1,721,069 research outputs found
The ACM PODS Alberto O. Mendelzon Test-of-Time Award 2023
In 2007, the PODS Executive Committee decided to establish a Test-of-Time Award, named after the late Alberto O. Mendelzon, in recognition of his scientific legacy, and his service and dedication to the database community. Mendelzon was an international leader in database theory, whose pioneering and fundamental work has inspired and influenced both database theoreticians and practitioners, and continues to be applied in a variety of advanced settings. He served the database community in many ways; in particular, he served as the General Chair of the PODS conference, and was instrumental in bringing together the PODS and SIGMOD conferences. He also was an outstanding educator, who guided the research of numerous doctoral students and postdoctoral fellows. The Award is to be awarded each year to a paper or a small number of papers published in the PODS proceedings ten years prior, that had the most impact (in terms of research, methodology, or transfer of practice) over the intervening decade. The decision was approved by SIGMOD and ACM. The funds for the Award were contributed by IBM Toronto. The PODS Executive Chair has appointed us to serve as the Award Committee for 2023. After careful consideration, we have decided to select the following two papers as the award winners for 2023: The first paper introduces the Massively Parallel Communication (MPC) model to analyze the tradeoff between the number of rounds and the amount of communication required in a massively parallel computing environment. A decade ago there was a growing interest in the study of data processing on large distributed clusters, which resulted in the introduction of various models focusing on different aspects. The MPC model can be seen as the culmination of these models and was designed as an abstraction for the shared-nothing architecture which remains the architecture used by large data processing systems today. Since then, the MPC model is widely adopted in the literature. In the paper, the authors obtain both lower and upper bounds for computing full conjunctive queries in the one round and multi-round case. In particular, they discover an interesting connection between the number of bits that are required to be sent in the single-round case for computing a conjunctive query and the fractional vertex covering number of the hypergraph associated to that query. The monograph "Algorithmic Aspects of Parallel Data Processing" in Foundations and Trends in Databases (2018) presents a detailed overview of the research on the MPC model since its introduction. Ontology-based data access (OBDA) provides a formalization of the problem of querying a database enhanced with an ontology. This simple formal model provides a unifying view for problems in many different areas, and in particular for the widely studied issue of extracting information from a knowledge graph. As such, OBDA has been extensively studied, mainly following two lines of research: the development of efficient query answering algorithms for some classes of query and ontology languages, and the characterization of combinations of these two elements that lead to intractability. In the second paper, the authors follow a different path to study OBDA, which has brought new tools to the area and, as such, has become a fruitful way to address the fundamental challenges in OBDA. More precisely, the authors consider the expressive power of the settings used in OBDA, whose main parameters are the query and ontology
The ACM PODS Alberto O. Mendelzon Test-of-Time Award 2023
In 2007, the PODS Executive Committee decided to establish a Test-of-Time Award, named after the late Alberto O. Mendelzon, in recognition of his scientific legacy, and his service and dedication to the database community. Mendelzon was an international leader in database theory, whose pioneering and fundamental work has inspired and influenced both database theoreticians and practitioners, and continues to be applied in a variety of advanced settings. He served the database community in many ways; in particular, he served as the General Chair of the PODS conference, and was instrumental in bringing together the PODS and SIGMOD conferences. He also was an outstanding educator, who guided the research of numerous doctoral students and postdoctoral fellows. The Award is to be awarded each year to a paper or a small number of papers published in the PODS proceedings ten years prior, that had the most impact (in terms of research, methodology, or transfer of practice) over the intervening decade. The decision was approved by SIGMOD and ACM. The funds for the Award were contributed by IBM Toronto. The PODS Executive Chair has appointed us to serve as the Award Committee for 2023. After careful consideration, we have decided to select the following two papers as the award winners for 2023: The first paper introduces the Massively Parallel Communication (MPC) model to analyze the tradeoff between the number of rounds and the amount of communication required in a massively parallel computing environment. A decade ago there was a growing interest in the study of data processing on large distributed clusters, which resulted in the introduction of various models focusing on different aspects. The MPC model can be seen as the culmination of these models and was designed as an abstraction for the shared-nothing architecture which remains the architecture used by large data processing systems today. Since then, the MPC model is widely adopted in the literature. In the paper, the authors obtain both lower and upper bounds for computing full conjunctive queries in the one round and multi-round case. In particular, they discover an interesting connection between the number of bits that are required to be sent in the single-round case for computing a conjunctive query and the fractional vertex covering number of the hypergraph associated to that query. The monograph "Algorithmic Aspects of Parallel Data Processing" in Foundations and Trends in Databases (2018) presents a detailed overview of the research on the MPC model since its introduction. Ontology-based data access (OBDA) provides a formalization of the problem of querying a database enhanced with an ontology. This simple formal model provides a unifying view for problems in many different areas, and in particular for the widely studied issue of extracting information from a knowledge graph. As such, OBDA has been extensively studied, mainly following two lines of research: the development of efficient query answering algorithms for some classes of query and ontology languages, and the characterization of combinations of these two elements that lead to intractability. In the second paper, the authors follow a different path to study OBDA, which has brought new tools to the area and, as such, has become a fruitful way to address the fundamental challenges in OBDA. More precisely, the authors consider the expressive power of the settings used in OBDA, whose main parameters are the query and ontology
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
