323,289 research outputs found
Ayton, A C, TX5576
This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/369480Surname: AYTON
Given Name(s) or Initials: A C
Military Service Number or Last Known Location: TX5576
Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 30691179522
Item: [2016.0049.01807] "Ayton, A C, TX5576
Accelerated superposition state molecular dynamics for condensed phase systems
An extension of superposition state molecular dynamics (SSMD) [Venkatnathan and Voth J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2005, 1, 36] is presented with the goal to accelerate timescales and enable the study of "long-time" phenomena for condensed phase systems. It does not require any a priori knowledge about final and transition state configurations, or specific topologies. The system is induced to explore new configurations by virtue of a fictitious (free-particle-like) accelerating potential. The acceleration method can be applied to all degrees of freedom in the system and can be applied to condensed phases and fluids
Diffusive author(s), cohesive author: Analysis of S/N (1994)
This study indicates the ways in which various aspects of the author(s) are brought forth in Dumb type’s performance art, the S/N production. Previous research has suggested a non-hierarchical organization of Dumb type and the absence of a “privileged author” in Dumb type’s collaborative work, S/N. However, the results that I have investigated from member’s interviews on the creative process of S/N along with my analysis of the recorded images of S/N, indicate a different aspect of the author(s). First, S/N was created through, so to speak, the collective ideas of the members of Dumb type. Further, S/N has at least nine quotations from previous performances, installations, and printed writings, besides the work-in-progress technique. Explicating one of the “author functions” as given by Michel Foucault, each text has plural subjects of the author. However, it has been revealed from members’ interviews that Teiji Furuhashi had a decision-making role in selecting the members’ ideas within the performance. Since then, S/N has had plural subjects of creation; however, Furuhashi is one of the subjects of creation along with the “privileged author.” S/N has plural authors (diffusive authors) yet at the same time, it has a “privileged author,” Teiji Furuhashi (cohesive author)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Serotonergic markers in Parkinson's disease and levodopa‐induced dyskinesias
Abstract not availablePerdita Cheshire, Scott Ayton, Kelly L. Bertram, Helen Ling, Abi Li, Catriona McLean, Glenda M. Halliday, Sean S. O’Sullivan, Tamas Revesz, David I. Finkelstein, Elsdon Storey and David R. William
Life in lockdown
GOALS
This project has two main goals:
1. Compare the experiences of Covid-19 lockdown with those of imprisonment, in two countries (i.e., the UK and USA) separately.
2. Examine the relative and interactive power of 'indigenous' and 'importation' approaches (as found in the imprisonment literature) to predicting experiences of Covid-19 lockdown.
METHOD
We have used the same survey items as used by Dhami, Ayton, & Loewenstein's (2007) study of US prisoners' adaption to imprisonment (see also Souza and Dhami's [2010] study of UK first-time and recurrent inmates' experiences). The survey items were adapted slightly in order replace terms such as "prison" with "lockdown", and to remove items irrelevant to the Covid-19 lockdown (e.g., items asking about prison guards, criminal history etc) as well as to include items relevant to the Coronavirus pandemic (e.g., items asking about symptoms). The survey is structured (quantitative), but contains two items that will be sources of qualitative data as used by Souza and Dhami (2010).
We will use the prison data from the medium and low security US prisoners reported in Dhami et al. (2007) and from all UK (medium security) prisoners reported in Souza and Dhami (2010). The Covid-19 lockdown data collection began in the US and UK the w/c April 20th 2020 and was done via Prolific.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The project received ethical approval from City University, London. The project was partly funded by City University, London (Ayton) and Middlesex University, London (Dhami).
REFERENCES
Dhami, M. K., Ayton, P., & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Adaptation to imprisonment: Indigenous or imported? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1085-1100.
