1,720,997 research outputs found
Twenty-first century cancer patterns in small island nations: Grenada and the English-speaking Caribbean
No full textGrenada is a small island nation of 105,000 in the Caribbean with one single general hospital and pathology laboratory. This study assesses cancer incidence on the island based on existing pathology reports, and compares the cancer mortality burden between Grenada and other Caribbean nations.Age-adjusted overall and site-specific cancer “incidence” rates (based on pathology reports) and mortality rates were calculated and compared for 2000–2009. Next, mortality rates for a more recent period, 2007–2013, were calculated for Grenada and a pool of English-speaking, majority African-ancestry Caribbean island nations. Lastly, for direct mortality comparisons by cancer site, mortality rate ratios were computed using negative binomial regression modeling.The pathology reports alone do not suffice to calculate national incidence rates but cancer mortality rates are rapidly increasing in Grenada. The leading causes of cancer mortality were prostate and lung cancers among men, and breast and cervical cancers among women. Overall cancer mortality is significantly higher for both male and female Grenadians than their Caribbean counterparts: RR 1.43 (95% CI 1.32–1.55) and RR 1.26 (95% CI 1.15–1.38), respectively. High prostate and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma rates are concerning.Given the small existing cancer infrastructure, excessive mortality in Grenada compared to its neighbors may be disproportionately more attributable to low survival than a high cancer risk. Global solutions will be required to meet the cancer control needs of geographically isolated small nations such as Grenada
THE COLORECTAL CANCER CONTINUUM: ELUCIDATING DIFFERENCES WITHIN THE HETEROGENEOUS BLACK POPULATION
No full textBackground and PurposeGlobally and in the United States (US), colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death, following lung cancer. In addition, there are established racial disparities in incidence and mortality for this disease, where ethnic minority groups have higher incidence and mortality rates. Blacks currently have the second-highest rates of CRC incidence and mortality, are diagnosed at more advanced stages, and have the lowest 5-year survival rates of all racial groups. Multiple influences impact this disparity including area- and individual-level factors. Area-level factors, encompassing social determinants of health (e.g. area-level poverty, housing characteristics, etc.), play a role in disease etiology and outcomes. In addition, timely CRC screening (CRCS) reduces CRC incidence and mortality; however, screening patterns, globally and in the US, are not optimal and differ by race, with ethnic minority groups having low CRCS adherence compared to non-Hispanic whites. Differences in CRCS behaviors and outcomes have been noted for Blacks, a term used to describe, for example, a heterogeneous racial group comprised of US-born Blacks and immigrants from Africa and the Caribbean. While CRCS barriers are well documented for the general population, CRCS barriers are less understood for Blacks and very little is known about CRCS habits and CRCS barriers within this heterogeneous racial group, with limited research including Caribbean immigrants and no known research including African-born immigrants. This dissertation uses a mixed-methods approach to describe CRC incidence, advanced stage at diagnosis, and mortality, CRCS behaviors, and CRCS barriers within the heterogeneous Black population in Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania.
Aim 1. Assess colorectal cancer incidence, advanced stage at diagnosis, and colorectal cancer mortality, overall and among individuals who identify as Black/African American, and contextual disparities in Philadelphia County utilizing data from the Pennsylvania State Cancer Registry (2010–2016) and relevant US Census and American Community Survey data.
Aim 2. Determine colorectal cancer screening adherence for Cancer Prevention Project of Philadelphia (CAP3) participants who self-identify as Black.
Aim 3: Conduct gender-specific focus groups to elucidate the principal barriers to colorectal cancer screening adherence within an average-risk group of adults, ages 45–75, who self-identify as Black or African American, in an urban population.
