1,720,995 research outputs found

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Analytical Evaluation Of The Novel Helena V8 Capillary Electrophoresis System.

    No full text
    Background: Capillary electrophoresis (CE) is used for the screening of protein abnormalities in serum and other biological fluids. Since the Helena V8 CE system has been recently commercialized, the aim of this study was to assess its analytical performance under routine laboratory conditions. Methods: The evaluation of Helena V8 (Medical Systems S.p.A., Genova, Italy) for protein fractions (i.e., albumin, alpha-1, alpha-2, beta-1, beta-2, gamma, albumin/globulin ratio [A/G]) and monoclonal component (MC) quantification included imprecision studies, linearity, and comparison with Sebia Capillarys (Sebia, Evry Cedex, France), which was considered the reference analyzer. Results: The imprecision of Helena V8 on all parameters was comprised between 0.8% and 15.2%; the linearity was excellent up to an MC value of 14.5% (r=1.00). The comparison studies showed excellent Spearman’s correlations with Sebia Capillarys, with coefficients comprised between 0.84 and 0.99 (all p<0.001). The mean bias of Helena V8 versus Sebia Capillarys was -0.02% for G/A, -0.2% for albumin, 2.1% for alpha-1, 0.1% for alpha-2, 0.3% for beta-1, -0.2% for beta-2, -2.2% for gamma and 1 g/L for MC. Conclusions: The results of this evaluation attest that Helena V8 is a suitable alternative for routine separation and quantification of protein fractions and monoclonal component
    corecore