122 research outputs found
Avgangsutstilling bachelor i billedkunst 2016
No full textStudenter: Beatrice J. L. Alexanian, Josefin Andersson, Thore Normann Andreassen, Fredrick Arnøy, Ina Bache-Wiig, Emilie de Rohan Birkeland, Ask Brean, Julia Alfe Bylund, Stine Horgen Bø, Elina Ericsson, Henning Erlandsson, Randi Furuberg, Stian Hansen, Anton Jawdokimov, Kachun Lay, Magne Lyngvær, Øystein Skråstad, Eirik Slyngstad, Simen Stenberg, Klara Ström, David Torstensson, Istvan Virag, Hannah Wiker Wikström, Tomas Maria Postiglione Øvrelid. Visningssted: Kunsthøgskolen i Oslo, Atelier Nord ANX. Tidspunkt: 12. mai - 22. mai 2016. Åpning: 11. mai 2016. Koordinator: Eirin Støen. Foto: Istvan Virag
Avgangsutstilling bachelor i billedkunst 2016
No full textStudenter: Beatrice J. L. Alexanian, Josefin Andersson, Thore Normann Andreassen, Fredrick Arnøy, Ina Bache-Wiig, Emilie de Rohan Birkeland, Ask Brean, Julia Alfe Bylund, Stine Horgen Bø, Elina Ericsson, Henning Erlandsson, Randi Furuberg, Stian Hansen, Anton Jawdokimov, Kachun Lay, Magne Lyngvær, Øystein Skråstad, Eirik Slyngstad, Simen Stenberg, Klara Ström, David Torstensson, Istvan Virag, Hannah Wiker Wikström, Tomas Maria Postiglione Øvrelid. Visningssted: Kunsthøgskolen i Oslo, Atelier Nord ANX. Tidspunkt: 12. mai - 22. mai 2016. Åpning: 11. mai 2016. Koordinator: Eirin Støen. Foto: Istvan Virag
Avgangsutstilling bachelor i billedkunst 2016
No full textStudenter: Beatrice J. L. Alexanian, Josefin Andersson, Thore Normann Andreassen, Fredrick Arnøy, Ina Bache-Wiig, Emilie de Rohan Birkeland, Ask Brean, Julia Alfe Bylund, Stine Horgen Bø, Elina Ericsson, Henning Erlandsson, Randi Furuberg, Stian Hansen, Anton Jawdokimov, Kachun Lay, Magne Lyngvær, Øystein Skråstad, Eirik Slyngstad, Simen Stenberg, Klara Ström, David Torstensson, Istvan Virag, Hannah Wiker Wikström, Tomas Maria Postiglione Øvrelid. Visningssted: Kunsthøgskolen i Oslo, Atelier Nord ANX. Tidspunkt: 12. mai - 22. mai 2016. Åpning: 11. mai 2016. Koordinator: Eirin Støen. Foto: Istvan Virag
Revisiting the Moral Forecasting Error – A Preregistered Replication and Extension of “Are We More Moral Than We Think?”
No full textPredictions about the future are often inaccurate, but the direction of prediction errors may vary. Contrary to research on the intention-behavior gap, where people fail to live up to their future ambitions, a study on “moral forecasting” found that people behaved more honestly than they predicted. Since this interesting prediction error has only been identified in a few studies and the direction of the effect may seem surprising, psychological science could benefit from a high-powered replication. In Experiment 1, we will conduct a close replication using the original cheating task and a general population sample from the same country as the original study (Canada). By extension, we will also include the “mind-game paradigm” as an established deception-free cheating task from behavioral economics, to assess task generalizability. If the primary hypothesis is supported, then we propose a second extension in Experiment 2, by examining whether a cognitive debiasing intervention can reduce the moral forecasting error in a general population sample from the US. As a final extension we will also examine the social dimension of lay beliefs, by assessing whether moral forecasts for other people exhibit the same prediction error as moral forecasts for oneself. In the current experiments, the planned sample size will provide 90% power to detect ¼ of the observed effect size from the original study
A terrible future: Episodic future thinking and the perceived risk of terrorism
No full textTerrorism is a salient risk source in 21st century life and may deter tourists from visiting certain destinations. How people perceive the risk of a future terror attack abroad, and thus their traveling decisions, may be influenced by whether they think about the future in specific and personal terms (episodic future thinking) or in more general, abstract terms (semantic future thinking). In a pre-registered experiment (N = 277) we explored the potential impact of episodic future thinking on the perceived risk of terror attacks abroad. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: (1) An episodic future thinking-condition, where participants were asked to imagine a specific, terror-related personal episode that might occur in the future while traveling abroad; (2) a semantic future thinking-condition, where participants were asked to think more abstractly about terror events that might occur in the future; (3) an episodic counterfactual thinkingcondition, where participants were asked to imagine a specific, terror-related personal episode that might have occurred in the past while traveling abroad and (4) a passive control condition. Participants indicated their perceived risk of six different future terror attacks occurring abroad. The manipulation checks suggest that the experimental manipulations functioned as intended. Contrary to the central hypothesis of the study, there were no differences in the perceived risk of terror attacks between the conditions. These results run counter to previous research and do not support the idea that how people think about the future influences their perceived risk of future dramatic events. Potential limitations and implications are discussed
- …