Methods
Aim 1. Using an ecological design, descriptive, geographic spatial clustering and hierarchical logistic regression analyses were done to describe CRC incidence, advanced stage at diagnosis, and colorectal cancer-specific mortality in Philadelphia County at the individual- and area-level. CRC incidence, stage at diagnosis, and mortality data for histologically confirmed CRC cases were obtained from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry from 2010 to 2016, with mortality data including deaths through 2020. Area-level data were retrieved from the US Census Bureau, American Community Survey, etc. Individual- and area-level descriptive characteristics were calculated for all CRC incident cases, cases diagnosed at advanced stage, and colorectal cancer-specific mortality, overall and for whites and Blacks. Geographic clusters with higher-than-expected relative risk for each outcome of interest at the census tract level (HRCT) were identified and individual- and area-level descriptive statistics were calculated for Blacks, overall and by HRCT status. Adjusted hierarchical logistic regression analyses using backward stepwise elimination with model quasi-information criterion was performed to identify potential predictors of HRCTs for CRC incidence and advanced stage at diagnosis.
Aim 2. Cross-sectional data from age-eligible adults, 50–75 years (N=357) participating in the ongoing CAP3 study was used to measure CRCS prevalence and adherence and region of birth (e.g., Caribbean-, African-, US-born). Prevalence and adherence were based on contemporaneous US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines. Descriptive statistics and adjusted prevalence and adherence proportions were calculated by region of birth. Adjusted logistic regression models were performed to assess the association between region of birth and overall CRCS and modality-specific adherence.
Aim 3. To assess CRCS barriers, we conducted six sex-specific focus groups (n=3 female, n=3 male) with individuals, ages 45-75, who self-identified as Black (i.e., US-, Caribbean, or African-born) and were. Focus groups were held in person and via Zoom, recorded and transcribed verbatim. Codes were developed using coding consensus, co-occurrence, and comparison and open, axial, and selective coding rooted in grounded theory. Dedoose was used to determine CRCS barrier themes as well as general and modality-specific barriers by sex and by region of birth.
Results
Aim 1. In Philadelphia County, there were 4,641 CRC incident cases, of which 2,086 (44.9%) were non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and 2,555 (53.1%) were white. Mean age at diagnosis for CRC incidence (65.0 vs. 68.9 years), advanced stage at diagnosis (63.2 vs. 67.4 years), and colorectal cancer-specific mortality (67.5 vs. 71.7 years) was lower for Blacks compared to whites (p-value<0.001). Blacks were also diagnosed at a more advanced stage (25.0% vs. 22.4%, p-value=0.038) or unknown stage (8.01% vs. 5.64%, p-value=0.001). For each outcome, when compared to whites, higher proportions of Blacks lived in areas with higher proportions of markers of low socio-economic status and lower proportions of CRCS adherence. Geographic clusters at a higher-than-expected risk of CRC incidence were found in Northeast Philadelphia, North Philadelphia, West Philadelphia, and Southwest Philadelphia. Geographic clusters at a higher-than-expected risk of CRC diagnosed at an advanced stage and colorectal cancer-specific mortality overlapped and were in the North, Kensington, and Southwest neighborhoods of Philadelphia. Area-level NHB, the primary independent variable of interest, reduced the odds of HRCT for CRC incidence (OR: 0.971, 95% CI: 0.960, 0.983) and was not significantly associated with HRCT for advanced stage at diagnosis. In addition, after adjustment, for every one-unit increase in the percent of area-level foreign-born Blacks, there was 1.17-increased odds of being a HRCT for CRC incidence (95% CI: 1.07, 1.28). Similarly, there was a significant positive association with area-level foreign-born Black and being in a HRCT for advanced stage at diagnosis (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.26). Other area-level variables that were associated with HRCT for CRC incidence were median rent, percent of mortgaged housing units, and per capita income, which reduced the odds of being a HRCT; Percent of mortgaged housing units also reduced the odds of being a HRCT for advanced stage at diagnosis. Further, CRCS adherence reduced the odds of being a HRCT for advanced stage at diagnosis by approximately 15% (OR: 0.849, 95% CI: 0.791, 0.911).
