1,720,987 research outputs found

    Aulo Gelli, Pre-School Meals as a Platform for Behavior Change at Community Level: A Cluster Randomized Trial

    No full text
    Aulo Gelli POLICY SEMINAR Using Malawi’s Community-Based Childcare Centers to Implement an Agriculture and Nutrition Intervention Co-organized by IFPRI, the University of Washington led SEEMS nutrition project, and the CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Improved Nutrition and Health (A4NH

    Aulu-Gelle et Favorinus, lecteur et ‘philologue’ des texts latins

    No full text
    Analisi del ruolo di Favorino all'interno dell'opera di Aulo Gelli

    School milk initiative: Impact of adding milk to a micronutrient fortified school feeding program: An effectiveness trial in humanitarian settings

    No full text
    Presentation given July 30, 2024 for CGIAR Research Initiative on Fragility, Conflict, and Migration given on behalf of Aulo Gelli, Dalia El Sabbagh, Monica George Michail, and the School Milk Initiative Trial Group. IFPRI consultants: Monica George Michail, Dalia Elsabbagh, and in-country colleagues

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    School feeding and girls' enrolment: Understanding the effects of alternative implementation modalities in low-income, food-insecure settings across Sub-Saharan Africa.

    No full text
    Background: School feeding interventions are implemented in nearly every country in the world, with the potential to support the education, health and nutrition of school children. There is little evidence to show that different school feeding modalities have different effects. Objective: To examine the influence of different school feeding modalities on primary school enrolment, particularly for girls, in 32 countries across sub-Saharan Africa.Methods: An observational study involving a meta-analysis of survey data was developed to examine programme effect. Schools were divided by type and length of program: those with existing programs, those that had had school feeding for less than one year, and a counterfactual including schools without a programme. The intervention consisted of two different types of school feeding: onsite meals alone or onsite meals plus take-home rations. Changes in enrolment over a one-year period were used to assess effects of school feeding. To control for pre-programme characteristics, data on covariates were also examined. Using this design a comparison of enrolment levels was made between the types of treatment schools and controls schools during the period school feeding was first introduced. Standard multiple regression models were used to analyse programme effect.Results: School feeding was found to have statistically significant increases in enrolment, with effect size of about 10 percent. The changes on enrolment varied by modality of school feeding provision and by gender, with onsite meals appearing to have stronger effects in the first year of treatment in the lower primary grades, and onsite combined with take-home rations also being effective post-year 1, particularly for girls that were receiving the extra take-home rations.Conclusions: School feeding programmes had a positive impact on school enrolment. The operational nature of the survey data used in the meta-analysis, however, limits the robustness of the findings

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore