1,721,063 research outputs found
Pre-torsors and Galois comodules over mixed distributive laws
We study comodule functors for comonads arising from mixed distributive laws. Their Galois property is reformulated in terms of a (so-called) regular arrow in Street's bicategory of comonads. Between categories possessing equalizers, we introduce the notion of a regular adjunction. An equivalence is proven between the category of pre-torsors over two regular adjunctions (N A, RA) and (NB, RB) on one hand, and the category of regular comonad arrows (RA, ξ) from some equalizer preserving comonad C to NBRB on the other. This generalizes a known relationship between pre-torsors over equal commutative rings and Galois objects of coalgebras. Developing a bi-Galois theory of comonads, we show that a pre-torsor over regular adjunctions determines also a second (equalizer preserving) comonad D and a coregular comonad arrow from D to NARA, such that the comodule categories of C and D are equivalent. © 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
A Schneider type Theorem for Hopf Algebroids
Comodule algebras of a Hopf algebroid H with a bijective antipode, i.e. algebra extensions B ⊆ A by H, are studied. Assuming that a lifted canonical map is a split epimorphism of modules of the (noncommutative) base algebra of H, relative injectivity of the H-comodule algebra A is related to the Galois
property of the extension B ⊆ A and also to the equivalence of the category of relative Hopf modules to the category of B-modules. This extends a classical theorem by H.-J. Schneider on Galois extensions by a Hopf algebra. Our main tool is an observation that relative injectivity of a comodule algebra is equivalent to relative separability of a forgetful functor, a notion introduced and analysed hereby
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Comparison between GPR measurements and ultrasonic tomography with different inversion algorithms: an application to the base of an ancient Egyptian sculpture
By late 2008 one of the most important pieces of the ‘Museo delle Antichit`a Egizie’ of Turin,
the sculpture of the Pharaoh with god Amun, was planned to be one of the masterpieces of a
travelling exhibition in Japan. The ‘Fondazione Museo delle Antichit`a Egizie di Torino’, who
manages the museum, was concerned with the integrity of the base of the statue which actually
presents visible signs of restoration dating back to the early 19th century. It was required to
estimate the persistence of the visible fractures, to search for unknown ones and to provide
information about the overall mechanical strength of the base. To tackle the first question a
GPR reflection survey along three sides of the base was performed and the results were
assembled in a 3D rendering. As far as the second question is concerned, two parallel,
horizontal ultrasonic 2D tomograms across the base were made. We acquired, for each
section, 723 ultrasonic signals corresponding to different transmitter and receiver positions.
The tomographic data were inverted using four different software packages based upon
different algorithms. The obtained velocity images were then compared each other, with the
GPR results and with the visible fractures in the base. A critical analysis of the comparisons is
finally presented
Automatic pickers performances in the case of the Emilia sequence of May-June 2012
The automatic processing of seismic data, whether for real-time seismic warning system or to reprocessing large amount of seismic recordings, is increasingly being demanded by seismologists especially in case of emergency as for the Emilia sequence in may-june 2012. In this study is presented a comparison between the AutoPicker (DipTeRiS, University of Genova) a new method used for automatic accurate onset phase picking for both P and S wave arrival based on the Akaike's information criterion (AIC), a solid and tested picker as the STA/LTA in Antelope software and the manual pickings. In order to construct the database used for the relocation of Emilia sequence, the RAN strong motion database has been merged with the available velocity and acceleration data extracted from the EIDA database (European Integrated Data Archive) and velocity data recorded by the Southeastern Alps Integrated Network (DMG, OGS, ARSO and ZAMG). The fault system of the Emilia earthquake area is complex and it is not easy to assess which fault has moved. A precise localization of the sequence is essential. The manual pickings, the equivalent locations and the choice of the most appropriate velocity model (“Iside”) used in this study are the results of a work done in collaboration with Università di Chieti and DPC, not described here. The main problem of the AutoPicker and Antelope software is to discriminate events that occur very close to each other in time. The best way to solve that issue is choosing the best setup of both techniques to minimize the problem. Then we are implementing the AutoPicker technique on the Antelope system routinely used by DMG for the real-time data analysis. In addition we use automatic locations and manual locations to produce a travel time tomography of the field near the generating fault of Emilia sequence 2012 and compare the different results in order to study how much the location's errors influence the tomography's results
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