Aim 2. Respondents were 69.5% female, 43.3% married/living with a partner, and 38.4% had <$25,000 annual income. Overall, 78.2% reported past CRCS; however, stool test had the lowest prevalence overall (34.6%). Caribbean (95.0%) and African immigrants (90.2%) had a higher prevalence of overall CRCS compared to US-born Blacks (59.2%) (p-value <0.001). African immigrants were five times more likely to adhere to overall CRCS than US-born Blacks (OR: 5.25, 95% CI: 1.34, 20.6). Immigrants had higher odds of being adherent to colonoscopy (Caribbean=OR: 6.84, 95% CI: 1.49, 31.5; African =OR: 7.15, 95% CI: 1.27, 40.3) compared to US-born Blacks.
Aim 3. The majority of focus group participants were 60–64 years old and 72% were immigrants (41% African-born, 31% Caribbean-born). Most participants had had CRCS, but 45% were non-adherent to national CRCS guidelines. Overall, lack of knowledge/awareness, fear, and a sense of feeling healthy and subsequently not seeing the need for CRCS emerged as overarching themes to CRCS barriers. General barriers differed by gender: for women lack of physician recommendation or explanation of CRCS was important and for men not knowing anyone with a history of CRCS was commonly cited. .” Differences in modality-specific barriers by gender were also noted. Barriers also differed by region of birth. US-born Blacks described lack of community advocacy promoting CRC and CRCS awareness as a barrier. African-born Blacks expressed lack of routine CRCS and utilization of preventive medicine in their native country as barriers. US- and Caribbean-born Black males, communicated that discussing CRCS was taboo, which was tied to hegemonic masculinity leading to a lack of conversations about CRC and CRCS. The use of traditional home remedies emerged as a barrier given respondents felt these remedies would aid in preventing CRC thereby reducing the need for CRCS. Immigrant Blacks also described limited insurance coverage due to their citizenship status.
Conclusions
This dissertation provides the first known insight into various outcomes across the colorectal cancer continuum for the heterogeneous Black population including the growing immigrant Black subgroups in Philadelphia County. To reduce CRC incidence and mortality, interventions and resources to increase CRCS uptake need to target geographic locations with higher percentages of foreign-born Blacks, lower CRCS adherence, and areas with worse socio-economic markers. Also, while Black immigrants had higher CRCS adherence compared to US-born Blacks, CRCS is still sub-optimal in the Black population. Further, CRCS barriers exist and differ by gender, and importantly, there are nuanced barriers by region of birth. Thus, efforts to increase CRCS should address the common and unique barriers and promote stool-based testing, as stool test adherence was low and focus group participants were unfamiliar with this modality as it is not widely promoted or available in clinical practice. In short, these findings across the colorectal cancer continuum should be taken into account for resource allocation and when designing targeted or tailored interventions to promote CRCS uptake for the heterogeneous Black population, which would reduce CRC incidence, late-stage diagnosis, and mortality.Epidemiolog
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Increasing Pap Testing Uptake and HPVV Knowledge and Acceptability among Black Women
No full textWomen were recruited from two socioeconomically and ethnically similar regions to participate in the intervention. Regions were assigned to one of two conditions: print only or print plus media-based social marketing. Baseline and follow-up data were collected and analyzed using univariate and bivariate statistical approaches. There was a statistically significant relationship between intervention condition and reporting a Pap test at follow up (p = .013). Compared to women in the print only condition, women in the print plus media-based social marketing condition reported significantly increased Pap testing. Across both conditions, intention to receive Pap testing was high. In the print only condition, 37 out of 40 (92.5%) participants reported intention to receive Pap screening within two years, while 47 out of 57 (82.5%) participants in the print and media condition reported intention to have a test within two years. HPVV knowledge increased among all participants with no differences across intervention condition. The print only group reported no change in Pap test completion at follow up. However, the enhanced trial condition showed a 25% increase in Pap testing from baseline to follow-up. Therefore, in both intervention conditions, HPV knowledge and HPVV acceptability significantly increased from baseline to follow-up among all participants. This study suggests a multicomponent media-based social marketing strategy may be useful in promoting Pap testing and knowledge about HPVV among Black women
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
