542 research outputs found
Analisis Yuridis Kedudukan Hukum Tanah Adat dalam Hak Menguasai Negara Menurut Hukum Tanah Indonesia (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2940 K/Pdt/2020)
No full textABSTRACT
Ulayat rights of adat community basically has been put in the most respected place in the law of National Land (UUPA), because it has been granted recognition and legal protection both under the 1945 Constitution and Basic Agrarian Regulation. However, in reality some conflicts and disputes frequently occurred due to ownership right and claim over ulayat land. The disputes that frequently occurred is civil disputes related to land ownership issue. Those disputes are in terms of ulayat land rights or the object of ulayat right, one of which is the dispute of ulayat land ownership and the relation between society personal rights over the land and rights to claim the land by the state is still unclear. The objectives of the research are, 1) How about the legal standing of ulayat land in terms of the state right to claim; 2) How about the ownership status of adat land, especially in Karo Regency after the provision of Basic Agrarian Regulation; 3) How about the judge legal consideration toward the plaintiff claims under the Supreme Court Ruling
Number 2940 K/PDT/2020 on the construction of Indonesia Land Law This thesis uses normative juridical analysis method and the Supreme Court Ruling Number 2940 K/PDT/2020 is analyzed by using secondary data. Data collection is conducted through library research and data from interview guide are used as supportive data. Then, data are analyzed qualitatively
Regarding Juridical analysis of adat land legal standing in terms of state right to claim, the results indicate that according to agrarian law of Indonesia (study of high court ruling Number 2940 k/pd/2020), the judge decides that Kabanjahe District Court has implemented the law and rejected all plaintiff claims as well as Medan District Court Ruling which strengthen the Kabanjahe District Court Ruling Moreover, in the level of cassation related to judex facti consideration, in this case Medan High Court which has strengthened the Kabanjahe District Court Ruling Supreme Court thinks that judex facti decision is suitable, correct and based on law because the plaintiff cannot prove his claims especially in terms of proving the ownership over the disputed land as his because he only presents the evidence based on partial confession and statement letters. If the plaintiff can prove his ownership right over the disputed land, although he has certificate without having control over the physical land, or leaving the land unattended, the physical claim over the land is protected by the state as referred to Jurisprudence of Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 295 K/Sip/1973 and Number 329 K/Sip/1957 & No. 783 K/Sip/1973, stating that in this case the plaintiff has released the right over the land
Keywords: legal standing, state right to claim, adat land138 HalamanTesis Magiste
Hydraulic simulations to evaluate and predict design and operation of the Chashma Right Bank Canal
No full textIrrigation systems / Irrigation canals / Flow control / Velocity / Canal regulation techniques / Hydraulics / Simulation models / Design / Operations / Crop-based irrigation / Distributary canals / Water delivery / Policy / Protective irrigation / Water allocation / Water requirements / Sedimentation / Water distribution / Equity / Water conveyance / Pakistan / Chashma Right Bank Canal
Implementasi Metode PCA – K Nearest Neighbour untuk Deteksi Golongan Kendaraan Berdasarkan Jumlah Pasang Gandar
No full textDetection of vehicle type based axle allow to do classify vehicle based on the load that will carried by the vehicle. However at this time, classification of heavy vehicle types based on axles is still carried out by humans. In here research, author use image processing for classification of vehicles class with PCA-K Nearest Neighbour Method. The reason for choosing this algorithm is because previous research use K-Means Clustering have a same formula with K-Nearest Neighbour. The data used is the image captured from the video camera processed by background subtraction method to separate moving object namely vehicle with its background. PCA method is required to obtain eigen vektor from vehicle and reduce its dimensions. Meanwhile, for classification author tries to use classification algorithm of K-Nearest Neighbour. To detect vehicle axles author use Circular Hough Transform method. The Testing Result shows detect vehicle type use PCA-K Nearest Neighbour method with value of K=1 has an accuracy 90%.Deteksi golongan kendaraan berdasarkan gandar memungkinkan untuk melakukan klasifikasi kendaraan berdasarkan beban yang akan di bawa oleh kendaraan tersebut. Namun pada saat ini, klasifikasi jenis kendaraan berat berdasarkan gandar masih dilakukan oleh manusia. Dalam penelitian ini, penulis menggunakan pengolahan citra untuk klasifikasi golongan kendaraan dengan metode PCA-K Nearest Neighbour. Alasan pemilihan algoritma ini adalah karena penelitian sebelumnya menggunakan algoritma K-means Clustering memiliki rumus yang sama dengan K-Nearest Neighbour. Data yang digunakan adalah citra yang ditangkap dari kamera video diproses dengan metode background subtraction untuk memisahkan objek yang bergerak yaitu kendaraan dengan backgroundnya. Metode PCA diperlukan untuk mendapatkan vektor eigen dari kendaraan dan mereduksi dimensinya, sedangkan untuk klasifikasi penulis mencoba menggunakan algoritma klasifikasi K Nearest Neighbours. Untuk deteksi gandar kendaraan penulis menggunakan metode Circular Hough Transform. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan deteksi golongan kendaraan menggunakan metode PCA-K Nearest Neighbours dengan nilai K=1 mendapat akurasi 90%.84 HalamanSkripsi Sarjan
Penyelesaian Sengketa Permohonan Penerbitan Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah di Kota Binjai (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 175/K/TUN/2012)
No full textPendaftaran tanah bertujuan menjamin kepastian hukum. Bila tanah tidak
didaftar maka jaminan kepastian tersebut diragukan sehingga mudah saja pihak lain
mengklaim tanah tersebut miliknya. Penyelesaian sengketa permohonan penerbitan
sertipikat hak atas tanah di Kota Binjai dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor
175/K/TUN/2012 berkaitan dengan masalah pendaftaran tanah terhadap hak-hak
lama hingga telah menempuh proses perjalanan sangat panjang. Bagaimana kekuatan
hukum terhadap alas hak atas tanah yang belum mempunyai sertipikat BPN dan apa
yang menjadi dasar hukum pertimbangan majelis hakim dan akibat hukum dalam
Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 175/K/TUN/2012?
Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif. Sifat penelitian ini adalah
deskriptif analitis. Sumber data adalah data sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data
dilakukan dengan studi pustaka dan studi putusan pengadilan. Analisis data
berdasarkan kualitatif dan penarikan kesimpulan dilakukan secara deduktif, semua
data diungkapkan terlebih dahulu hal-hal yang bersifat umum kemudian dikerucutkan
pengungkapan data yang bersifat khusus.
Kekuatan hukum terhadap alat bukti tertulis sebagai alas hak atas tanah yang
belum bersertipikat BPN lebih lemah dari pada alas hak atas tanah yang telah
bersertifikat BPN. Sertipikat BPN lebih tinggi kekuatan mengikatnya dari bukti-bukti
maupun dokumen-dokumen lainnya. Dasar hukum pertimbangan majelis hakim
dalam Putusan MA Nomor 175/K/TUN/2012 didasarkan pada penguasaan tanah
objek sengketa telah terus-menerus diduduki oleh pemohon yang diperoleh dari orang
tuanya melalui pewarisan. Akibat hukumnya bagi pemohon memberikan legalitas hak
milik menjadi kuat untuk kembali melanjutkan permohonan pendaftaran tanah objek
sengketa, membatalkan Surat Pemerintah Kota Binjai Nomor: Nomor 893-1701 dan
Surat BPN Kota Binjai Nomor: 314/300.12.75/III/2011. Agar alas hak atas tanah
yang lama maupun dokumen-dokumen atau surat-surat berupa SK Camat, Bupati dan
Kepala Desa, serta bukti-bukti lainnya harus segera ditingkatkan menjadi
bersertipikat BPN demi hukum untuk lebih menjamin kepastian dan perlindungan
hukum. Agar hakim pengadilan seharusnya mempertimbangkan pelanggaran terhadap
prinsip transparansi, kecepatan dan kemudahan pelayanan. Agar pemohon kembali
mengajukan permohoan pendaftaran tanahnya kepada BPN Kota Binjai. Pendaftaran
tanah satu-satunya cara untuk menguatkan status hak milik atas tanah.Land registration is aimed to ensure legal certainty. If land is not registered,
there will be no legal certainty so that other people will easily claim that it belongs to
them. The settlement of dispute in land certificate at Binjai according to the Ruling of
the Supreme Court No. 175/K/TUN/2012 is related to the problem of land
registration on old rights so that it takes a long process, to the legal force of legal
base on land which has not had BPN (National Land Agency) Certificate, and to the
legal ground for the consideration of Panel of Judges and its legal consequence of
the Ruling of the Supreme Court No. 175/K/TUN/2012.
The research used normative research and descriptive analytic method. The
data were obtained from the secondary data, gathered by conducted library research
and study on Court’s verdicts and analyzed qualitatively. The conclusion was drawn
deductively (all data were exposed from general to particular).
The legal force for written evidence as legal basis on land which has not had
BPN Certificate is weaker than that which has BPN Certificate. BPN Certificate has
stronger binding force than evidence and other documents. The consideration of the
Panel of Judges on the Ruling of the Supreme Court No. 175/K/TUN/2012 is based
on the control of land as a dispute object which is continuously occupied by the
petitioner who has gotten the land from his parents. The legal consequence of giving
legality of ownership has motivated him to continue requesting for registering
disputed land and revoking the Letter of Binjai City Administration No. 893-1701
and the letter of BPN of Binjai No. 314/300.12.75/III/2011. Legal basis on the old
land and documents or certificates such as the Directives of the Subdistrict Head, the
Regent, the Village Head, and the other evidence should be increased to become BPN
Certificate for the sake of law in order to guarantee legal certainty and legal
protection. It is also recommended that court judges consider the violation against
the principles of transparency, speed, and service facility and petitioner once again
request for his land registration to BPN of Binjai since land registration is the only
way to strengthen the status of land rights.166 HalamanTesis Magiste
Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 248/K/TUN/2008 PT. PELINDO I (Persero) Sebagai Pemegang Hak Pengelolaan
No full textHak Pengelolaan diperkenalkan untuk pertama kali oleh Peraturan Menteri
Agraria Nomor 9 Tahun1965. Hak Pengelolaan ini wajib didaftarkan pada kantor
Pendaftaran Tanah pada kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten/Kota yang bersangkutan
menurut peraturan yang berlaku.Tahun 1993 diterbitkan Sertifikat Hak Pengelolaan
Nomor 1 desa Belawan tertanggal 3 Maret 1993 atas nama PT. Pelindo I (Persero)
dengan luas ± 63.000 m2. \Diterbitkannya sertifikat Hak Pengelolaan bertentangan
Peraturan Menteri Agraria (PMA) Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional (BPN) Nomor
9 Tahun 1999. Hak Pengelolaan tersebut dikeluarkan diatas tanah Garnd Sultan, jadi
terjadi tumpang tindih. Permasalahan dari latar belakang tersebut yaituBagaimana
dasar hukum pengaturan eksekusi putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor
248/K/TUN/2008, Apa hambatan-hambatan yang timbul dalam mengeksekusi
putusan Mahakamah Agung Nomor 248/K/TUN/2008 sehingga tidak dapat
dieksekusi,Bagaimana pertimbangan hakim tentang Putusan Mahakamah Agung
Nomor 248/K/TUN/2008 hak pengelolaan yang diterbitkan tidak sesuai dengan
prosedur penerbitannya.
Spesifikasi Penelitian menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif,
Sifat Penelitian deskriptif analitis, Teknik Pengumpul Data Penelitian Kepustakaan
dan Penelitian Lapangan, Analisis Data pendekatan kualitatif yang artinya
penelitian ini berupaya untuk memaparkan sekaligus untuk melakukan
analisis terhadap permasalahan yang ada dengan cara yang sistematis untuk
memperoleh kesimpulan jawaban yang jelas dan benar.
Pelaksanaan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 246/K/TUN/2008 dapat
dilaksanakan dengan dikeluarkannnya Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional
Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2011 tentang Pengelolaan Pengkajian Dan
Penanganan Kasus Pertanahan. Pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan didalam pasal 54
Ayat 1 BPN RI wajib melaksanakan putusan pengadilan yang telah memperoleh
kekuatan hukum tetap. Hambatan Pelaksanaan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor
248/TUN/20008 adalah Pihak Penggugat tidak mengajukan permohonan kepada
Badan Pertanahan Nasional untuk membatalkan sertifikat Hak Pengelolaan sesuai
dengan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 248/K/TUN/2008, Pertimbangan Hakim
dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung No 248 K/TUN/2008 menyatakan batal atau tidak
sah Sertifikat Hak pengelolaan (HPL) Nomor : 1/Desa belawan I tanggal 3 Maret
1993 atas nama PT.PELINDO I (Persero) khusus terhadap tanah seluas ±63.000m2HPL (the Right of Management) was introduced for the first time by the
Decree of the Agrarian Minister No. 9/1965. According to the prevailing regulation,
it has to be registered in the Subdistrict/Town Land Office. In 1993, the HPL
Certificate number 1 of Belawan village on March 3, 1993 on behalf of PT. Perlindo
I (Persero) with the area of ± 63,000 m2 was issued. The issuance of this Certificate
was contrary to the regulation of the Agrarian Minister (PMA), in this instance the
Head of the National Land Board (BPN) No. 9/1999. It was issued on Sultan Grant
land so that there was an overlapping. The problems of the research were as follows:
how about legal ground of the regulation on the execution of the Supreme Court’s
Ruling No. 248/K/TUN/2008, what obstacles which aroused in executing the Supreme
Court’s Ruling No. 248/K/TUN/2008 so that the land could not be executed, and how
about judge’s legal consideration in the Supreme Court’s Ruling No.
248/K/TUN/2008 on the Right of Management which was not in accordance with the
issuance procedure.
The research used judicial normative and descriptive analytical methods. The
data were gathered by performing library research and field research and analyzed
qualitatively in order to describe and to analyze the research problems systematically
in order to get clear and correct answers.
The Supreme Court’s Ruling No. 248/K/TUN/2008 can be implemented by the
issuance of the Regulation of the Head of the National Land Board of the Republic of
Indonesia No. 3/2011 on the Management of the Study and Handling Land Cases.
The Court’s Ruling in Article 54, paragraph 1 of BPN RI states that a court’s ruling
which is final and conclusive must be implemented. The obstacles in the
implementation of the Supreme Court’s Ruling No. 248/K/TUN/2008 are as follows:
the plaintiff does not file a complaint to the National Land Board to cancel the Right
of Management Certificate according to the Supreme Court’s Ruling No.
248/K/TUN/2008 and judge’s legal consideration in the Supreme Court’s Ruling No.
248/K/TUN/2008 states that the HPL Certificate Number 1/Belawan Village on
March 3, 1993, on behalf of PT. PELINDO I (Persero), especially on the land with
the area of ± 63,000 m2 is cancelled and invalid.129 HalamanTesis Magiste
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Sengketa Tanah TNI AU, CQ Lanud Suwondo yang Dikuasai oleh Masyarakat Sarirejo (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 229.K/PDT/1991)
No full textSengketa tanah seluas 260 ha antara TNI AU Cq. Lanud Suwondo dengan
masyarakat penggarap di Kelurahan Sari Rejo Kabupaten Medan Polonia hingga saat
ini belum menemukan solusi hukum dalam penyelesaiannya TNI AU Cq. Lanud
Suwondo maupun masyarakat penggarap sama-sama menyatakan menguasai fisik
tanah seluas 260 ha tersebut, sehingga menimbulkan perselisihan bahkan konflik
antara masyarakat penggarap dan TNI AU Cq. Lanud Suwondo. Permasalahan yang
di bahas dalam penelitian ini yaitu bagaimana tautan sejarah penguasaan fisik tanah
oleh TNI AU Cq. Lanud Suwondo dan masyarakat penggarap di Kelurahan Sari Rejo
Kecamatan Medan Polonia, bagaimana kedudukan hukum pihak yang bersengketa
atas tanah di Kelurahan Sari Rejo Kecamatan Polonia dan bagaimana akibat hukum
atas Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 229k/Pdt/1991 terhadap kedua belah pihak yaitu
TNI AU cq. Lanud Suwondo dan masyarakat penggarap atas penguasaan fisik tanah
di Kelurahan Sari Rejo Kecamatan Medan Polonia.
Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum
normatif yaitu penelitian yang dilakukan terhadap peraruran perundang-undangan
yang berlaku dalam hal ini adalah UUPA No. 5 Tahun 1960, PP No. 24 Tahun 1997
tentang Pendaftaran Tanah, Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 229.K/PDT/1991.
Sifat penelitian ini adalah deskriptif analitis dimana penelitian ini berupaya untuk
menggambarkan, memaparkan dan menganalisis permasalahan yang timbul, lalu
mencari jawaban yang benar sebagai solusi dari permasalahan tersebut.
Hasil pembahasan dari permasalahan yang timbul dalam penelitian ini adalah
Tautan Sejarah Penguasaan Fisik Tanah oleh TNI adalah bahwa TNI AU Cq. Lanud
Suwondo telah menguasai fisik tanah seluas 260 ha di Kelurahan Sari Rejo
Kecamatan Medan Polonia sejak tahun 1950 dengan dasar hukum Instruksi Kepala
Staf Angkatan Perang (KSAP) nomor 023/P/KSAP/50 tanggal 25 Mei 1950. Tautan
sejarah penguasaan fisik tanah oleh masyarakat penggarap di Kelurahan Sari Rejo
Kecamatan Medan Polonia adalah bahwa masyarakat penggarap telah menguasai
fisik tanah tersebut selama 20 tahun lebih dan telah ada alas hak dari msyarakat
penggarap berupa surat keterangan tanah dari Kepala Desa / Lurah maupun camat.
