1,721,055 research outputs found

    sj-pptx-1-jet-10.1177_15266028211057085 – Supplemental material for A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 12-Month Patency After Intervention for Iliofemoral Obstruction Using Dedicated or Non-Dedicated Venous Stents

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-pptx-1-jet-10.1177_15266028211057085 for A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 12-Month Patency After Intervention for Iliofemoral Obstruction Using Dedicated or Non-Dedicated Venous Stents by Ghulam M. Majeed, Krishan Lodhia, Jemima Carter, Jack Kingdon, Rachael I. Morris, Adam Gwozdz, Athanasios Saratzis and Prakash Saha in Journal of Endovascular Therapy</p

    sj-docx-1-jet-10.1177_15266028231173297 – Supplemental material for Acute Kidney Injury Following Revascularization in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia and Non-Dialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease: Insights From the NSQIP Database at 30-Day Follow-Up

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-jet-10.1177_15266028231173297 for Acute Kidney Injury Following Revascularization in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia and Non-Dialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease: Insights From the NSQIP Database at 30-Day Follow-Up by Konstantinos Stavroulakis, Nikolaos Tsilimparis, Athanasios Saratzis, Barbara Rantner, Jan Stana, Anand Dayama, Mark G. Davies and Ryan Gouveia e Melo in Journal of Endovascular Therapy</p

    sj-pdf-1-vmj-10.1177_1358863X241231943 – Supplemental material for Safety and effectiveness of the phoenix atherectomy device for endovascular treatment of common femoral and popliteal arteries: Results of the EN-MOBILE trial

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-vmj-10.1177_1358863X241231943 for Safety and effectiveness of the phoenix atherectomy device for endovascular treatment of common femoral and popliteal arteries: Results of the EN-MOBILE trial by Christoph Schöfthaler, Nicola Troisi, Giovanni Torsello, Amila Jehn, Michael Lichtenberg, Jan C Karcher, Konstantinos Stavroulakis, Mario D’Oria, Athanasios Saratzis, Hany Zayed, Martin Andrassy and Grigorios Korosoglou in Vascular Medicine</p

    Author Correction: AGREE-S: AGREE II extension for surgical interventions: appraisal instrument (Surgical Endoscopy, (2022), 36, 8, (5547-5558), 10.1007/s00464-022-09354-z)

    No full text
    This article was updated to correct Alessandro Montedori’s name. Collaborative authorship: The GAP Consortium: Yasser Sami Abdel Dayem, Luca Bertolaccini, Pablo Alonso- Coello, Elie Akl, Manish Chand, John J. Como, Gert J. de Borst, Salomone Di Saverio, Sameh Emile, Bang Wool Eom, Ramon Gorter, George Hanna, Kaisa Immonen, Quirino Lai, Nicolaas Lumen, Joseph L. Mathew, Alessandro Montendori, Martin Moya, Gianluca Pellino, Alvaro Sanabria, Athanasios Saratzis, Neil Smart, Dimitrios Stefanidis, Giovanni Zaninotto

    Author Correction: AGREE-S: AGREE II extension for surgical interventions: appraisal instrument (Surgical Endoscopy, (2022), 36, 8, (5547-5558), 10.1007/s00464-022-09354-z)

    No full text
    This article was updated to correct Alessandro Montedori’s name. Collaborative authorship: The GAP Consortium: Yasser Sami Abdel Dayem, Luca Bertolaccini, Pablo Alonso- Coello, Elie Akl, Manish Chand, John J. Como, Gert J. de Borst, Salomone Di Saverio, Sameh Emile, Bang Wool Eom, Ramon Gorter, George Hanna, Kaisa Immonen, Quirino Lai, Nicolaas Lumen, Joseph L. Mathew, Alessandro Montendori, Martin Moya, Gianluca Pellino, Alvaro Sanabria, Athanasios Saratzis, Neil Smart, Dimitrios Stefanidis, Giovanni Zaninotto

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
    corecore