1,721,028 research outputs found
Bruno et Montaigne: Chemins de la modernité
No full textInternational audienceCet ouvrage explore pour la première fois les relations entre les philosophies de Montaigne et de Bruno dans la perspective d’une confrontation spéculative qui se focalise aussi bien sur la rhétorique et l’éthique que sur l’ontologie et l’anthropologie
Etudes critiques
No full textAdam, Véronique et Noacco, Christina, La métamorphose et ses métamorphoses dans les littératures européennes. Histoire d’un décentrement ?, Albi, Presses du centre universitaire Champollion, 2010. Amielle, Ghislaine, « Traduction picturale et traduction littéraire des Métamorphoses d’Ovide, en France, à la Renaissance », Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé, 1989 no 3, p. 280-293. Ansaldi, Saverio, Giordano Bruno. Une philosophie de la métamorphose, Paris, Classiques Garnier, 2010. Bachel..
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
The World's Inner Eye or the Soul VisionMarsilio Ficino’ Symbolism in Platonic Theology : essay on Neoplatonic Aesthetic Interpretation
No full textOn connaît Marsile Ficin (1433−1499) comme étant l’auteur qui a influencé bon nombre d’artistes de la Renaissance, notamment par le succès de son Commentaire du Banquet de Platon. Mais Ficin est avant tout, pour nous, le père d'une théorie esthétique d'ordre symbolique présente dans toute son œuvre et dépassant les simples considérations sur l'art. Pour le comprendre, il nous a paru indispensable de nous intéresser de près à ses écrits symboliques, mais aussi de nous pencher sur sa vie. Une part importante de son symbolisme provient de l’orphisme et se retrouve dans l’ensemble de son œuvre, et particulièrement dans celle qui nous est apparue comme la plus importante : La Théologie platonicienne ou De l’Immortalité des Âmes. En se consacrant à l’âme, Ficin propose à son lecteur une nouvelle direction. Celle-ci inaugure le développement d’une métaphysique de la lumière d’inspiration hermétique dont l’œil, symbole de l’âme, est au cœur de sa réflexion. Cette œuvre majeure laisse ainsi place à une esthétique de la vision dont l’originalité tient en réalité de la redécouverte d’une tradition philosophique, spirituelle et esthétique antique oubliée à laquelle Ficin a su, selon nous, redonner vie de manière inspirée.We know Marsilio Ficino (1433-1499) as the author who influenced many artists of the Renaissance, notably through the success of his ‘Commentary on Plato's Symposium on Love’. But for us, Ficino is above all the father of an aesthetic theory of a symbolic nature that permeates all his work and goes beyond mere considerations of art. To understand him, we felt it essential to take a close look at his symbolic writings, but also to examine his life. A large part of his symbolism stems from Orphism and is to be found throughout his work, particularly in what we consider to be his most important work: ‘The Platonic Theology: On the Immortality of the Soul’. By devoting himself to the soul, Ficino offers his reader a new direction. It inaugurates the development of a metaphysics of light inspired by Hermeticism, in which the eye, symbol of the soul, is at the heart of his thinking. This major work thus gives way to an aesthetics of vision, the originality of which lies in the rediscovery of a forgotten ancient philosophical, spiritual and aesthetic tradition to which Ficino has, in our view, given inspired new life
Bibliographie
No full textAgamben, Giorgio, Enfance et histoire, Paris, Payot, 2000. Agel, Henri et Astre, Georges-Albert (dir.), Études cinématographiques, nº 1-2, « baroque et cinéma », Paris, Minard, « Lettres Modernes », printemps 1960. Angoulvent, Anne-Laure, L’esprit baroque, Paris, PUF, 1994. Ansaldi, Saverio, Spinoza et le baroque – infini, désir, multitude, Paris, Kimé, 2001. Aran, Giulio Carlo, L’Âge baroque, Genève, Albert Skira, 1994. Aumont, Jacques et Leutrat, Jean-Louis, Théorie du film, Paris, Albatros..
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
