5,954 research outputs found

    Replication Data for 'Taking the Time? Explaining Effortful Participation among Low-Cost Online Survey Participants'

    No full text
    These files constitute the replication materials for the article 'Taking the Time? Explaining Effortful Participation among Low-Cost Online Survey Participants', published in Research and Politics

    Replication Data for: Risk and Reform: Explaining Support for Constitutional Convention Referendums

    No full text
    Scholars of comparative constitutionalism and direct democracy agree that economic conditions affect public support for constitutional reform but disagree as to how. Prospect theory suggests both approaches may be correct, depending on the political and economic context in which voters operate. Fourteen states periodically ask their citizens whether to call a state constitutional convention, making this the oldest form of direct democracy in the United States. We test our theory in preelection polls in two of these states and a survey experiment. The results indicate negative perceptions of economic and government performance increase support for conventions when voters view them as opportunities to correct problems. On the other hand, if a convention represents a chance to improve on an acceptable status quo, voters with positive performance evaluations become more supportive. Our findings contribute to the heuristics literature and inform normative debates over direct democracy and popular constitutionalism

    Replication Data for 'Taking the Time? Explaining Effortful Participation among Low-Cost Online Survey Participants'

    No full text
    These files constitute the replication materials for the article 'Taking the Time? Explaining Effortful Participation among Low-Cost Online Survey Participants', published in Research and Politics

    Parenting in Privilege or Peril w/ Dr. Pamela Bennett

    No full text
    On this episode, Ian Anson speaks with Dr. Pamela Bennett, Professor in the School of Public Policy at UMBC, about her recent co-authored book: Parenting in Privilege or Peril: How Social Inequality Enables or Derails the American Dream. Check out the following links for more information on UMBC, CS3, and our host: The UMBC Center for the Social Sciences Scholarship The University of Maryland, Baltimore County Ian G. Anson, Ph.D.https://socialscience.umbc.edu/podcast/episode-41

    COVID-19 in the Courts w/ Dr. Susan Sterett

    No full text
    On this episode, Dr. Ian Anson speaks with Dr. Susan Sterett, Professor in the School of Public Policy at UMBC, about her recent book .https://socialscience.umbc.edu/episode-45

    The Social Science of Reading for Pleasure with Dr. Tamara Bhalla and Jean Kim

    No full text
    Director : Dr. Christine Mallinson. Associate Director: Dr. Philippe Filomeno. Production Assistants: Amy Barnes and Myriam Ralston. Undergraduate production assistant: Jean Kim. Theme music was composed and recorded by Diwan MorelandOn this episode, Dr. Anson speaks with Dr. Tamara Bhalla, Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of American Studies at UMBC. Dr. Bhalla is also an affiliate faculty in the UMBC Asian Studies program. We also hear from Jean Kim, our very own podcast production assistant, about her role as a research assistant on Dr. Bhalla’s forthcoming book on the cultural context of reading.https://socialscience.umbc.edu/podcast/episode-58

    Replication Data for "Epistemic Confidence Conditions the Effectiveness of Corrective Cues Against Political Misperceptions"

    No full text
    This dataset provides all materials necessary for replication of the research article entitled "Epistemic Confidence Conditions the Effectiveness of Corrective Cues Against Political Misperceptions," published in the journal Research & Politics in 2022

    Misperceptions are much harder to correct in people who know less than they think they do about politics.

    No full text
    The rise of political misinformation has become an important topic, as it can influence electoral outcomes. But correcting misinformation is complicated and often difficult. In new research, Ian G. Anson examines the link between people’s confidence and their own political beliefs and the ability to correct them. He finds that the more overconfident someone is about what they believe, the more likely they are to resist correction with accurate information

    Just the facts? Why Republicans and Democrats see the economy so differently

    No full text
    Ask a Republican and a Democrat if they think that economy is getting better or worse, and you are likely to get two different answers. But what influences how partisans arrive at their economic judgments? New research by Ian Anson suggests that partisans devote attention to credible, and not overtly biased, information about the economy to form their judgments—but only when it reinforces their preexisting beliefs

    The Legacy of Black Vaudeville w/ Dr. Michelle Scott

    No full text
    On this episode Dr. Anson speaks with Dr. Michelle Scott, Professor of History and Affiliate Faculty in Gender and Women’s Studies, Language, Literacy and Culture, and Africana Studies at UMBC, about her recent book: T.O.B.A. Time: Black Vaudeville and the Theater Owners’ Booking Association in Jazz-Age America Check out the following links for more information on UMBC, CS3, and our host: The UMBC Center for the Social Sciences Scholarship The University of Maryland, Baltimore County Ian G. Anson, Ph.D.https://socialscience.umbc.edu/podcast/episode-42
    corecore