1,721,173 research outputs found
Intervención federal a las provincias
Get PDFFil: Badeni, Gregorio. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Cátedra Derecho Constitucional. Buenos Aires, Argentin
Kiri Badeni markkrahv Wilhelm'ile
Get PDFSaksa-Rooma keiserWilhelm, 1593-1677, Badeni markkrahv, kammerkohtunikMansfelti ja Haeckeni kohtuasjast. Keisri allkir
La aplicación de la ley penal más benigna y los delitos de lesa humanidad
Get PDFFil: Badeni, Gregorio. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Buenos Aires, ArgentinaDossier "Algunas miradas sobre la Constitución y el Derecho Internacional
Omorgus (Omorgus) badeni
No full text<i>Omorgus (Omorgus) badeni</i> (Harold, 1872) <p>(Figure 3 a-c, 9)</p> <p> <i>Trox badeni</i> Harold, 1872: 83 (original description); Arrow 1912: 54 (catalogue); Blackwelder 1944: 218 (catalogue); Vaurie 1962: 147 (as junior synonym of <i>Omorgus borrei</i>) <i>Omorgus</i> (<i>Omorgus</i>) <i>badeni</i>: Scholtz 1990: 1416 (revalidated, redescribed and lectotype designated); Zídek 2013: 7 (catalogue); Zídek 2017: 98 (catalogue).</p> <p> <i>Type material examined</i></p> <p> Lectotype (<i>♂</i>, RBINS, through photographs, Figure 3 a-c): First label [white, with red border]: ‘ Omorgus badeni /(Harold)/det Scholtz 1990 [Scholtz’s handwriting]/ LECTOTYPE’ [typeset in red]. Second label [beige, with green border]: ‘Badeni/ Ceara /Bras. Sept. Baden [Candèze’s handwriting]. Third label [white]: det. [typeset] Harold 1872 [unknown handwriting]/ T. badeni /Harold/Type/ Ceara Brasil’ [Harold’s handwriting]. Fourth label [red]: ‘Coll. R. I. Sc. N. B./Brazil [typeset] Ceara /ex. Baden/ ex coll. Candèze’ [unknown handwriting]. Type locality: <b>BRAZIL: Ceará</b>.</p> <p> <i>Additional material examined</i></p> <p> <b>BRAZIL: Rio Grande do Norte</b>, Parnamirim, iii.1950, M.F.A leg. (1 MZSP). <b>Paraíba</b>, Mamanguape, Reserva Biológica Guaribas [Biological Reserve of Guaribas], 6°41’S 35° 10 <i>ʹ</i> W, tabuleiro forest [type of vegetation], pitfall with faeces, xi.2001, A.A. Andres leg. (1 <i>♂</i> CEMT). <b>Bahia</b>, Sento Sé, Parque Nacional do Boqueirão da OnÇa, 09°55’S 41°37 <i>ʹ</i> W, ii– iii.2014, Salomão leg. (3 <i>♀</i>, 2 <i>♂</i> CEMT; 1 <i>♂</i> CVMD).</p> <p> <i>Diagnosis</i></p> <p> <i>Omorgus badeni</i> is similar in appearance to <i>O. borrei</i>. It can be distinguished from the latter by the presence of round shiny black tubercles on the odd-numbered elytral costae. <i>Omorgus borrei</i> have the odd-numbered costae marked by distinct flat lustrous areas. For a more detailed treatment of <i>O. badeni</i>, see Scholtz (1990).</p> <p> <i>Geographic distribution</i></p> <p> In Brazil, <i>Omorgus badeni</i> occurs in the BA, CE, PE and RN states (Caatinga biome) (Figure 9).</p>Published as part of <i>Costa-Silva, Vinícius, Strümpher, Werner P. & Vaz-de-Mello, Fernando Z., 2021, Review of the Brazilian species of Omorgus Erichson, 1847 (Coleoptera: Trogidae: Omorginae), pp. 1993-2024 in Journal of Natural History 54 (31 - 32)</i> on pages 2001-2002, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2020.1833999, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5028835">http://zenodo.org/record/5028835</a>
Müller Pál badeni Decapoda-gyűjteménye a Magyar Természettudományi Múzeumban
