dagradi Serio Iacono operation. Evolution of a surgical technique from the pioneers to the robotic approach.
No full textCentral pancreatectomy (CP) is a parenchyma-sparing surgical procedure. The aims are to clarify the history and the development of CP and to give credits to those from whom it came. Ehrhardt, in 1908, described segmental neck resection (SNR) followed, in 1910, by Finney without reconstructive part. In 1950 Honjyo described two cases of SNR combined with gastrectomy for gastric cancer infiltrating the neck of the pancreas. Guillemin and Bessot (1957) and Letton and Wilson (1959) dealt only with the reconstructive aspect of CP. Dagradi and Serio, in 1982, performed the first CP including the resective and reconstructive aspects. Subsequently Iacono has validated it with functional endocrine and exocrine tests and popularized it worldwide. In 2003, Baca and Bokan performed laparoscopic CP and, In 2004, Giulianotti et al performed a robotic assisted CP. CP is performed worldwide either by open surgery or by using minimally-invasive or robotic approaches. This confirms that the operation does not belong to whom introduced it but to everyone who carries out it; however credit must be given to those from whom it came
Results of pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: extended versus standard procedure
No full textIn Western experience, the long-term survival benefit after extended pancreaticoduodenectomy (EPD) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is still controversial. The aim of this work was to evaluate weather EPD for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma prolongs long-term survival compared to standard pancreaticoduodenectomy (SPD). From November 1992 to September 1996, we performed pancreatic resections in 30 patients affected by stage I-III pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: 13 patients underwent SPD and 17 patients underwent EPD, consecutively. The two groups of patients were similar for all the demographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics, and all the intraoperative factors considered except the number of resected lymph nodes (mean number per case = 34.2 +/- 15.5 in the EPD group versus 12.8 +/- 3.6 in the SPD group, p <0.001) and the operative time (median time per case = 375 minutes in the EPD group versus 270 minutes in the SPD group, p = 0.009). Patients in the two groups experienced a similar postoperative course. The estimated survival probability at 1 and 3 years after operation was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49 to 0.90) and 0.24 (95% CI: 0.07 to 0.45) in the EPD group; 0.31 (95% CI: 0.09 to 0.55) and 0.08 (95% CI: 0.00 to 0.29) in the SPD group (p = 0.014). According to a Cox model, the treatment was associated with R0 patients' long-term survival (SPD versus EPD: hazard ratio (HR) = 4.82, 95% CI: 1.66 to 14.00, p = 0.004). Grading of tumor differentiation was confirmed to be a relevant prognostic factor (poor versus moderate: HR = 4.33, 95% CI: 1.49 to 12.61, p = 0.007), whereas type of resection had no significant effect (pylorus-preserving versus hemigastrectomy: HR = 1.49, 95% CI: 0.56 to 3.95, p = 0.42). The proportion of R0 patients with local recurrence was lower in the EPD group (20.0% versus 70.0%, p = 0.034)
How is possible a certain preoperative diagnosis of main benign liver tumors?
No full textHow is possible a certain preoperative diagnosis of main benign liver tumor
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
