1,720,991 research outputs found
Praxisempfehlungen für die Therapie und Überwachung von Mogamulizumab‐Patienten in Deutschland
Zusammenfassung Mycosis fungoides (MF) und Sézary‐Syndrom (SS) sind die häufigsten Subtypen der heterogenen Gruppe der kutanen T‐Zell‐Lymphome (CTCL). Mit der Erweiterung der Therapielandschaft sind in den letzten Jahren neue Behandlungsoptionen verfügbar geworden, allen voran der gegen den C‐C‐Chemokinrezeptor 4 (CCR4) gerichtete monoklonale Antikörper Mogamulizumab. Auf der Grundlage der Phase‐III‐Zulassungsstudie wird Mogamulizumab in den deutschen S2k‐Leitlinien für die Zweitlinienbehandlung von SS und MF ab Stadium IB nach mindestens einer vorherigen systemischen Therapie empfohlen. Seitdem wurden durch Post‐hoc‐Analysen und Praxiserfahrungen neue Erkenntnisse zur Sicherheit und Wirksamkeit von Mogamulizumab gewonnen. CTCL‐Experten haben die verfügbare Literatur und eigene Erfahrungen diskutiert und entsprechende Empfehlungen für den Einsatz von Mogamulizumab in der klinischen Praxis in Deutschland entwickelt. Die Empfehlungen umfassen Patientenkriterien, vorherige Therapien, den Einsatz von Mogamulizumab als Mono‐ oder Kombinationstherapie, das Management von Nebenwirkungen, die Dauer der Therapie und die Überwachung von Patienten. Ziel dieser klinischen Empfehlungen ist es, das medizinische Fachpersonal bei der Entscheidungsfindung und dem Einsatz von Mogamulizumab in der täglichen Praxis zu unterstützen
Practical recommendations for therapy and monitoring of mogamulizumab patients in Germany
Summary Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) are the most common subtypes of the heterogeneous group of cutaneous T‐cell lymphomas (CTCL). With the expansion of the biologic treatment landscape, new treatment options have become available in recent years, most notably the C‐C chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4)‐directed monoclonal antibody mogamulizumab. Based on the phase III pivotal trial, mogamulizumab is recommended by the German S2k guidelines for the second‐line treatment of stage IB and above SS and MF, after at least one prior systemic therapy. Since then, new insights on safety and efficacy of mogamulizumab were generated by post hoc analyses and real‐world evidence. A panel of CTCL‐experts discussed available literature and own experiences and developed relevant recommendations on the use of mogamulizumab in clinical practice in Germany. The recommendations cover patient criteria, prior therapies, use of mogamulizumab as monotherapy or combination therapy, management of side effects, duration of therapy, and monitoring schedules. The aim of these clinical recommendations is to support healthcare professionals in their decision‐making and use of mogamulizumab in daily practice
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