Get PDFA Középső-Paratethys üledékei elterjedtek Magyarországon, leggyakrabban a badeni (15,97–12,6 millió évvel ezelőtti) üledékekkel találkozhatunk. Az akkori sekélytengeri környezetek nagyon változatos élővilágnak nyújtottak otthont, köztük a tízlábú rákoknak, melyek maradványai gyakran megtalálhatók a badeni rétegeket feltáró lelőhelyeken. Magyarország régóta fontos szerepet játszik a kainozoós Decapoda kutatásban, elsősorban Lőrenthey Imre és Müller Pál gyűjteményének és kutatásának köszönhetően. Müller Pál rendkívül gazdag Decapoda gyűjteménye a 2015-ben bekövetkezett halála után akaratának megfelelően a Magyar Természettudományi Múzeumba került. Anyagának legjelentősebb részét a magyarországi badeni rétegekből gyűjtötte, és a példányok nagyrészt Budapestről, vagy Budapest környékéről származnak (Tétényi-fennsík, Diósd, Biatorbágy, Budafok, Rákos, Keresztúri út, Örs vezér tere, Kerepesi út, Gyakorló út, Thököly út, Mező Imre út = Fiumei út, Telepy utca). A Visegrádhegységből (Visegrád), a Börzsönyből (Nagymaros Törökmező, Zebegény, és Szob), és a Cserhátból (Mátraverebély, Szentkút és Sámsonháza) származó anyagok szintén jelentősek. A dunántúli badeni lelőhelyekről (Nyírád, Balatonakali-40, Kishajmás, Fertőrákos-21) viszont eddig nagyon kevés tízlábú rák maradványa került elő. Az eddigi vizsgálatok alapján csaknem száz Decapoda fajt lehetett elkülöníteni a magyarországi badeniben, a Gebiidea (1 faj), Axiidea (9 faj), Anomura (20 faj), és Brachyura (69 faj) alrendek képviselőiből. A fajok mindegyikét részletesen feldolgoztuk a közelmúltban megjelent monográfiában, revideált leírásokkal, elterjedési adatokkal, valamint fényképes ábrázolásokkal, különös tekintettel a típuspéldányokra. A 99 Decapodafaj rendszertani áttekintése mellett részletesen ismertettük azokat a magyarországi lelőhelyeket, ahol badeni tízlábú rák maradványok kerültek elő. A rendszertani leírások mellett határozókulcsot készítettünk valamennyi előkerült fajhoz (különkülön a carapax és az olló maradványokra). A taxonómiai vizsgálatok során az eddigitől eltérő genushoz soroltunk tíz fajt (új kombinációk), és számos faj esetében megállapítottuk, hogy azok megegyeznek korábban leírt fajokkal (szinonímák)
Derechos y garantías : un cambio innecesario e ineficaz
Get PDFFil: Badeni, Gregorio. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho; Argentina.Según el autor de este artículo, la modificación de la Constitución era innecesaria y en diez años
demostró, además, su ineficacia. No sólo no redujo los poderes presidenciales, sino que los
incrementó de una manera jamás vista en la historia del país y, a la luz de los años de crisis, tampoco
otorgó dinamismo a la actividad gubernamental. En cuanto a la incorporación de los llamados nuevos
derechos y garantías, el tercer objetivo perseguido por los reformadores, todos estaban implícitamente
reconocidos en el texto constitucional original. Esta experiencia debería desalentar futuras reformas de
la Constitución
Chalcoprionus badeni Bates 1875
No full text1. Chalcoprionus badeni Bates, 1875 Type locality — Colombia, Cali: Frontino. (MNHN). Distribution — Colombia. Chalcoprionus badeni Bates, 1875: 274; Lameere, 1883: 8 (cat.); 1904b: 340; 1912b: 167; 1919: 93, pl. 3, figs. 2, 3; Bleuzen, 1994: 34, pl. 9, figs. 2, 3. Macrodontia Lepeletier & AudinetServille, 1830 Macrodontia Lepeletier & AudinetServille in Lacordaire, 1830: 139; AudinetServille, 1832: 139; Gory, 1839: 124; Laporte, 1840: 390; Blanchard, 1845: 138; 1848: 210; Thomson, 1864: 293, 475; Schjodte, 1865: 195; Lacordaire, 1869: 78; Chenu, 1870: 304; Girard, 1873: 719; Bates, 1879: 5; Lameere, 1904b: 322; 1919: 91; Melzer, 1919: 54; Williams, 1929: 143; Bleuzen, 1990: 9 (key spp.); 1994: 21. Typespecies— Cerambyx cervicornis Linnaeus, 1758 (monotypy). Macrodontus Gistel, 1848: 129. Typespecies— Cerambyx cervicornis Linnaeus, 1758 (monotypy).Published as part of MONNÉ, MIGUEL A., 2006, Catalogue of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of the Neotropical Region. Part III. Subfamilies Parandrinae, Prioninae, Anoplodermatinae, Aseminae Spondylidinae, Lepturinae, Oxypeltinae, and addenda to the Cerambycinae and Lamiinae,, pp. 1-244 in Zootaxa 1212 (1) on pages 42-43, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1212.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/506497
Pachycerus badeni
