2,085 research outputs found
The Fables: Gustave Moreau
No full textOccasional mention of Gustave Moreau and sample offerings of specific work of his did not prepare me for this revelation of the extent of his work on fables. Moreau created some 64 watercolor illustrations of La Fontaine's fables, first exhibited in 1886 and last exhibited in 1906. This present book is the catalogue of a recent exhibit at the Rothschilds' Waddesdon Manor. The book's author, Juliet Carey, was curator of that exhibit. The book, large format (9¾" x 12") and 168 pages long, gives accounts of Moreau's life, including the fable watercolors; of La Fontaine and the fables; and of animal studies by Moreau that prepared for this work. The bulk of the book is then an impressive catalogue featuring a large colored illustration of each of the 35 fables in the exhibit, starting with "Allegory of Fable," in which fable rides on a chimaera. Among the best, for me, are WS; "The Monkey and the Dolphin"; "Death and the Woodcutter," in which death is a seductive woman; and FK. The book's last pictorial section is a brief account of Felix Bracquemond's black and white etchings based on Moreau's fables. Of the many critical comments included here, the most helpful for me is that Moreau "explored states of consciousness." Moreau achieved early fame with popular works exploring mythology, e.g., "Oedipus and the Sphinx." This book is a new treasure in the collection!Juliet Care
Malherbe, Poésies, édition présentée, établie et annotée par Antoine Adam, 1982
No full textMoreau François. Malherbe, Poésies, édition présentée, établie et annotée par Antoine Adam, 1982. In: Littératures 8, automne 1983. pp. 138-139
Malherbe, Poésies, édition présentée, établie et annotée par Antoine Adam, 1982
No full textMoreau François. Malherbe, Poésies, édition présentée, établie et annotée par Antoine Adam, 1982. In: Littératures 8, automne 1983. pp. 138-139
Œuvres completes
No full textDie Illustrationen von Jean Michel Moreau wurden separat u.d.T. "Estampes Destinées A Orner L'èdition In Octavo De M. De Voltaire" in Paris gedruckt. Sie erschienen in Lieferungen zwischen 1785 und 1789. - Bengesco (T. 4, 2142, S. 105-107 und S. 123) weist 5 Ausgabevarianten auf unterschiedlichem Papier nach, davon 2 ohne die Illustrationen1808 erschienen 2 Bde "Supplement au recueil des lettres de M. de Voltaire", die als T. 71-72 angegeben werdenLaut Bengesco, T. 4, S. 112 verlegt von Beaumarchais (der dafür in Kehl die Société Littéraire-Typographique gründete), mit Annotationen von Condorcet, hrsg. von DecroixAusgabe in 70 Bänden. - Im "Preface Des Redacteurs" als "La Nouvelle Edition" bezeichnetVorlageform des Erscheinungsvermerks: De L'Imprimerie De La Société Littéraire-Typographique. - Auf dem Kupfertitel für die Tafeln: Variante A. A Paris, Chez Saugrain … Variante B. A Paris, Chez L'Auteur
Antoine Arnauld, Cartesian Philosopher
No full textInternational audienceNicknamed “the Grand Arnauld” by his contemporaries, Antoine Arnauld was a central figure in the intellectual life of the seventeenth century. This chapter presents a synthetic overview of the various aspects of Antoine Arnauld’s relationship to Cartesianism: his first exchanges with Descartes (in the Fourth Objections and correspondence), the “Port-Royal Logic”, and the numerous texts that he composed in the last years of his life, especially in his discussions with Malebranche, Leibniz, and the partisans of the doctrine of the “vision in God”. The chapter attempts to specify to what extent there is a “philosophy of Antoine Arnauld” and to determine whether Arnauld should be considered a “Cartesian” thinker.Une synthèse de la philosophie d'Antoine Arnauld considéré comme un auteur "cartésien"
Antoine Arnauld, Cartesian Philosopher
No full textInternational audienceNicknamed “the Grand Arnauld” by his contemporaries, Antoine Arnauld was a central figure in the intellectual life of the seventeenth century. This chapter presents a synthetic overview of the various aspects of Antoine Arnauld’s relationship to Cartesianism: his first exchanges with Descartes (in the Fourth Objections and correspondence), the “Port-Royal Logic”, and the numerous texts that he composed in the last years of his life, especially in his discussions with Malebranche, Leibniz, and the partisans of the doctrine of the “vision in God”. The chapter attempts to specify to what extent there is a “philosophy of Antoine Arnauld” and to determine whether Arnauld should be considered a “Cartesian” thinker.Une synthèse de la philosophie d'Antoine Arnauld considéré comme un auteur "cartésien"
Antoine Arnauld, Cartesian Philosopher
No full textInternational audienceNicknamed “the Grand Arnauld” by his contemporaries, Antoine Arnauld was a central figure in the intellectual life of the seventeenth century. This chapter presents a synthetic overview of the various aspects of Antoine Arnauld’s relationship to Cartesianism: his first exchanges with Descartes (in the Fourth Objections and correspondence), the “Port-Royal Logic”, and the numerous texts that he composed in the last years of his life, especially in his discussions with Malebranche, Leibniz, and the partisans of the doctrine of the “vision in God”. The chapter attempts to specify to what extent there is a “philosophy of Antoine Arnauld” and to determine whether Arnauld should be considered a “Cartesian” thinker.Une synthèse de la philosophie d'Antoine Arnauld considéré comme un auteur "cartésien"
Denis Moreau : Deux Cartésiens. La polémique entre Antoine Arnauld et Nicolas Malebranche, 1999. (Coll. «Bibliothèque d'histoire de la philosophie».)
No full textLarrère Catherine. Denis Moreau : Deux Cartésiens. La polémique entre Antoine Arnauld et Nicolas Malebranche, 1999. (Coll. «Bibliothèque d'histoire de la philosophie».). In: Dix-huitième Siècle, n°32, 2000. Le rire, sous la direction de Lise Andries . p. 679
A Canonical Form for PROV Documents: Dataset Underpinning Evaluation
No full textDataset supporting:
Luc Moreau (2017) A Canonical Form for PROV Documents and its Application to Equality, Signature, and Validation. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology.
We present a canonical form for PROV that is a normalized way of representing PROV documents as mathematical expressions. As opposed to the normal form specified by the PROV-CONSTRAINTS recommendation, the canonical form we present is defined for all PROV documents, irrespective of their validity, and it can be serialized in a unique way. The paper makes the case for a canonical form for PROV and its potential uses, namely: comparison of PROV documents in different formats, validation, and signature of PROV documents. A signature of a PROV document allows the integrity and the author of provenance to be ascertained; since the signature is based on the canonical form, these checks are not tied to a particular encoding, but can be performed on any representation of PROV.</span
- …
