1,720,973 research outputs found
Clodronate: New directions of use
No full textClodronate is the father of bisphosphonates. For over three decades it has been subject of study in biological and clinical areas, proving to be an extremely interesting molecule from different points of view. It has been the first drug for osteoporosis that can be administered pulsatorily (once every 15 days or once a week). This, along with good tolerability, has been the first cause of its success, when there were no solid data in literature about its antifracture efficacy. There are three published studies that prove its antifracture effect: two by McCloskey published in 2004 and 2007 on BMR, and our study about fracture prevention in corticosteroids OP. In these studies a dose of 800 mg/day orally administered or 100 mg/week I.M. was used, and they are basically the same if you consider that clodronate absorption, orally administered, is on average 1.9%. However, a series of works where higher doses were used (1600 mg orally administered) with greater effectiveness on bone mass, especially in higher risk populations, lead us to consider the use of 200 mg i.m. formulation. First of all, we proved densitometric equivalence of 200 mg i.m./14 days and 100 mg i.m./week in a first study; then, in a second study, we proved a greater densitometric efficacy of 200 mg/week compared to 100 mg/week, clearer at femoral level, where the drug had not proven to prevent femoral fracture because of inadequate bone mass increase at that level. Moreover, as for ibandronate case, monthly dose was doubled compared to pivotal trial, in order to maximize the effects on femoral bone mass and therefore prevent femoral fractures. Consequently, on the basis of the risk envelope, whether it is identified according to BMD and the presence of one risk factor at least or more correctly identified through risk chart (FRAX or DeFRA), you can put forward a differential use of 100 mg i.m. and 200 mg i.m., weekly, "off-label" or every 14 days, adjusting doses in relation to fracture risk and painful symptoms gravity, as well as improving its ease of use and therefore assist compliance. Common experience and clinical and biological works have proved that clodronate has an analgesic effect that can be increased by doubling the doses. The analgesic effect is present not only with patients with fractures, but also with patients suffering from osteoarthritis or arthritis. Therefore, the drug would fit well in the therapeutic program of rheumatic patient, also because of its symptomatic effects. Clodronate at small doses (2 mg) could also have protective effects on cartilage (introduction of intra-articular formulation is expected) and at 10-100 fold higher doses it has certainly anti-inflammatory effects and more specifically antimacrophage and anticytokine effects (IL-1, IL-6, TNFalpha, PGE). These effects are amplified by putting clodronate in monolayer liposomes. This drug, therefore, has to be considered as adjuvant in arthritis therapy, whose origin can be linked to a strong osteoclastic activation caused by an increase of cytokines and the RANKL/OPG relationship. It is clear that clodronate can work on cytokine at first and on osteoclastic effector in the end. The drug has been used "off-label" for decades intravenously in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS type 1) in relation to schemes that change according to different Authors and according to cumulative doses ranging from 3 to 5 g. The introduction on the market of the 200 mg i.m. formulation could allow to get more practical but equally effective schemes. For example, we used this scheme: 200 mg/day for 10 days and then 200 mg every other day for 20 days (cumulative dose of 4 g in a month). Said scheme can be repeated in the following months in particular cases. Results, as for efficacy and lack of relapses, show that clodronate is the leader drug for this syndrome. In recent years, relationship between costs and benefits has started to matter, especially after the creation of some algorithms, such as FRAX, that let us choose patients with a higher fracture risk in 10 years, and after pharmaceutic-economic models that let us calculate FRAX intervention threshold, on the basis of drug price and monitoring, antifracture efficacy, quality of life and how much a community can or wants to spend. In this respect, a sub-analysis of McCloskey's study on people over the age of 75, conducted on 3974 subjects, shows that clodronate is more efficient with patients with a higher fracture risk, calculated according to FRAX. Furthermore, another study by McCloskey revealed that, for a 100-pound/year drug (very similar to clodronate), 'cost effective' intervention threshold is about 7-10%. In conclusion, clodronate prevents fractures, decrease osteo-articular pain, is easy to handle, tolerable and had a great cost/benefit relationship
Osteoimmunology in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis: potential effects of tofacitinib on bone involvement