No full text<i>PACHYCERUS BADENI</i> (FAUST, 1888) <p> <i>Gonocleonus Badeni</i> Faust, 1888: 288.</p> <p> <i>Pachycerus spinipennis</i> Fairmaire, 1897: 168. <i>Pachycerus Badeni</i>: Faust, 1904: 222.</p> <p> <i>Cleonus (Pachycerus) Badeni</i>: Csiki, 1934: 52.</p> <p> <i>Lectotype male (designated here):</i> 1. square blank gold label; 2. Madagascar Baden (Faust’s hw); 3. Badeni Faust (Faust’s hw) (note: 1–3 were glued on a new label); 4. Coll. J. Faust, Ankauf 1900 (pr, light blue); 5. Staatl. Museum für Tierkunde Dresden (pr); 6. Type (pr, red); 7. <i>Gonocleonus badeni</i> Faust, 1888, Lectotypus, 2007 Meregalli des. (pr, red) (SMTD).</p> <p> <i>Paralectotypes:</i> 2 ♀. Same labels as 1–6 of the lectotype; 7. <i>Gonocleonus badeni</i> Faust, 1888, Paralectotypus, 2007 Meregalli des. (pr, red) (SMTD).</p> <p> <i>Type:</i> Three syntypes are preserved in Faust’s collection, all with the same indication: ‘ Madagascar, Baden’. The male is designated here as the lectotype, the two females are designated as paralectotypes.</p> <p> <i>Measurements:</i> Body length excluding rostrum: 8.28 mm. Rostrum: length, 1.62 mm; width, 0.95 mm; ratio, 1.71. Pronotum: length, 2.10 mm; width, 2.87 mm; ratio, 0.73. Elytra: length, 5.57 mm; width, 3.52 mm; ratio, 1.59. Ratio of elytral to pronotal length: 2.65 (lectotype).</p> <p> <i>Redescription (Figs 57–69):</i> Body elliptical, of small size, integument glossy, and blackish on rostrum, pronotum, and elytral sides, dark reddish on median part of elytra, legs, and antennae, covered with lanceolate simple scales (Figs 57–58). Rostrum short and robust, subquadrate in transverse section, dorsolateral margins keeled, finely punctured, slightly sinuate, and moderately convergent from base to antennal insertion, outward curved from antennal insertion to apex, median keel obtusely raised, punctured, broadened anteriorly, and interrupted at antennal insertion, all keels sharply interrupted before head, dorsum with two deep furrows, delimited by median and dorsolateral keels, apex depressed, epistoma triangular, prominent at centre; surface minutely wrinkled and punctured, finely sculptured; rostrum in lateral view straight up to antennal insertion and strongly curved downwards at apex, thickened apicad, dorsolateral keels straight, linear; upper margin of scrobes obtuse, linearly directed towards lower part of eyes, and touching eyes, lower margin parallel with upper margin, reaching underside at basal third; scrobes deep, glossy, surface in front of eyes roughly sculptured. Vestiture composed of dense white-greyish lanceolate acuminate scales, usually forward-directed in the furrows and outward-directed at apex, also present and less dense on punctures of keels, epistoma with long, moderately erect golden hair-like setae; sides with sparse, narrower scales in front of eyes, and slender, longer scales on pregenae (Figs 59–60). Antennae relatively short, sparsely scaly, scape moderately curved forwards, regularly thickened from base to apex; funicle of nearly uniform thickness; segment I subcylindrical, slightly longer than wide, and slightly narrower than apex of scape, segments II–VII weakly transverse, progressively slightly widened; club long and elliptical, acuminate, finely hairy, excepting on scaly base of segment I (Fig. 66). Head large, finely punctured, vertex flat, with a narrow scarcely distinct central pit; eyes large, moderately convex, in dorsal view upper margins subparallel, weakly convergent behind; vestiture composed of sparse setae, thickened along upper margin of eyes. Pronotum transverse, base oblique, shortly prominent at middle towards scutellum, sides straight, parallel from base to apex, with a strongly prominent cylindrical lateral bulge beyond middle of length, and an obtuse subapical hump, apex straight, not prominent over head, postocular lobes round, weakly