1,720,965 research outputs found

    Nocturnal panic and recent life events.

    No full text
    Recent research has hypothesized an association between traumatic events and nocturnal panic (NP). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the onset of nocturnal panic attacks is associated with a higher frequency of and/or greater severity of stressful or traumatic life events than that of patients with panic disorders (PDs) who experience daytime panic attacks (DPs) while awake. A secondary aim was to investigate whether NP is associated with specific life events at the onset of the disorder. Our sample comprised 129 subjects with PD (DSM-IV). We investigated the number and types of stressful life events that occurred in the year prior to PD onset using a semistructured interview. Of the sample, 28.7% had recurrent nocturnal panic attacks (NP group). Subjects with and without recurrent NP did not differ on any sociodemographic or clinical characteristic. Neither the number nor type of life event distinguished those with or without NP. The subgroup of patients with PD with recurrent NP appears to represent a variant of PD with a possible increased vulnerability to conditions of diminished arousal as a trigger of panic attacks. However, the hypothesis that this vulnerability might be determined by life events that occur in the period preceding PD onset was not supported by the findings of this study

    Axis I and II comorbidities in subjects with and without nocturnal panic

    No full text
    Our purpose in this study was to compare the prevalence and pattern of Axis I and II comorbidities between patients with and without nocturnal panic (NP) attacks. One hundred and sixteen subjects with panic disorder (PD; according to DSM-IV criteria) were included: We assessed Axis I and II comorbidities using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I and II disorders, respectively. Of the sample, 27.6% of subjects had recurrent nocturnal panic attacks (NP group). Subjects with NP did not differ from those without in any sociodemographic or clinical characteristics. In the sample (94 subjects), 81% had at least one lifetime comorbid Axis I disorder, without significant differences between subjects with and without nocturnal panic even when considering comorbidity rates for single disorders; a trend toward significance was found for anorexia nervosa and somatization disorder, which both were more frequent among subjects with NP. Concerning Axis II disorders, 49.1% of the sample (57 subjects) met the criteria for at least one personality disorder, without significant differences between patients with and without NP. No significant differences were detected in comorbidity rates for any single Axis II personality disorder. Personality might play a relevant role in influencing treatment approaches to PD, but it does not appear to be a differential focus of concern in patients with compared to those without NP

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore