1,618 research outputs found
[Noctes Atticae]
[Aulus Gellius] ; [ed: Johannes Andreas de Bossis]Keine Titelseite; Bl. 1a Textbeginn: Quali proportione quibusque collectionibus Plutarchus ratiocinatum esse Pythagoram ...Impressum nach Kolophon, Datum dort lateinischBesitzervermerk der Kartause auf Vorblatt samt Provenienzvermerk Johannes de Lapide, Besitzervermerk wiederholt auf Blatt 2a und am Schlus
Noctes Atticae
Holzschnitt-TiteleinfassungDruckermarke am Ende von Teil ITeil 2 mit sep. Titel: Annotationes Petri Mosellani Protogensis in ... Auli Gelii Noctes AtticasBogensignaturen: a-c⁸,d⁴,A-V⁸,Aa-Ii⁸; A-M⁸ (M₈ weiss
Paradoxes in Aulus Gellius
International audienceThe noctes Atticae of Aulus Gellius contain almost all the ancient paradoxes. Nevertheless, in comparison with his philosophical sources, the author shows a shift in the perspective of his approach. He analyses the 'master argument' of Diodorus Chronus only from an ethical point of view and, among the seven paradoxes attributed to Eubulides of Milet, he quotes the 'heap' as an absurdity (absurdum), the 'horned one' and the 'not-someone' as a trap (captio), the 'liar' as a sophism (sophisma). Following the advice of Cynics, Gellius mistrusts deceptive manoeuvres, which highlight gaps in binary logic. At the same time, however, he is interested in argumentative structures, which lead one of two opponents on to victory. The extensive report of the quarrel between Protagoras and Evathlus, and many observations of Gellius on convertible forms of reasoning in literary texts fall within this rhetorical field
Noctium Atticarum libri XIX
Mit Druckermarke von Cratander u. Hornken (H)Impressum an anderer Stelle: "APVD ANDREAM CARTANDRVM. MENSE SEPTEMBRI. ANNO M.D.XIX. SVMPTV LODOVICI HORNKEN BIBLIOPOLAE.
The worlds of Aulus Gellius
"Aulus Gellius originated the modern use of 'classical' and 'humanities.' This study examines his life and writings" --Provided by publisher
The Problem of Property in the Work of Aulus Gellius
В статье анализируется используемая Авлом Геллием в его сочинении терминология, касающаяся обозначения права собственности. The author analyzes the terms used by Aulus Gellius and related to designate property and ownership
Noctium atticarum libri XX
summa accuratione Ioannis Connelli ... ad recognitionem Beroaldinam repositi ...Druckermarke auf Titelbl. (Renouard 887)Bogensignaturen: ā⁸,ab-z&⁸,⁴,AB-CD⁸,
Народные сходки в Древнем Риме: античные дефиниции Contiones в источниках
At the present time the contio — a type of political meeting in ancient Rome — attracts close attention of scholars. It is difficult but important to determine exactly which meetings were considered as contiones. Possible solution to this problem is a key part in understanding the specificity and role of contiones. Fortunately we have a few direct contiones’ definitions offered by ancient authors (Marcus Valerius Messalla Rufus, Verrius Flaccus, Sextus Pompeius Festus and others). Through the study of these definitions the paper attempts to ascertain criteria for the identification a meeting as a contio. The aim of the research is to find universal essential features, i.e. those which described not some, but any contio: its audience, convener and general purpose. Therefore attention is paid to the criteria which are the least strict, noted in most definitions, and do not contradict the descriptions of particular contiones. It is concluded that definitions found in the Roman sources provide important information
which is, however, insufficient for understanding what meetings were considered
by the Romans as contiones. A strategy of subsequent study o f the issue is also suggested. В настоящее время contio - один из видов собраний в Древнем Риме - привлекает внимание многих исследователей. Важно точно определить, какие собрания рассматривались в качестве contiones. В распоряжении антиковедов имеются дефиниции contiones, передаваемые древними авторами (Марком Валерием Мессалой Руфом, Веррием Флакком, Секстом Помпеем Фестом и другими). Через изучение этих дефиниций в статье делается попытка определить критерии определения собрания как contio. Делается вывод о том, что одних определений недостаточно для выяснения специфики contiones. Предлагаются пути дальнейшего исследования проблемы
Gellius the Etymologist
I have elucidated Gellius' linguistic skills as an etymologist by seeking to isolate those derivations he hit on for himself. Furthermore, or in other words, I have compared several etymological explanations given in the Noctes Atticae with the methods of modern linguistics: that allows a positive judgment about Gellius as etymologist
Aulus Gellius und die Noctes Atticae : Die literarische Konstruktion einer Sammlung
Aulus Gellius’ Noctes Atticae is a collection of short texts that pursues an aesthetic of variation. Beer’s study is an appraisal of the texts and the collection in general. The author analyzes Noctes Atticae based on narratological criteria, develops associative links between the sections, and illuminates the agonal relationship between narrator and implicit reader
- …
