1,720,974 research outputs found
Prostaglandin production by human polymorphnuclear leucocytes during phagocytosis in vitro
No full text
Multi-objective stochastic scheduling of inpatient and outpatient surgeries
No full textWith the advancement of surgery and anesthesiology in recent years, surgical clinical pathways have changed significantly, with an increase in outpatient surgeries. However, the surgical scheduling problem is particularly challenging when inpatients and outpatients share the same operating room blocks, due to their different characteristics in terms of variability and preferences. In this paper, we present a two-phase stochastic optimization approach that takes into account such characteristics, considering multiple objectives and dealing with uncertainty in surgery duration, arrival of emergency patients, and no-shows. Chance Constrained Integer Programming and Stochastic Mixed Integer Programming are used to deal with the advance scheduling and the allocation scheduling, respectively. Since Monte Carlo sampling is inefficient for solving the allocation scheduling problem for large size instances, a genetic algorithm is proposed for sequencing and timing procedures. Finally, a quantitative analysis is performed to analyze the trade-off between schedule robustness and average performance under the selection of different patient mixes, providing general insights for operating room scheduling when dealing with inpatients, outpatient, and emergencies
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
