1,721,370 research outputs found
TRACK: Transferring Academic Knowledge
No full textOver the past thirty years, Knowledge Transfer Activities (KTA) have come to be considered as a natural stage in the evolution of the modern university, in addition to the more traditional mandates of education and research. KTA by academics are accomplished in different forms. Some of them, more discovery-driven, are characterized by the enforcement of intellectual property right, such as patenting, licensing and creation of new business based on patent. Some others, such as consulting and collaboration with industry, are more construction driven and are undertaken outside the Intellectual Property system (IP-system). The vast majority of studies on KTA examine entrepreneurial activities generated as a result of a formal disclosure process that occurs within the IP-system. Thus, very little is still known on the breadth and depth of KTA, on the impact that these activities have on academics' research productivity, as well as on the effectiveness of university support mechanisms in fostering them. In order to fill part of this void, aim of TRACK is to: a) gather new primary and secondary data on KTA undertaken by a representative sample of the academics in the U.K.; b) complement this information with empirical evidences on their research productivity and highlight the trade-offs (if any) between KTA and research; c) identify the support mechanisms put in place by universities as well as the TTOs’ business models, spotting the best practices in the support of KTA. Adopting a multilevel approach and relying on advanced econometric technique, TRACK will characterize the depth and breadth of KTA undertaken by academics in U.K, assessing the impact that KTA have on individuals’ research productivity and exploring the impact that different institutional characteristics have on KTA undertaken by academics. Results will have implications for efforts to develop and test theories of academic entrepreneurship, as well as efforts to develop science-policies
Hybrid academic entrepreneurship and scientific productivity: evidence from Imperial College London
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