No full textChronic inflammation, such as that present in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), leads to aberrations in bone remodeling, which is mediated by several signaling pathways, including the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway. In this light, pro-inflammatory cytokines are now clearly implicated in these processes as they can perturb normal bone remodeling through their action on osteoclasts and osteoblasts at both intra- and extra-articular skeletal sites. As a selective inhibitor of JAK1 and JAK3, tofacitinib has the potential to play a role in the management of rheumatic diseases such as RA and PsA. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that tofacitinib can inhibit disturbed osteoclastogenesis in RA, which suggests that targeting the JAK-STAT pathway may help limit bone erosion. Evidence from clinical trials with tofacitinib in RA and PsA is encouraging, as tofacitinib treatment has been shown to decrease articular bone erosion. In this review, the authors summarize current knowledge on the relationship between the immune system and the skeleton before examining the involvement of JAK-STAT signaling in bone homeostasis as well as the available preclinical and clinical evidence on the benefits of tofacitinib on prevention of bone involvement in RA and PsA.Key Points• Chronic inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) leads to disturbances in bone remodeling• Bone remodeling is mediated by several signaling pathways, including the JAK-STAT pathway• Tofacitinib, a selective inhibitor of JAK1 and JAK3, is active in RA and PsA and may help limit systemic bone loss through inhibiting disturbed osteoclastogenesis• Clinical trials show that tofacitinib reduces articular bone erosion
Could this be the pioneering case of short-blanket syndrome? Comment on: Development of ultrasound enthesitis score to identify patients with enthesitis having spondyloarthritis: prospective, double-blinded, controlled study. Milutinovic et al. Clin Exp
No full textOsteoarthritis and osteoporosis: correlations between two clinical entities
Full text linkOsteoarthritis (OA) and osteoporosis (OP) are two common muscoloskeletal diseases, especially in the elderly, which have a significant socio-economic impact. Both conditions are multi-factorial. OP is a systemic disease of the skeleton characterized by reduced mass and qualitative alterations of the bone, leading to increased risk of fracture; OA is an imbalance in tissue homeostasis, which leads to cartilage deterioration, sclerosis of subchondral bone and osteophytosis..
Tendon involvement in patients with ochronosis: an ultrasonographic study.
No full textOchronosis is the musculoskeletal manifestation of alcaptonuria, a rare autosomal recessive disorder with an estimated prevalence of below 1:250 000.1 Alcaptonuria is associated with deficient homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase (HGO) activity in the liver,2 causing production of large quantities of homogentisic acid (HGA). In urine and tissues, HGA oxidises to benzoquinones, which in turn form melanin-like polymers. Tendons are sites of ochronotic pigment deposition because of their high collagen content.3 Several cases of tendon and ligament ruptures in alcaptonuria have been reported.1 4 5 To our knowledge, no studies have been carried out regarding tendon pathology in ochronosis. Ultrasonography (US) is an inexpensive, repeatable, non-invasive exam that permits accurate visualisation of tendons and ligaments. Our ..
Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: how frequent is the idiopathic form? An ultrasonographic study in a cohort of patients.
No full textOBJECTIVE: Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) is the second most frequent focal neuropathy of the arm. The aim of our study was to establish the frequency of anatomical changes of the cubital tunnel capable of causing UNE.
METHODS: Ninety-one consecutive patients affected by UNE, as established by neurophysiological studies, were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent ultrasonographic examination of the elbow, paying particular attention to the cubital tunnel, which was studied with either static or dynamic scans.
RESULT: Fifty-four of the 91 patients (59.3%) had at least one anatomical alteration of the cubital tunnel. The changes observed in our patients were: subluxation of the ulnar nerve (18.7%), luxation of the ulnar nerve (9.9%), presence of osteophytes (6.6%), presence of accessory muscle (8.8%), articular ganglion (1.1%), post-traumatic lesions (3.3%), presence of osseous fragment (1.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: A possible cause of ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow was found in more than half of the patients. Joint ultrasonography is indispensable for the identification of such alterations as it allows for both static and dynamic evaluation of the ulnar nerve
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
