1,721,212 research outputs found
Morning Chronicle; Nov. 30, 1835. Appendix No. 1. Excerpt from Archibald Constable.
No full textExcerpt from Archibald Constable and His literary Correspondents on 477 - 478
Selected poems /
No full textPublisher's advertisements: p. [247-248], p. 1-16 at end.Mode of access: Internet
Works Published by Archibald Constable & Company AND The State Papers & Letters of Sir Ralph Sadler, Knight Banneret
No full text4 pg
Theodore M. Davis’ Excavations : Bibân El Molûk. The Funeral Papyrus of Iouiya. With an Introduction by Edouard Naville. London Archibald Constable and Co., Ltd. 1908.
No full textAndersson Ernst. Theodore M. Davis’ Excavations : Bibân El Molûk. The Funeral Papyrus of Iouiya. With an Introduction by Edouard Naville. London Archibald Constable and Co., Ltd. 1908.. In: Sphinx : revue critique embrassant le domaine entier de l'égyptologie, vol. 12, 1909. pp. 141-144
A Publisher and His Friends Memoir and Correspondence of John Murray; with an Account of the Origin and Progress of the House, 1768-1843. John Murray to Mr. Archd. Constable. pp. 82 - 86.
No full textLetter from John Murray to Archibald Constable with response pp. 82 - 86
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
