1,720,987 research outputs found

    sj-docx-1-jet-10.1177_15266028231201098 – Supplemental material for Cost-Effectiveness of Endovascular Thrombectomy in M2 Occlusion Stroke: Real-World Experience Versus Clinical Trials

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-jet-10.1177_15266028231201098 for Cost-Effectiveness of Endovascular Thrombectomy in M2 Occlusion Stroke: Real-World Experience Versus Clinical Trials by Lan Gao, Elise Tan, Chushuang Chen, Timothy Kleinig, Bernard Yan, Andrew Cheung, Chris Levi, Carlos Garcia-Esperon, Dennis Cordato, Chris Blair, Longting Lin, Mark Parsons and Andrew Bivard in Journal of Endovascular Therapy</p

    sj-docx-1-eso-10.1177_23969873221150022 – Supplemental material for European Stroke Organisation (ESO) expedited recommendation on tenecteplase for acute ischaemic stroke

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-eso-10.1177_23969873221150022 for European Stroke Organisation (ESO) expedited recommendation on tenecteplase for acute ischaemic stroke by Sonia Alamowitch, Guillaume Turc, Lina Palaiodimou, Andrew Bivard, Alan Cameron, Gian Marco De Marchis, Annette Fromm, Janika Kõrv, Melinda B Roaldsen, Aristeidis H Katsanos and Georgios Tsivgoulis in European Stroke Journal</p

    sj-docx-1-wso-10.1177_17474930221138707 – Supplemental material for Poor collateral flow with severe hypoperfusion explains worse outcome in acute stroke patients with atrial fibrillation

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-wso-10.1177_17474930221138707 for Poor collateral flow with severe hypoperfusion explains worse outcome in acute stroke patients with atrial fibrillation by Jianhong Yang, Yuefei Wu, Xiang Gao, Qing Shang, Yao Xu, Qing Han, Jichuan Li, Chushuang Chen, Andrew Bivard, Mark W Parsons and Longting Lin in International Journal of Stroke</p

    WSO884529 Supplemetal Material - Supplemental material for Comparing mismatch strategies for patients being considered for ischemic stroke tenecteplase trials

    No full text
    Supplemental material, WSO884529 Supplemetal Material for Comparing mismatch strategies for patients being considered for ischemic stroke tenecteplase trials by Andrew Bivard, Xuya Huang, Christopher R Levi, Bruce CV Campbell, Bharath K Cheripelli, Chushuang Chen, Dheeraj Kalladka, Fiona C Moreton, Ian Ford, Stephen M Davis, Geoffrey A Donnan, Keith W Muir and Mark W Parsons in International Journal of Stroke</p

    sj-docx-1-eso-10.1177_23969873231165086 – Supplemental material for Cost-effectiveness of tenecteplase versus alteplase for stroke thrombolysis evaluation trial in the ambulance

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-eso-10.1177_23969873231165086 for Cost-effectiveness of tenecteplase versus alteplase for stroke thrombolysis evaluation trial in the ambulance by Lan Gao, Mark Parsons, Leonid Churilov, Henry Zhao, Bruce CV Campbell, Bernard Yan, Peter Mitchell, Skye Coote, Francesca Langenberg, Karen Smith, David Anderson, Michael Stephenson, Stephen M Davis, Geoffrey Donnan, Damien Easton and Andrew Bivard in European Stroke Journal</p

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore