1,720,996 research outputs found
Rebuttal letter to reviewers of "Investigating Invalid DOIs in COCI"
This document is a rebuttal letter to the reviews received on the protocol:
Nooshin Shahidzadeh, Alessia Cioffi, Arianna Moretti, Sara Coppini 2021. Investigating Invalid DOIs in COCI. protocols.io https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bt5xnq7n.
The reviews considered in this document are:
1) Deniz Tural. (2021). Review of: "Investigating Invalid DOIs in COCI v1 (protocols.io.bt5xnq7n)". Qeios. doi:10.32388/WHWOI8.
2) Arcangelo Massari. (2021). Review of: "Investigating Invalid DOIs in COCI". Qeios. doi:10.32388/X2DX81.
Answers and comments provided to the suggestions and notes of the reviews are written by the very same authors of the protocol: Nooshin Shahidzadeh, Alessia Cioffi, Arianna Moretti, and Sara Coppini
V2O5 electrodes with extended cycling ability and improved rate performance using polyacrylic acid as binder
In this work the electrochemical characterization of V2O5 electrodes, prepared using polyacrylic acid (PAA) as binder, is presented. The obtained electrodes display stable high capacity values (250 mAh g-1) when cycled at low rates (44 mA g-1), and a reversible capacity of 90 mAh g-1 is obtained at high specific current (3A g-1). The PAA-based electrodes possess an excellent cycling ability with a capacity retention of 94 % after 100 cycles. The present study demonstrate the possibility to overcome the dramatic capacity fading of V2O5 by a simple approach, permitting to obtain electrochemical performance similar to those of more complicated nano-architectures via the use of a greener electrode manufacturing process
Response Letter to the reviewers of "Investigating DOIs' Classes of Errors"
Response letter to the reviews:
Alessia Cioffi. (2021). Review of: "Investigating DOIs' classes of errors". Qeios. doi:10.32388/1PV0Y2
Arianna Moretti. (2021). Review of: "Investigating DOIs' Classes of Errors". Qeios. doi:10.32388/RWNSQ
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
The Integration of the Japan Link Center’s Bibliographic Data into OpenCitations: The production of bibliographic and citation data structured according to the OpenCitations Data Model, originating from an Anglo-Japanese dataset
In this article, we present OpenCitations’ main data collections: the unified index of citation data (OpenCitations Index), and the bibliographic data corpus (OpenCitations Meta) in view of the integration of a new dataset provided by the Japan Link Center (JaLC). Based on a computational analysis of the titles of the publications performed in October 2023, 8.6% of the bibliographic metadata stored in OpenCitations Meta are not in English. Nevertheless, the ingestion of an Anglo-Japanese dataset represents the first opportunity to test the soundness of a language-agnostic metadata crosswalk process for collecting data from multilingual sources, aiming to preserve bibliodiversity and to minimize information loss considering the constraints imposed by the OpenCitations data model, which does not allow the acceptance of multiple values in different translations for the same metadata field. The JaLC dataset is set to join OpenCitations’ collections in November 2023, and it will be made available in RDF, CSV, and SCHOLIX formats. Data will be produced using open-source software and provided under a CC0 license via API services, web browsing interfaces, Figshare data dumps, and SPARQL endpoints, ensuring high interoperability, reuse, and semantic exploitation
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