Kedudukan hukum pihak yang bersengketa atas tanah di Kelurahan Sari Rejo
Kecamatan Polonia adalah bahwa pihak TNI AU cq. Lanud Suwondo adalah pihak
yang menguasai fisik tanah dan menggunakan lahan pertanahan seluas 260 ha
berdasarkan alas hak surat keputusan KSAP No. 023/P/KSAP/50 tanggal 25 Mei
1950, sedangkan pihak komunitas masyarakat di Kelurahan Sari Rejo Kecamatan
Medan Polonia yang menguasai fisik tanah berstatus sebagai komunitas masyarakat
penggarap atas tanah yang dikuasai secara fisik oleh pihak TNI AU Cq Lanud
Suwondo. Akibat hukum atas Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 229k/Pdt/1991
terhadap kedua belah pihak yaitu TNI AU cq. Lanud Suwondo dan masyarakat
penggarap atas penguasaan fisik tanah di Kelurahan Sari Rejo Kecamatan Medan
Polonia adalah bahwa pihak TNI AU Cq Lanud Suwondo wajib mematuhi putusan
MA No. 229k/Pdt/1991 yang telah memenangkan 87 orang penggugat dari komunitas
masyarakat penggarap, dengan menyerahkan lahan pertanahan seluas 5,6 ha kepada
87 orang masyarakat penggarap tersebut.Dispute in land at the area of 260 ha between TNI AU, in this instance,
Lanud Suwondo and tillers at Kelurahan Sari Rejo, Medan Polonia Subdistrict,
has not yet settled. Each party claims that they control the land so that they are in
conflict. The research problems are how about the historical link of land
controlling by TNI AU, in this instance, Lanud Suwondo and tillers at Kelurahan
Sari Rejo, how about the legal position of the conflicting parties on the land at
Kelurahan Sari Rejo, and how about the legal consequences of the Supreme
Court’s Ruling No. 229.K/Pdt/1991 on both the conflicting parties about physical
controlling on the land Kelurahan Sari Rejo, Medan Polonia Subdistrict.
The research used juridical normative method by analyzing legal
provisions such as UUPA No. 5/1960, PP No. 24/1997 on Land registration, and
the Supreme Court’s Ruling No. 229.K/PDT/1991. The nature of the research was
descriptive analytic by describing and analyzing the research problems and
finding the correct answers as their solution.
The result of the research shows that in the historical link of land
controlling by TNI AU, TNI AU, in this instance, Lanud Suwondo has controlled
the land at the area of 260 ha at Kelurahan Sari Rejo, Medan Polonia Subdistrict
since 1950, based on the Instruction of KSAP (Warefare Chief of Staff) No.
023/KSAP/50 on May 25, 1950. The historical link of land controlling by the
tillers was that they have controlled the land physically for more than 20 years
and have legal standing by obtaining land certificates from Village Head and
Subdistrict Head. The legal position of the conflicting parties on the land is that
TNI AU, in this instance, Lanud Suwondo has controlled the land physically with
the legal standing, based on the Instruction of KSAP No. 023/KSAP/50 on May
25, 1950, while the community at Kelurahan Sari Rejo with the status as tillers on
the land which has been controlled physically by TNI AU, in this instance, Lanud
Suwondo. The legal consequence of the Supreme Court’s Ruling No.
229.K/Pdt/1991on both the conflicting parties is that TNI AU, in this instance,
Lanud Suwondo is required to comply with the Supreme Court’s Ruling No.
229.K/Pdt/1991 which has accepted the claim of 87 plaintiffs for the tillers by
handing in the land at the area of 5.6 hectares to the 87 tillers.204 HalamanTesis Magiste
Juridical Analysis of Land Title Transfer in Land Sale and Purchase Agreement Due to Will Defect (Wilsgebrek) (Analysis of Ruling Number 130/K/PDT/2017)
No full textIn practice, the events indicating will defect such as oversight, fraud, and coercion are frequently found. However, the will statement to approve the agreement cannot be said flawless either, especially if it occurs in the case of sale and purchase agreement in which one of the parties suffers great financial loss. However, due to certain circumstances, a party is forced to end the agreement. This type of condition tends to easily occur if one of the parties is more prominent than the others. The problem of this research is regarding the legal transfer of land title in sale and purchase agreement, the determination of will defect in land title transfer after the implementation of the sale and purchase agreement, and the juridical analysis of land title transfer in the sale and purchase agreement due to will defect (wilsgebrek) based on Ruling Number 130/K/PDT/2017.
This research employs normative juridical method, uses primary and secondary data sources, and qualitative data analysis.
