1,720,968 research outputs found
Tinjauan Yuridis Efektifitas Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016, Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008, Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian di Indonesia. (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1105/Pidana.Sus.2017/PN.JKT.Utr Pasal 28 UUD 1945 Tentang Kebebasan Berpendapat, Pasal 28 (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Jo Pasal 45A (2) Jo Pasal 64 (1) KUHP)
Full text linkDi Indonesia, istilah ujaran kebencian belum terlalu dipahami, banyak pihak yang kerap kesulitan membedakan apakah suatu ucapan atau ekspresi termasuk ke dalam kategori ujaran kebencian, lantas apa itu sebenarnya ujaran kebencian? Secara umum, ujaran kebencian dapat diartikan sebagai ucapan yang bertujuan untuk menyinggung, menghina, mengintimidasi, atau mengancam seseorang atau suatu kelompok tertentu berdasarkan agama, etnis, ras, gender, kedisabilitasan, atau orientasi seksual. Ujaran kebencian yang saat ini marak terjadi mempunyai potensi untuk menciderai penghormatan terhadap kemajemukan dan keberagaman yang menjadi nilai pokok masyarakat Indonesia. Seperti yang diidentifikasikan oleh Komnas HAM, ujaran kebencian membuka peluang bagi berkembangnya praktik diskriminasi dan kekerasan terhadap kelompok agama, ras, dan etnis minoritas, bahkan jika dibiarkan tanpa kendali bisa mendorong tindak kekerasan terhadap kelompok minoritas. Pada Pasal 28 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 11 tahun 2008 dinyatakan bahwa “Setiap orang dengan sengaja dan tanpa hak menyebarkan informasi yang ditujukan untuk menimbulkan rasa kebencian atau permusuhan individu dan/atau kelompok masyarakat tertentu berdasarkan atas suku, agama, ras dan antar golongan (SARA). Rumusan permasalahan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut : a. Bagaimanakah Efektivitas Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik ? b.Bagaimanakah Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian di Indonesia ? Data yang diperoleh dengan cara studi pustaka atau dari literatur-literatur. yang. Meliputi : Bahan Hukum Primer yaitu : Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Undangundang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, Undang-undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008, Undang-undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2008 tentang Penghapusan Diskriminasi Ras dan Etnis, Surat Edaran Kapolri Nomor: SE/06/X/2015 Tentang Penanganan Ujaran kebencian (hate speech); dan Peraturan perundang-undangan lainnya. Bahan hukum sekunder, yaitu dengan mempergunakan dan mengumpulkan buku-buku atau kitab-kitab bacaan baik dari perpustakaan maupun dari toko-toko buku yang ada hubungannya atau relevansinya dengan pembahasan Tesis ini, serta mempergunakan sumber-sumber lain yang berkaitan dengan penelitian ini, misalnya dengan melalui penelitian lapangan yang dilakukan secara langsung terhadap objek yang menjadi sampel penelitian.
Kata Kunci: Ujaran Kebencian, Masyarakat, Huku
Assessment tools PKM Model Involving Scaffolding Metacognitive Based on Revised Bloom's Taxonomy
Full text linkThis research aims to develop software process assessment and the results of applying the model statistics PKM-BC material. The study was designed with the development of the Model Plomp. The test device of assessment will be conducted at SMAN 11 and SMAN 3 Makassar.Untuk achieve the objectives of this study used a method of development of Plomp (1997), which consists of five phases. Based on research, the resulting asesen valid, practical, and effective. The resulting assessment device includes four dimensions of knowledge, that is faktual, konseptuap, procedural, and metacognitive
Die Neumayer Station - Die deutsche Überwinterungsstation in der Antarktis (film, 19 min.)
No full textGoing Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