distinct; dorsum on disc with a rhomboidal pattern shallowly impressed, delimited by narrow, moderately raised ridges, distinctly angular at middle, curved and not joined at apex, joined at base, central part roughly sculptured, with a very narrow middle line, higher forward, flattened and broadened at middle, nearly indistinct in basal half; surface in rhomboidal impression with irregular large punctures, barely delimited, anterior part with two large glossy granules, median part with a few other irregularly delimited granules; dorsolateral surface, by side of margins of discal impression, slightly impressed anteriorly, with some irregular granules, and a narrow, raised vertical ridge joining the angle of discal ridges with lateral bulges; base flattened, more glossy, with dense regular punctures; sides smooth, flattened, regularly punctured. Vestiture composed of elongate glossy whitish scales, sparsely disposed on discal impression, reaching base near median keel, absent from basal dorso–lateral plate, and larger, thickened on anterior dorso–lateral impression and on upper part of sides, forming a lateral stripe broadly curved towards dorsum on middle (Fig. 62). Scutellum strongly prominent, elongate, bare, glossy. Elytra elongate, in lateral view dorsum weakly and regularly curved, declivity very feeble, nearly indistinct; at base narrower than base of pronotum, sharply broadened at humeri, maximum width shortly behind humeri, sides nearly parallel up to middle and regularly curved to apex; apex with an acute, distinct short projection in front of interval 3; surface smooth, finely punctured, without granules; intervals barely convex, odd intervals slightly wider than even, as wide as striae, particularly intervals 3 and 5, these distinctly more raised and slightly curved at base, interval 5 interrupted in a slightly raised hump followed by a transverse impression before apex, interval 7 more raised in basal quarter, flattened behind; striae deeply impressed, with seriate round punctures. Vestiture composed of glossy elliptical simple scales, relatively dense and uniformly disposed, not hiding integument, absent from an irregular median stripe between intervals 4 and 8, but usually with a round densely scaly spot on interval 6, and absent from impression behind apex of interval 5; setae extremely short, indistinct, except on lateral margin near apex. Legs slender, with elliptical acuminate simple scales on femora, tibiae and tarsi and sparse setae on internal side of tibiae and tarsi; femora slender, scarcely thickened at middle; fore tibiae rectilinear, scarcely broadened at apex, with apical denticles; middle and hind tibiae slightly more robust; tarsi with segment I triangular, segment II moderately transverse, segment III as long as wide, broadly lobed; hind tarsi with all segments longer; underside of segment III with nearly complete pad of orange scales, also present in a small patch on segment II; onychium longer than tarsal segments on fore tarsi, as long as tarsal segments on hind tarsi; claws very weakly divergent, thick, connate at middle. Ventrites convex, I and II of equal length and together longer than III–V together, III and IV very short, convex, V short, transverse; vestiture composed of very long, lanceolate whitish simple scales and, on ventrite V, semierect hair–like setae (Fig. 64). Aedeagus tubular, median lobe scarcely curved, shortly narrowed at apex, apical lamella not expanded (Figs 61, 63, 68). Sternite VIII of female with basal apodeme shorter than length of lamina, arms broadly widened, sclerotization dense in apical half of lamina; spermatheca with thick cornu, curved at 90° with respect of nodulus, this large, thick (Fig. 67); hemisternites broad, with distinct subapical angle, regularly tapering at apex, styli apical, elongate (Fig. 65).