The result indicates that the legal consequences of land title transfer are the loss of the right to an object and the right is transferred to other person because of some reason. The determination of will defect in land title transfer after the implementation of sale and purchase agreement can be seen from the phase of pre-contract conducted, as this period occurs before both parties reach an agreement regarding the transaction plan they will make. Juridical analysis of land title transfer in land sale and purchase agreement due to will defect (wilsgrebrek) based on Ruling Number 130/K/PDT/2017 indicates that according to judge consideration, since the subjective terms are not fulfilled in the sale and purchase agreement where parties bond themselves in accordance with Article 1320 of the Civil Code, the land title between I Rantuh and Maria Nengah Suarti under Notarial Deed Number 36, dated 9th November 1984 is legally defect, which means the Notarial Deed is null and void, and can be annulled. The legal consequence for the cancellation of the Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) is the termination of the agreement and both parties can break away from what is stipulated in Articles 1266 and 1267 of the Civil Code. The party who sells is obligated to return the money paid by the buyer after being deducted by some percent from the land and building selling price. The money is returned no later than at the certain time that has been agreed.153 PagesTesis Magiste
Juridical Analysis of Land Title Transfer in Land Sale and Purchase Agreement Due to Will Defect (Wilsgebrek) (Analysis of Ruling Number 130/K/PDT/2017)
No full textIn practice, the events indicating will defect such as oversight, fraud, and coercion are frequently found. However, the will statement to approve the agreement cannot be said flawless either, especially if it occurs in the case of sale and purchase agreement in which one of the parties suffers great financial loss. However, due to certain circumstances, a party is forced to end the agreement. This type of condition tends to easily occur if one of the parties is more prominent than the others. The problem of this research is regarding the legal transfer of land title in sale and purchase agreement, the determination of will defect in land title transfer after the implementation of the sale and purchase agreement, and the juridical analysis of land title transfer in the sale and purchase agreement due to will defect (wilsgebrek) based on Ruling Number 130/K/PDT/2017.
This research employs normative juridical method, uses primary and secondary data sources, and qualitative data analysis.
The result indicates that the legal consequences of land title transfer are the loss of the right to an object and the right is transferred to other person because of some reason. The determination of will defect in land title transfer after the implementation of sale and purchase agreement can be seen from the phase of pre-contract conducted, as this period occurs before both parties reach an agreement regarding the transaction plan they will make. Juridical analysis of land title transfer in land sale and purchase agreement due to will defect (wilsgrebrek) based on Ruling Number 130/K/PDT/2017 indicates that according to judge consideration, since the subjective terms are not fulfilled in the sale and purchase agreement where parties bond themselves in accordance with Article 1320 of the Civil Code, the land title between I Rantuh and Maria Nengah Suarti under Notarial Deed Number 36, dated 9th November 1984 is legally defect, which means the Notarial Deed is null and void, and can be annulled. The legal consequence for the cancellation of the Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) is the termination of the agreement and both parties can break away from what is stipulated in Articles 1266 and 1267 of the Civil Code. The party who sells is obligated to return the money paid by the buyer after being deducted by some percent from the land and building selling price. The money is returned no later than at the certain time that has been agreed.153 PagesTesis Magiste
Pembatalan Hibah Karena Melanggar Legitime Portie Ahli Waris Legitmaris (Studi pada Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 841 K/PDT/2003)
No full textHukum waris perdata pada asasnya bersifat mengatur, namun terdapat juga
unsur paksaan dalam menjalaninya seperti tentang terlanggarnya bagian mutlak
(legitime portie) dari ahli warislegitimaris. Terlanggarnya bagian mutlak (legitime
portie) dapat terjadi karena hibah maupun wasiat. Hibah yang telah diberikan kepada
orang lain terdapat juga hak-hak yang dimiliki oleh ahli waris legitimaris terlanggar.
Salah satu kasus mengenai pembatalan hibah karena terlanggarnya bagian mutlak
(legitime portie) ahli waris legitimaris adalah seperti dalam putusan Mahkamah
Agung Nomor.841 K/Pdt/2003. Ketika itu almarhum Asan semasa hidupnya pernah
menghibahkan dalam bentuk Akta Pembagian Saham dengan Inbreng sebanyak 49
(empat puluh sembilan) lembar saham kepada ahli waris non legitimaris.
Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan
menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Sifat penelitian ini deskriptif analitis.
Ssumber bahan hukum yang digunakan ialah data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan
hukum primer, sekunder dan tertier. Data dianalisis dengan metode kualitatif.
Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan dapat disimpulkan bahwa akibat
hukum bagi ahli waris legitimaris ketika hibah yang diberikan oleh pewaris kepada
pihak ketiga melanggar bagian mutlak (legitime portie) adalah terdapat 2 (dua) jenis
tindakan yakni tidak mengajukan keberatan atau menuntut haknya. Pelaksanaan
pembatalan hibah berkenaan dengan adanya legitime portie (bagian mutlak) yang
dilanggar dengan cara para ahli waris legitimaris dengan mengajukan tuntutan ke
pengadilan negeri agar terpenuhi legitime portie mereka melalui
inkorting/pengurangan dari hibah, dengan cara perbandingan diantara ahli waris yang
diberikan melalui hibahnya. Pertimbangan hukum terhadap putusan Mahkamah
Agung Nomor: 841K/Pdt/2003 sudah memenuhi keadilan bagi ahli waris legitimaris
yakni Siti Fatimah dan Erna Mawar karena telah mengakui keberadaan dan hak dari
ahli waris legitimaris yakni dengan cara inkorting (pengurangan) terhadap hibah yang
telah diberikan oleh pewaris. Adapun saran yang dapat ditarik dalam penelitian ini
adalah sebaiknya notaris dapat berperan dalam memberikan pemahaman hukum
kepada klien yang membuat akta hibah agar dapat kiranya menjelaskan kedudukan
bagian mutlak (legitime portie) dan kedudukan ahli waris legitimaris. Pelaksanaan
pembatalan hibah berkenaan dengan adanya legitime portie (bagian mutlak) yang
dilanggar dengan cara melakukan inkorting terhadap bagian hibah haruslah diterima
dan dilaksanakan oleh penerima hibah. Walaupun misalnya objek hibah telah
dialihkan/ dijual oleh penerima hibah kepada pihak ketiga, hibah yang melebihi
legitime portie dapat diajukan gugatan pengurangan oleh ahli waris legitiemaris
kepada pihak ketiga. Dalam memutus sengketa pewarisan yang melanggar bagian
mutlak (legitime portie) dari ahli waris legitimaris, sebaiknya hakim selalu konsisten
menerapkan penggunaan pemotongan (inkorting).Civil Inheritance Law is principally regulative; however, there is also
coercion in its practice, for example, the violation of legitime portie (absolute
portion) of the legitimaris (absolute beneficiary/s). The violation of absolute portion
may occur due to a grant or a will. The grant which has been given to other person
also contains the absolute beneficiary’s rights which have been violated. One of the
cases about a grant revocation due to violation of the absolute beneficiary’s absolute
portion is the case in the ruling of the Supreme Court No. 841 K/Pdt/2003. The
deceased Mr. Asan during his lifetime has ever granted 49 shares to a non-absolute
beneficiary.
The research applied the normative juridical method with statue approach.
This is a descriptive analytical research. The legal materials are sourced from
secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The
data are analyzed by employing the qualitative method.
Based on the research findings and discussions, it can be concluded that there
are two kinds of action that can be taken as the legal consequence of the absolute
beneficiary when the grant given by the bequeather to the third party violates the
absolute portion; namely, by not filing a document of complaint or by demanding his
rights. The grant revocation due to violation of absolute portion is implemented by
the document of complaint submitted by the absolute beneficiary to the district court
so that their absolute portion can be fulfilled by means of inkorting (reorganizing)/
reducing the portion of the grant, by using the ratio between the beneficiary and the
parti given for the grant. The judge’s consideration in the ruling of the Supreme
Court No. 841 K/Pdt/2003 has provided justice to the absolute beneficiaries i.e. Siti
Fatimah and Erna Mawar for acknowledging their existence and giving their rights
through inkorting (reduction) of the grant given by the bequeather. It is suggested
that the notary provide legal understanding to his client who needs to grant deeds so
that they understand the position of absolute portion and absolute beneficiary. The
grant revocation related to the violation of absolute portion is done by inkorting
(reduction) of the portion of the grant which has to be accepted and implemented by
the grant receivers. Although the object of the grant has been transferred/ sold by the
grant receiver to a third party, the grant exceeding the absolute portion can be
claimed to be reduced by the absolute beneficiary to the third party. It is suggested
that the judge be always consistent to implement inkorting in settling the dispute over
violation of the absolute beneficiary’s absolute portion.150 HalamanTesis Magiste
Pembatalan Hibah Karena Melanggar Legitime Portie Ahli Waris Legitmaris (Studi pada Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 841 K/PDT/2003)
No full textHukum waris perdata pada asasnya bersifat mengatur, namun terdapat juga
unsur paksaan dalam menjalaninya seperti tentang terlanggarnya bagian mutlak
(legitime portie) dari ahli warislegitimaris. Terlanggarnya bagian mutlak (legitime
portie) dapat terjadi karena hibah maupun wasiat. Hibah yang telah diberikan kepada
orang lain terdapat juga hak-hak yang dimiliki oleh ahli waris legitimaris terlanggar.
Salah satu kasus mengenai pembatalan hibah karena terlanggarnya bagian mutlak
(legitime portie) ahli waris legitimaris adalah seperti dalam putusan Mahkamah
Agung Nomor.841 K/Pdt/2003. Ketika itu almarhum Asan semasa hidupnya pernah
menghibahkan dalam bentuk Akta Pembagian Saham dengan Inbreng sebanyak 49
(empat puluh sembilan) lembar saham kepada ahli waris non legitimaris.
Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan
menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Sifat penelitian ini deskriptif analitis.
Ssumber bahan hukum yang digunakan ialah data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan
hukum primer, sekunder dan tertier. Data dianalisis dengan metode kualitatif.
Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan dapat disimpulkan bahwa akibat
hukum bagi ahli waris legitimaris ketika hibah yang diberikan oleh pewaris kepada
pihak ketiga melanggar bagian mutlak (legitime portie) adalah terdapat 2 (dua) jenis
tindakan yakni tidak mengajukan keberatan atau menuntut haknya. Pelaksanaan
pembatalan hibah berkenaan dengan adanya legitime portie (bagian mutlak) yang
dilanggar dengan cara para ahli waris legitimaris dengan mengajukan tuntutan ke
pengadilan negeri agar terpenuhi legitime portie mereka melalui
inkorting/pengurangan dari hibah, dengan cara perbandingan diantara ahli waris yang
diberikan melalui hibahnya. Pertimbangan hukum terhadap putusan Mahkamah
Agung Nomor: 841K/Pdt/2003 sudah memenuhi keadilan bagi ahli waris legitimaris
yakni Siti Fatimah dan Erna Mawar karena telah mengakui keberadaan dan hak dari
ahli waris legitimaris yakni dengan cara inkorting (pengurangan) terhadap hibah yang
telah diberikan oleh pewaris. Adapun saran yang dapat ditarik dalam penelitian ini
adalah sebaiknya notaris dapat berperan dalam memberikan pemahaman hukum
kepada klien yang membuat akta hibah agar dapat kiranya menjelaskan kedudukan
bagian mutlak (legitime portie) dan kedudukan ahli waris legitimaris. Pelaksanaan
pembatalan hibah berkenaan dengan adanya legitime portie (bagian mutlak) yang
dilanggar dengan cara melakukan inkorting terhadap bagian hibah haruslah diterima
dan dilaksanakan oleh penerima hibah. Walaupun misalnya objek hibah telah
dialihkan/ dijual oleh penerima hibah kepada pihak ketiga, hibah yang melebihi
legitime portie dapat diajukan gugatan pengurangan oleh ahli waris legitiemaris
kepada pihak ketiga. Dalam memutus sengketa pewarisan yang melanggar bagian
mutlak (legitime portie) dari ahli waris legitimaris, sebaiknya hakim selalu konsisten
menerapkan penggunaan pemotongan (inkorting).Civil Inheritance Law is principally regulative; however, there is also
coercion in its practice, for example, the violation of legitime portie (absolute
portion) of the legitimaris (absolute beneficiary/s). The violation of absolute portion
may occur due to a grant or a will. The grant which has been given to other person
also contains the absolute beneficiary’s rights which have been violated. One of the
cases about a grant revocation due to violation of the absolute beneficiary’s absolute
portion is the case in the ruling of the Supreme Court No. 841 K/Pdt/2003. The
deceased Mr. Asan during his lifetime has ever granted 49 shares to a non-absolute
beneficiary.
The research applied the normative juridical method with statue approach.
This is a descriptive analytical research. The legal materials are sourced from
secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The
data are analyzed by employing the qualitative method.
Based on the research findings and discussions, it can be concluded that there
are two kinds of action that can be taken as the legal consequence of the absolute
beneficiary when the grant given by the bequeather to the third party violates the
absolute portion; namely, by not filing a document of complaint or by demanding his
rights. The grant revocation due to violation of absolute portion is implemented by
the document of complaint submitted by the absolute beneficiary to the district court
so that their absolute portion can be fulfilled by means of inkorting (reorganizing)/
reducing the portion of the grant, by using the ratio between the beneficiary and the
parti given for the grant. The judge’s consideration in the ruling of the Supreme
Court No. 841 K/Pdt/2003 has provided justice to the absolute beneficiaries i.e. Siti
Fatimah and Erna Mawar for acknowledging their existence and giving their rights
through inkorting (reduction) of the grant given by the bequeather. It is suggested
that the notary provide legal understanding to his client who needs to grant deeds so
that they understand the position of absolute portion and absolute beneficiary. The
grant revocation related to the violation of absolute portion is done by inkorting
(reduction) of the portion of the grant which has to be accepted and implemented by
the grant receivers. Although the object of the grant has been transferred/ sold by the
grant receiver to a third party, the grant exceeding the absolute portion can be
claimed to be reduced by the absolute beneficiary to the third party. It is suggested
that the judge be always consistent to implement inkorting in settling the dispute over
violation of the absolute beneficiary’s absolute portion.150 HalamanTesis Magiste
- …
