353,577 research outputs found
S. D. Barnes to Horace Kephart, May 19, 1898
No full textIn this letter of May 19, 1898, S. D. Barnes is replying to Horace Kephart. Barnes is happy that Kephart will consider him for his company of sharpshooters. He says that he will practice and study tactics and wonders where he can find Upton’s tactics. Barnes explains that his eldest son, Eddie, has died and he would be grateful to be a part of the Spanish-American War
W. J. Barnes
No full textEnglish, Scottish and Australian Bank staff, photographed in Darwin. Back row, L-R: W. Parker, W.H. Lawrie, W.W. Barnes, front row, L-R: S.S. Godfrey, S.E. Coben.Chaffey, Jan.Date:192
Repositioning the graphic designer as researcher
No full textIn academic terms, the discipline of graphic design is relatively young. Consequently the position of the discipline within academic territory, and the role of the designer, continue to be debated. In part, these debates have been a product of attempts to define and defend the discipline’s borders from within, in order to establish a sense of the role of graphic design and the graphic designer as commensurate with other disciplines both within and beyond art and design. In recent years graphic designers have variously been defined as ‘authors’, ‘producers’ and ‘readers’, yet none of these definitions seem to have provided any kind of productive or lasting impact within the academy. This paper suggests that rather than continue to seek territorial definitions and positions from within, it could be more productive to look beyond the confines of the discipline. Gaining a broader, interdisciplinary perspective on, and understanding of, qualitative research methods from other disciplines may enable the graphic designer to more fully position his or her practice within the wider academy. Such a perspective could help facilitate the repositioning and redefinition of the graphic designer as ‘researcher’ - a move that would be productive in relation to the future development of postgraduate research within the discipline
Milton Barnes to Rhoda Barnes, November 27, 1863.
No full textPublic domain. There are no known use restrictions.Letter to Rhoda Barnes from her husband Milton Barnes, stationed in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Milton recounts the battle at Missionary Ridge fought on November 25. He mentions many of the commanding officers involved including General Braxton Bragg and Major General Ulysses S. Grant. Milton lists those killed or wounded from his regiment
S. D. Barnes to Horace Kephart, May 15, 1898
No full textIn this letter of May 15, 1898, S. D. Barnes writes Horace Kephart addressing him as Friend Kep. Barnes makes it known that he is qualified and would like to be on the list as a sharpshooter for the Spanish-American War even though he cannot be present in Saint Louis to practice in the drills.Bald Knob, Ark.
May 15, 1898
Friend Kep:-
I reckon I can make
a possible [ten] on Spaniards at 200 yds.,
and I know I can march hard, live
on crawfish, and mix up biscuit in
the flour sack. if there is any
chance for me, I want to go with you all.
Have been too long in the swamps to
pass a strict examination; but this
may not be insisted upon in the ease
of sharpshooters. think that I could
stand more “Cuba” than some of the
unseasoned athletes from the high and
dry North. as I have a living to make,
I could not come to St. Louis to drill,
but I would like to be on the list
and could stand in readiness to go
when needed. is there a chance for
me? yours, S. J. Barne
Milton Barnes to Rhoda Barnes, April 3, 1862.
No full textPublic domain. There are no known use restrictions.Letter to Rhoda Barnes from her husband Milton Barnes. Milton describes the train journey from Ohio to the Shenandoah Valley in Virginia. He mentions places where they stopped including his hometown of Barnsville, Ohio as well as the country traveled through. Upon arrival in Viriginia he notes seeing Union officers Major General John C. Fremont, Brigadier General Benjamin Franklin Kelley and Brigadier General William S. Rosencrans
Letter from S. W. Colson to J. O. Barnes
No full textLetter from S. W. Colson to J. O. Barnes. The one-page handwritten note is dated 2 May 1910. There is a typewritten transcript of the correspondence in the item PDF
Quarters
No full textBook of photographs b/w and colour that revolves around the concepts of home and domesticity. The book is the result of a collaboration of five RCA students from the Printmaking Department of RCA - the late Sue Barnes, Shelagh Sartin, Susie Allen, Jonnie Turpie and Stephen Mumberson
Macrophthalmus (Mareotis) Barnes 1967
No full textMacrophthalmus (Mareotis) Barnes, 1967 (Figs. 3C, 4A) Large, up to 40 mm carapace breadth; ocular peduncles elongate but not projecting beyond lateral carapace margins, much longer than breadth of front; front narrow, usually constricted between bases of ocular peduncles, where its breadth is 8–15% distance between external orbital angles; ischium of external maxilliped> 1.5 times length of merus (usually 1.7–2.5 times); carapace with breadth 1.3–1.7 times length (and in one species> 1.8 times length), with large, broad-based, subrectangular anterolateral teeth, with lateral margins subparallel or arched (so that greatest carapace breadth not across external orbital angles or even second anterolateral teeth), with longitudinal and/or transverse rows of granules and/or hairs on branchial regions but without clumps of granules; central region of posterior border of epistome straight, with marked concavity or (in some populations of one species) with a central protuberance; males of one species with stridulatory apparatus as described below in Paramareotis; fingers of male chelae usually elongate with index downflexed and with differentiated teeth on both index and dactylus or on dactylus only. Intertidal, usually in relatively soft muds. Twelve species are included which have been divided between two subgroups on morphological grounds (the groups A and B of Komai et al., 1995):Published as part of Barnes, R. S. K., 2010, A Review Of The Sentinel And Allied Crabs (Crustacea: Brachyura: Macrophthalmidae), With Particular Reference To The Genus Macrophthalmus, pp. 31-49 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 58 (1) on pages 40-41, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.450830
Macrophthalmus (Tasmanoplax) Barnes 1967
No full textMacrophthalmus (Tasmanoplax) Barnes, 1967 (Fig. 5A) Medium-sized, up to 30+ mm carapace breadth; ocular peduncles elongate but not projecting beyond lateral carapace margins, longer than breadth of front; front moderately narrow, not constricted between bases of ocular peduncles, where its breadth is ca. 20% distance between external orbital angles; ischium of external maxilliped ca.1.2 times length of merus; carapace with breadth 1.5–1.6 times length, with lateral margins subparallel, with large, broad-based, subrectangular anterolateral teeth, branchial regions with transverse and longitudinal rows of granules; central region of posterior border of epistome with large convexity; males without stridulatory apparatus; fingers of male chelae elongate with index downflexed and with clearly differentiated tooth on dactylus only. Intertidal in soft sediments. This is a monotypic subgenus for M. latifrons Haswell, 1882, restricted to south-eastern Australia, the only macrophthalmid in that region. It appears to differ behaviourly from other Macrophthalmus in that allocleaning (foraging on the carapace or walking legs of other conspecific individuals) is not displayed (Kitaura & Wada, 2004).Published as part of Barnes, R. S. K., 2010, A Review Of The Sentinel And Allied Crabs (Crustacea: Brachyura: Macrophthalmidae), With Particular Reference To The Genus Macrophthalmus, pp. 31-49 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 58 (1) on page 42, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.450830
- …
