1,721,027 research outputs found

    Berglin, E

    No full text

    Myocardial metabolism assessed by microdialysis: A prospective randomized study in on- and off-pump coronary bypass surgery

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare energetic metabolism in the myocardium during coronary surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass by means of microdialysis. METHODS: Twenty-six low-risk patients were prospectively randomized to off-pump versus on-pump surgery. Microdialysis was used to sample myocardial interstitial fluid during and for 23 hours after surgery. RESULTS: Preoperative characteristics and clinical outcome were similar in both groups. Blood glucose and lactate did not differ between groups throughout the observation time. During surgery, intramyocardial levels of glucose, pyruvate and urea were unaffected in off-pump patients, while the same substances significantly decreased (p<0.05) in on-pump patients during cardioplegic arrest, and increased during reperfusion. Interstitial lactate levels were higher during off-pump surgery (p<0.05). From 3 to 15 hours after surgery, intramyocardial concentrations of glucose, urea and lactate were higher in off-pump patients (p<0.001), while pyruvate was higher in on-pump patients (p<0.01). Intramyocardial lactate/pyruvate ratio never differed between groups. Postoperatively, cumulative blood release of troponin-T was significantly higher in the on-pump group (p<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Microdialysis could demonstrate significant differences in energetic metabolism between the two groups. Our data confirm and might help in explaining the lower release of myocardial ischemic markers after off-pump surgery

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore