1,721,323 research outputs found
Andrea Romano, « Legum doctores » e cultura giuridica nella Sicilia Aragonese. Tendenze, opere, ruoli
No full textBresc Henri. Andrea Romano, « Legum doctores » e cultura giuridica nella Sicilia Aragonese. Tendenze, opere, ruoli. In: Annales. Economies, sociétés, civilisations. 43ᵉ année, N. 4, 1988. pp. 934-936
Andrea Romano, Giuristi Siciliani dell'età Aragonese. Berardo Medico. Guglielmo Perno, Gualtiero Paterno, Pietro Pitrolo
No full textVerger Jacques. Andrea Romano, Giuristi Siciliani dell'età Aragonese. Berardo Medico. Guglielmo Perno, Gualtiero Paterno, Pietro Pitrolo. In: Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations. 35ᵉ année, N. 5, 1980. pp. 1076-1077
Andrea Romano, Giuristi Siciliani dell'età Aragonese. Berardo Medico. Guglielmo Perno, Gualtiero Paterno, Pietro Pitrolo
No full textVerger Jacques. Andrea Romano, Giuristi Siciliani dell'età Aragonese. Berardo Medico. Guglielmo Perno, Gualtiero Paterno, Pietro Pitrolo. In: Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations. 35ᵉ année, N. 5, 1980. pp. 1076-1077
Reading St. Peter’s Basilica. Truth and Reconstruction
No full textThe narrative surrounding San Pietro has been subject to extensive scholarly scrutiny, offering diverse interpretations through its rich history of graphical and literary dissemination. This intertwining of architecture and text extends the philological concept of an “original” text to architectural entities, prompting critical assessments of individual projects and their alignment with original intentions. This reflection suggests that architecture, like textual narratives, can embody idealized representations. At the heart of San Pietro’s construction narrative are two central figures: Michelangelo Buonarroti, advocate of the seminal design proposal, and Tiberio Alfarano, historian striving to immortalize the imagery of the antique basilica amid demolition. Michelangelo’s pursuit of architectural authenticity contrasts with Alfarano’s endeavor to reconstruct the lost narrative of the former San Pietro, reflecting an interplay between historical retrospection and forward-thinking design. San Pietro serves as a historical exemplar, illustrating how architectural truth is established retrospectively and prospectively, shaping historiography through graphical and textual mediums. This discourse underscores two key tenets: the tangible benchmark of actualized architecture versus the potential of future realizations, and the challenge of reconstructing demolished history amidst fragmented narratives. In the endeavor to reconstruct the Basilica of San Pietro, scholars must navigate a multitude of sources spanning temporal progression, confronting fundamental questions about architectural historiography, demonstrating the need of symbiotic relationship between truth and dynamism in understanding and interpreting architectural heritage
sj-pdf-2-msj-10.1177_13524585211040222 – Supplemental material for ADEM after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine: A case report
No full textSupplemental material, sj-pdf-2-msj-10.1177_13524585211040222 for ADEM after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine: A case report by Virginia Rinaldi, Gianmarco Bellucci, Andrea Romano, Alessandro Bozzao and Marco Salvetti in Multiple Sclerosis Journal</p
sj-pdf-1-msj-10.1177_13524585211040222 – Supplemental material for ADEM after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine: A case report
No full textSupplemental material, sj-pdf-1-msj-10.1177_13524585211040222 for ADEM after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine: A case report by Virginia Rinaldi, Gianmarco Bellucci, Andrea Romano, Alessandro Bozzao and Marco Salvetti in Multiple Sclerosis Journal</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