Souza, K. S., & Dhami, M. K. (2010). First-time and recurrent inmates’ experiences of imprisonment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1330-1342
Life in lockdown
GOALS
This project has two main goals:
1. Compare the experiences of Covid-19 lockdown with those of imprisonment, in two countries (i.e., the UK and USA) separately.
2. Examine the relative and interactive power of 'indigenous' and 'importation' approaches (as found in the imprisonment literature) to predicting experiences of Covid-19 lockdown.
METHOD
We have used the same survey items as used by Dhami, Ayton, & Loewenstein's (2007) study of US prisoners' adaption to imprisonment (see also Souza and Dhami's [2010] study of UK first-time and recurrent inmates' experiences). The survey items were adapted slightly in order replace terms such as "prison" with "lockdown", and to remove items irrelevant to the Covid-19 lockdown (e.g., items asking about prison guards, criminal history etc) as well as to include items relevant to the Coronavirus pandemic (e.g., items asking about symptoms). The survey is structured (quantitative), but contains two items that will be sources of qualitative data as used by Souza and Dhami (2010).
We will use the prison data from the medium and low security US prisoners reported in Dhami et al. (2007) and from all UK (medium security) prisoners reported in Souza and Dhami (2010). The Covid-19 lockdown data collection began in the US and UK the w/c April 20th 2020 and was done via Prolific.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The project received ethical approval from City University, London. The project was partly funded by City University, London (Ayton) and Middlesex University, London (Dhami).
REFERENCES
Dhami, M. K., Ayton, P., & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Adaptation to imprisonment: Indigenous or imported? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1085-1100.
Souza, K. S., & Dhami, M. K. (2010). First-time and recurrent inmates’ experiences of imprisonment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1330-1342
Scattering of a plane wave by a set of apertures animation from Applying an iterative method numerically to solve n × n matrix Wiener–Hopf equations with exponential factors. 16 September 2019
Animation corresponding to figure 4 in “Applying an iterative method to n × n matrix Wiener-Hopf problems with exponential factors”, Matthew J. Priddin, Anastasia V. Kisil and Lorna J. Ayton, Philosophical Transactions A, DOI:10.1098/rsta.2019-0241, following figure 2 in D. P. Hewett, S. Langdon, S. N. Chandler-Wilde, “A frequency-independent boundary element method for scattering by two-dimensional screens and apertures” IMA J. Numer. Anal., 35 (4), 1698-1728, 201
Life in lockdown
GOALS
This project has two main goals:
1. Compare the experiences of Covid-19 lockdown with those of imprisonment, in two countries (i.e., the UK and USA) separately.
2. Examine the relative and interactive power of 'indigenous' and 'importation' approaches (as found in the imprisonment literature) to predicting experiences of Covid-19 lockdown.
METHOD
We have used the same survey items as used by Dhami, Ayton, & Loewenstein's (2007) study of US prisoners' adaption to imprisonment (see also Souza and Dhami's [2010] study of UK first-time and recurrent inmates' experiences). The survey items were adapted slightly in order replace terms such as "prison" with "lockdown", and to remove items irrelevant to the Covid-19 lockdown (e.g., items asking about prison guards, criminal history etc) as well as to include items relevant to the Coronavirus pandemic (e.g., items asking about symptoms). The survey is structured (quantitative), but contains two items that will be sources of qualitative data as used by Souza and Dhami (2010).
We will use the prison data from the medium and low security US prisoners reported in Dhami et al. (2007) and from all UK (medium security) prisoners reported in Souza and Dhami (2010). The Covid-19 lockdown data collection began in the US and UK the w/c April 20th 2020 and was done via Prolific.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The project received ethical approval from City University, London. The project was partly funded by City University, London (Ayton) and Middlesex University, London (Dhami).
REFERENCES
Dhami, M. K., Ayton, P., & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Adaptation to imprisonment: Indigenous or imported? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1085-1100.
Souza, K. S., & Dhami, M. K. (2010). First-time and recurrent inmates’ experiences of imprisonment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1330-1342
- …
