1,720,973 research outputs found
La nascita della cogenitorialità: un’analisi dei processi dinamici sottostanti e dell’organizzazione dei servizi territoriali coinvolti in questa fase
Studies confirm that a child’s place within a family begins to be determined from the outset of pregnancy and they focus on the parents’ influence on the development of the child. Some preliminary data from a larger longitudinal study (30 couples of new-parents were observed from the 7th month of pregnancy to the child’s first year) are presented and are used: to study the processes involved in co-parenthood; to identify risk situations; to allow comparison and exchange among local operators in order to reorganise services. The data relate to 10 couples that were under observation from the 7th month of pregnancy to the 3rd month after the child was born. Interviews and questionnaires show that couples tackled the “birth” from within; the family of origin is a resource and something to be kept apart; the need of social support; satisfaction of the couple, which decreases after childbirth, represents a risk factor when associated with factors such as the difficulty in making “room” for the baby and anxiety. It emerges that it is necessary to both further studies which allow risk factors to be identified which may negatively influence the family unit in this phase and also to necessitate the reorganisation of services towards paternal involvement
Noise control in ornamental stones sawmills using open sound absorbing and insulating screens
Determinazione della potenza sonora con l’ausilio del metodo della massima verosimiglianza
Acoustic impact of hand drilling on working and neighbouring environment in quarrying operations
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
