11,807 research outputs found
[Crime Scene Section Form by J. B. Hicks]
No full textCrime Scene Section Form by J. B. Hicks, ordering photographs of ID cards and addresses
Dr. Doug Hicks – Faculty Author Interview
No full textThe Podcasts@Boatwright debut author is Dr. Doug Hicks, associate professor of leadership studies and religion and executive director of the Bonner Center for Civic Engagement. His new book, With God on All Sides: Leadership in a Devout and Diverse America, describes how our various religious traditions can help build common ground in America and how leaders can and should deal with religious diversity
Letter from Catherine Hicks & John Hicks to James B. Finley
No full textCatherine and John Hicks have heard that Finley might be coming to Kansas to see his Indian friends, and they are delighted to hear it. Many years have passed since we first met in the wilderness of Sandusky and learned to sing praises to the Redeemer. It would mean a great deal to see Finley before they die. Abstract Number - 855https://digitalcommons.owu.edu/finley-letters/1342/thumbnail.jp
The Hicks-Moorsteen Productivity Index Satisfies the Determinateness Axiom.
No full textThere are two total factor productivity indices available in the literature based on a primal notion of the technology. In a ratio tradition, these are the Malmquist and the HicksMoorsteen productivity indices. In a difference perspective, the Luenberger and Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicators are based upon a sightly different concept. The purpose of this note is to establish that -in contrast to the Malmquist index- the Hicks-Moorsteen type of productivity index (as well as its difference-based counterpart) is well-defined and satisfies the determinateness property, since the underlying distance functions are always feasible.Malmquist productivity index, Hicks-Moorsteen productivity index, determinateness
Hicks, R B, 3789896
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/392149Surname: HICKS. Given Name(s) or Initials: R B. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 3789896. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: SEA-2948.209742
Item: [2016.0049.24442] "Hicks, R B, 3789896
Cora B. Hicks
No full textPortrait of Cora B. Hicks taken at the Carlson photography studio in Aledo, Illinois
Writers Talk featuring authors Troy Hicks and Elaine Wolf
No full textElaine Wolf, author of Camp, talks to OSU students Erin Reilly-Sanders and Allison Fetzer. Author and teacher Troy Hicks talks to OSU employee Kevin Cordi about the impact of technology on the teaching of writing.The media can be accessed here: http://streaming.osu.edu/knowledgebank/WritersTalk-Audio/WT_2013-3-18-Hicks_Wolf.mp3Ohio State University. Center for the Study and Teaching of Writin
Hicks B. Waldron
No full textPortrait of Hicks B. Waldronhttps://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/speccoll-0445-hooks-gallery1/1692/thumbnail.jp
Why the binding theory doesn’t apply at LF
No full textThis article argues that the relegation of the binding theory to the C-I interface (LF) is theoretically undesirable and empirically unwarranted. Recent Minimalist research has sought to eliminate the binding theory from UG by reducing its conditions to narrow-syntactic operations (Hornstein 2000, 2006; Reuland 2001, 2006; Kayne 2002; Zwart 2002, 2006; Hicks 2006). This approach remains controversial since the canonical Minimalist binding theory (Chomsky 1993; Chomsky and Lasnik 1993) views the binding conditions as interpretive rules applying at LF, supported by evidence that Condition A interacts with other interpretive phenomena assumed to be determined at LF (Lebeaux 1998; Fox and Nissenbaum 2004). While the interaction of anaphor binding and scope relations in particular is not disputed, I show that it is attributable to factors outside the binding theory, namely the requirement that variables (including anaphors) must be c-commanded by their binders at LF. Deprived of its strongest empirical argument, the LF binding theory can then be picked apart
- …
