5,954 research outputs found
Replication Data for 'Taking the Time? Explaining Effortful Participation among Low-Cost Online Survey Participants'
These files constitute the replication materials for the article 'Taking the Time? Explaining Effortful Participation among Low-Cost Online Survey Participants', published in Research and Politics
Replication Data for: Risk and Reform: Explaining Support for Constitutional Convention Referendums
Scholars of comparative constitutionalism and direct democracy agree
that economic conditions affect public support for constitutional reform
but disagree as to how. Prospect theory suggests both approaches may
be correct, depending on the political and economic context in which
voters operate. Fourteen states periodically ask their citizens whether to
call a state constitutional convention, making this the oldest form of
direct democracy in the United States. We test our theory in preelection polls in two of these states and a survey experiment. The
results indicate negative perceptions of economic and government
performance increase support for conventions when voters view them as
opportunities to correct problems. On the other hand, if a convention
represents a chance to improve on an acceptable status quo, voters with
positive performance evaluations become more supportive. Our findings
contribute to the heuristics literature and inform normative debates over
direct democracy and popular constitutionalism
Replication Data for 'Taking the Time? Explaining Effortful Participation among Low-Cost Online Survey Participants'
These files constitute the replication materials for the article 'Taking the Time? Explaining Effortful Participation among Low-Cost Online Survey Participants', published in Research and Politics
Parenting in Privilege or Peril w/ Dr. Pamela Bennett
On this episode, Ian Anson speaks with Dr. Pamela Bennett, Professor in the School of Public Policy at UMBC, about her recent co-authored book: Parenting in Privilege or Peril: How Social Inequality Enables or Derails the American Dream.
Check out the following links for more information on UMBC, CS3, and our host:
The UMBC Center for the Social Sciences Scholarship
The University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Ian G. Anson, Ph.D.https://socialscience.umbc.edu/podcast/episode-41
COVID-19 in the Courts w/ Dr. Susan Sterett
On this episode, Dr. Ian Anson speaks with Dr. Susan Sterett, Professor in the School of Public Policy at UMBC, about her recent book .https://socialscience.umbc.edu/episode-45
The Social Science of Reading for Pleasure with Dr. Tamara Bhalla and Jean Kim
Director : Dr. Christine Mallinson. Associate Director: Dr. Philippe Filomeno. Production Assistants: Amy Barnes and Myriam Ralston. Undergraduate production assistant: Jean Kim. Theme music was composed and recorded by Diwan MorelandOn this episode, Dr. Anson speaks with Dr. Tamara Bhalla, Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of American Studies at UMBC. Dr. Bhalla is also an affiliate faculty in the UMBC Asian Studies program. We also hear from Jean Kim, our very own podcast production assistant, about her role as a research assistant on Dr. Bhalla’s forthcoming book on the cultural context of reading.https://socialscience.umbc.edu/podcast/episode-58
Replication Data for "Epistemic Confidence Conditions the Effectiveness of Corrective Cues Against Political Misperceptions"
This dataset provides all materials necessary for replication of the research article entitled "Epistemic Confidence Conditions the Effectiveness of Corrective Cues Against Political Misperceptions," published in the journal Research & Politics in 2022
Misperceptions are much harder to correct in people who know less than they think they do about politics.
The rise of political misinformation has become an important topic, as it can influence electoral outcomes. But correcting misinformation is complicated and often difficult. In new research, Ian G. Anson examines the link between people’s confidence and their own political beliefs and the ability to correct them. He finds that the more overconfident someone is about what they believe, the more likely they are to resist correction with accurate information
Just the facts? Why Republicans and Democrats see the economy so differently
Ask a Republican and a Democrat if they think that economy is getting better or worse, and you are likely to get two different answers. But what influences how partisans arrive at their economic judgments? New research by Ian Anson suggests that partisans devote attention to credible, and not overtly biased, information about the economy to form their judgments—but only when it reinforces their preexisting beliefs
The Legacy of Black Vaudeville w/ Dr. Michelle Scott
On this episode Dr. Anson speaks with Dr. Michelle Scott, Professor of History and Affiliate Faculty in Gender and Women’s Studies, Language, Literacy and Culture, and Africana Studies at UMBC, about her recent book: T.O.B.A. Time: Black Vaudeville and the Theater Owners’ Booking Association in Jazz-Age America
Check out the following links for more information on UMBC, CS3, and our host:
The UMBC Center for the Social Sciences Scholarship
The University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Ian G. Anson, Ph.D.https://socialscience.umbc.edu/podcast/episode-42
- …
