1,722,201 research outputs found
Bennett, K C, 407992
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/371314Surname: BENNETT
Given Name(s) or Initials: K C
Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 407992
Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 44544181809
Item: [2016.0049.03641] "Bennett, K C, 407992
Bennett, K J, 401409
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/371311Surname: BENNETT
Given Name(s) or Initials: K J
Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 401409
Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 46770181806
Item: [2016.0049.03638] "Bennett, K J, 401409
Temporal coordination of the reach to grasp movement with simultaneous perturbation of target position and size
No full textAustralian Jn of Psycholog
English-medium journals in Serbia: editors' perspectives
Full text linkThis chapter examines the growing phenomenon of English-medium journals in non-Anglophone countries, few of which achieve considerable international visibility as measured by inclusion in SCI and SSCI lists. The study investigates this phenomenon in Serbia, where a similar rise in English-medium journals is taking place, by exploring the views of editors of English-medium journals published in Serbia. Editors have been chosen as informants for the study because of their influential position as shapers of the practices and policies of the journals they edit and because of their privileged access to journal-related information that is not publicly available. The participants were fifteen editors of English-medium journals in Serbia in a range of disciplines. In addition to gathering bibliometric data about the participants’ journals, face-to-face interviews were conducted with five editors, and ten editors responded to a list of open-ended questions by email. This chapter reports and discusses two major themes: (i) the editors’ perspectives on the motivations behind the journals’ adoption of English and their related goals enabled by the use of English, and (ii) the editors views on the nature of their journals vis-à-vis the national/international dichotomy. It is shown that English-medium journals in Serbia constitute a diverse category, with different histories, goals and practices related to the use of English. Editors’ perspectives show that the use of English as the medium of publication is motivated by a range of goals at different levels, from local institutional goals to goals related to international exchange, as well as by both ‘push’ and ‘pull’ factors. In terms of the nature of English-medium journals on the semiperiphery, it is argued that they should be understood as a translocal phenomenon due to the knowledge flows they enable between various local contexts as well as with higher-than-local levels. The chapter closes by discussing the implications of the findings about the roles English-medium journals play in the local academic community, on the semiperiphery, and in global academic publishing
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