</p> <p> <i>Variation:</i> The three specimens examined all have rather uniform sculpture and vestiture: one of the females is smaller, 7.0 mm long, and has the pronotum with a slightly less raised sculpture, and with the vestiture of scales on the pronotum and elytra more dense. The other female has the sternite VIII with a longer apodeme, as long as the lamina.</p> <p> <i>Affinities: Pachycerus badeni</i> is closely related to <i>P. sahelicus</i> sp. nov. The differences between them are detailed in the description of the latter species. These two species, probably together with <i>P. efflatouni</i>, form a monophyletic group, differentiated from the other taxa of the genus by the small size, the simple scales, the absence of a prominent hump above the eyes, and the more or less prominent lateral humps on the pronotum.</p> <p> <i>Distribution (Fig. 108):</i> Known so far only from the three type specimens collected by Baden in an unknown locality of Madagascar, and by those used by Fairmaire for his description of <i>P. spinipennis</i>.</p>Published as part of <i>Meregalli, Massimo, 2009, Revision of the Indo-African Pachycerus Schoenherr, 1823, with a description of four new species (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Lixinae), pp. 295-325 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 157 (2)</i> on pages 309-312, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00506.x, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5443527">http://zenodo.org/record/5443527</a>
Plusiotis alfredolaui, a new sibling species of P. badeni Boucard (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Rutelinae)
No full textPlusiotis alfredolaui is described from the vicinity of Fortin de las Flores, Veracruz, Mexico. It is very closely related to P. badeni Boucard, and is nearly indistinguishable externally. The male and female genitalia, however, are very different from those of P. badeni
The manor house of Helena and Józef Badeni at Wadów
No full textThe manor house of Helena and Józef Badeni at Wadów has so far not received monographic treatment. Historical studies and conservation treatment reports as well as popular works date the construction of the house to the year 1874 and ascribe its design to the architect Antoni Łuszczkiewicz. Better documented is the twentiethcentury history of the Wadów estate and its house, but also these data are not free from inaccuracies. In 1873 the village was sold to Józef Badeni who died shortly afterwards (in 1878). The coats of arms of Badeni and his wife, Helena née Wężyk, depicted on the manor’s entrance porch suggest that the building was erected between 1873 and 1878. The analysis of the architectural forms of the edifice has unequivocally indicated that its architect must have been trained on the models of Karl Friedrich Schinkel and was under influence of the current which was originated by Schinkel in the architecture of Berlin in the second half of the nineteenth century. Graphic models can be identified for particular architectural details used by the architect in the building.
The manor house at Wadów exhibits also close similarities with the house of the Wężyk family at Minoga, designed by Filip Pokutyński in 1859. A detailed comparative analysis of both houses has concluded that the design of the Badeni manor is of lesser quality and hence its authorship cannot be ascribed to Pokutyński. A comparison of characteristic elements appearing in the Wadów manor with their counterparts in independent realisations by Antoni Łuszczkiewicz has confirmed the attribution of the Wadów house to this architect. It also revealed that the patrons themselves must have significantly contributed to the shaping of their new home; they apparently instructed the architect to model the Wadów house after the manor of the Wężyk family at Minoga
- …
