1,720,959 research outputs found

    Stock performance based on sharia stock screening: Comparasion between syariah stock indices of Indonesia and Malaysia

    No full text
    This study aims to compare the performance of the Islamic stock index in Malaysia and Indonesia using the Sharpe, Treynor and Jensen methods. The findings in this study are the performance of Sharia JII and FBMS stocks in 2014-2019, it can be concluded that the overall Sharpe and Treynor method shows a negative performance value, which means that the performance is not good, whereas when measured using the Jensen Indonesia method it shows a positive performance value. Which means that the performance is good so that Indonesia has a better performance than Malaysia, measured by the Jensen method. Based on the results of different tests, it shows that there are differences in the performance of the two countries in 2014-2019 from each index (Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen).

    Comparison of Stock Performance Based on Ethical Investment: Evidance on JII and SRI-KEHATI Indices

    Get PDF
    This research aims to analyze and compare the performance of the Islamic stock portfolio represented by the JII index and ethical investment represented by the SRI-KE-HATI index by measuring the Risk Adjustment Return Index through the Sharpe index, Treynor index, and Jensen Index  differential return and appraisal ratio. The data analysis of this research consists of five parts, namely descriptive analysis, analysis of stock performance, with three methods, namely Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen.differential return and appraisal ratio and Multiple Comparison Test. Based on the comparison of the performance of JII and SRI-KEHATI stocks in 2014-2019, it can be concluded that the overall method of Sharpe, Treynor and differential return shows a negative performance value, which means that the performance is not good, whereas when measured using the Jensen method and Appraisal Return shows positive performance value, which means good performance. When compared between the performance of JII and SRI-KEHATI shares, there is a difference between the performance of the JII and SRI-KEHATI Indices during the study perio

    Perbandingan Pembentukan Portofolio Optimal Model Indeks Tunggal Menggunakan Return Aset Bebas Risiko Sukuk dan Sertifikat Bank Indonesia Syariah (SBIS)

    No full text
    Portofolio optimal merupakan portofolio dengan kombinasi antara keuntungan yang diharapkan dan risiko terbaik sesuai dengan preferensi investor. Terdapat beberapa model yang digunakan dalam pembentukan portofolio optimal, salah satunya adalah model Indeks Tunggal. Model indeks tunggal didasarkan pada pengamatan bahwa harga dari suatu sekuritas berfluktuasi searah dengan harga pasar. Model indeks tunggal menghitung optimasi perbandingan antara keuntungan yang diharapkan dan risiko portofolio, yang dilambangkan dengan θ . Variabel input yang digunakan untuk membentuk portofolio optimal dengan Model Indeks Tunggal adalah return saham, return pasar dan return aset bebas risiko. Pada penelitian ini akan dibandingkan return aset bebas risiko (risk free rate) menggunakan data dari sukuk dan Sertifikat Bank Indonesia Syariah (SBIS). Hasil portofolio optimal dengan return aset bebas risiko menggunakan data sukuk memberikan keuntungan sebesar 0.0188 setiap minggu dan risiko sebesar 0.0729 setiap minggu. Sedangkanhasil portofolio optimal dengan return aset bebas risiko menggunakan data dari Sertifikat Bank Indonesia Syariah (SBIS) mengahsilkan keuntungan sebesar 0.018561 setiap minggu dan risiko sebesar 0.072293 setiap minggu. Dengan menggunakan ukuran kinerja portofolio optimal indeks sharpe maka portofolio optimal yang terbaik menggunakan return aset bebas risiko Sertifikat Bank Indonesia Syariah (SBIS)

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore