1,720,975 research outputs found
Il bilancio di genere di ateneo come strumento di policy per la parità di genere
No full textThis paper aims to analyse the different policy frameworks that currently exist with regard to the introduction of gender policies in academia, starting with the tool of gender budgeting. The hypothesis to be explored is whether a reclassification of the various existing frameworks is possible, while suggesting a reclassification based on four frameworks defined as: neoliberalism, gender mainstreaming, work-life balance and the capability approach.Using also as parameters some fundamental concepts present in the literature on the topic, such as agency and individual sense of well-being, the mix of these elements in each approach results in a different level of fatigue, which could play an important role in diminishing the effectiveness of gender equality measures themselve
Gender Narratives in Academia: how gender is constructed through gender policies in Italian universities
No full textThis proposal aims to explore gender equality measures in the academic context, which is undergoing changes such as the recent introduction of the Gender Equality Plan requirement and the broadening of equality, diversity and inclusion topics, both in research and in the actions practically proposed. Assuming that gender is continuously made and 'unmade' through gender policies (Acker, 1990), the key question is what kind of gender narrative is proposed by these measures, often attributed to the framework of gender mainstreaming (O'Hagan and Klatzer, 2018). This paper aims to discuss and problematise this assumption from a theoretical and critical perspective, with the use of the methodology known as Critical Frame Analysis that originates in the field of public policy (Bacchi and Eveline, 2010). The use of Critical Frame Analysis applied to the main policy documents on gender measures and objectives at the Italian national level leads to a theoretical proposal on the reclassification of academic gender frameworks
When Gender Equality in Academia Takes a Toll on Agency and Well-being
No full textThe present paper aims to investigate the limits surrounding the implementation of gender equality in academia and the correlation between gender measures and the consequences on personal well-being. Despite the efforts to build more inclusive and equal environments, fatigue seems to affect all the university’s components, especially regarding the uncertainties of an academic career, seen as stressful, delusional, impossible to conciliate with motherhood. Even appropriate measures cannot deal with the fatigue of what is considered a “double presence”: they only allow complying with those standards. Moreover, emotional issues are deriving from choices seen as gender deviant, like not being the major caregiver in the family, and the personal agency is often diminished. The purpose of this study is to show how gender measures in universities are not as neutral and unambiguous as they may seem, but rather fall into one of four approaches to gender inequality itself. These four approaches can be identified as neoliberalism, gender mainstreaming, work-life balance, and the capabilities approach. Agency and well-being could be seen as pivotal aspects and the mix of those elements in each approach results in a different level of fatigue, which, along with stress and mental charge, could play a major role in diminishing the effectiveness of gender equality measures. The significance of this four-sided framework lies in the possibility to reclassify every single gender equality measure and the data collected to support it into one of the four approaches, alongside the opportunity to acknowledge fatigue and evaluate university politics like gender-responsive budgets and gender equality plans
Il bilancio di genere nelle università italiane. Come il genere viene costruito attraverso le policy di genere
No full textThis research stems from the necessity to critically understand a phenomenon
"new" as gender budgeting, especially in the Italian university context. Gender budgeting is a tool that is traced back to the framework of gender mainstreaming and consists of a contextual and financial analysis of the different impact that political decisions have on men and women, starting from the assumption that there are no truly neutral decisions. The purpose of the research is to approach gender budgeting from a critical and feminist perspective and not merely a descriptive one, with the aim of investigating the theoretical frameworks used in implementing gender budgets.
The main question that has guided the present research is how gender budgeting relates to the gender inequalities already present in academia and how it transforms the idea of gender equality that is promulgated by the university institution.
The project's main contribution lies precisely in having applied to the case of university and Italian gender budgets a critical methodology, the so-called Critical Frame Analysis, which until now had only been used to analyze broader phenomena such as gender mainstreaming. The goal was to understand how the "gender budget" tool has taken on its own characteristics in the Italian academic context and what kind of gender narratives can be found in these documents. Four main theoretical frameworks that can serve as the informational basis for gender budgets were traced, thus debunking the idea that this type of tool can be attributed solely to the approach of gender mainstreaming.
In conclusion, with the present work, an attempt was made to break down the gender budget into its constituent elements, in order to analyze to what kind of theoretical framework it was possible to relate each element, always taking into consideration how gender budgeting has been and is concretely implemented in the context of Italian universities, finally using the concrete experience of gender budgeting at the University of Genoa as a case study to analyze some of the phenomena that emerged in the course of this research
Evolving Concepts in LDL-Lowering Strategies: Are We There?
Full text linkHigh plasma levels of low density lipoproteins (LDLs) represent one of the major risk factors for cardiovascular disease, as shown by many epidemiological studies. On the other hand, randomized trials designed to address the clinical impact of lipid lowering interventions, have clearly shown that reduction in LDL plasma levels lead to a significant decrease in major cardiovascular events. Based on these observations, pharmacological modulation of LDLs has been highly investigated. Statins, alone or in combination, represent the most powerful agents to date available to reach the LDLs levels suggested by the current guidelines. However, in some patients the recommended LDL reduction is difficult to be achieved because of genetic background (familial hypercholesterolemia), side effects (statin intolerance), or simply because of a non-sufficient response. In the last few years, our understanding of the basic mechanisms involved in the lipoprotein metabolism has progressed significantly. The crucial role of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) has emerged. The main characterized function of PCSK9 relates to the binding to LDL-C receptors (LDLR) in hepatocytes. However, PCSK9 does not interfere with the binding between LDL and its own receptor, but with the ability of the latest to return to the surface of the hepatocyte and bind new LDL molecules. Based on these observations, blocking PCSK-9 may reduce the LDLR clearance, thus increasing the ability of LDLR to remove circulating LDLs. Pharmacological inhibition of this protein has been proposed as new therapeutic approach. The clinical evidence available to date seem to fully support this hypothesis
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
