28 research outputs found
Peran Forum Koordinasi Pimpinan Daerah dalam Penyelenggaraan Otonomi Khusus di Provinsi DKI Jakarta
No full textThe role of the Regional Leadership Coordination Forum (Forkopimda), so far has been more of a coordination forum that discussed problems in the region. The discussion was carried out in a form of meetings that were usually held in the local government office. The problems discussed are usually around the development of the last situation that occurred in the region. Other discussions usually depend on the theme or material of the discussion delivered by the Regional Head, which is then asked for advice from other Forkopinda members. In its development, it turned out that in addition to forums that were coordinating and discussing, it turned out that there were several activities in the field involving Forkopinda elements other than the Regional Head, in the form of handling social problems and natural disasters that were handled directly by TNI agencies and Polri agencies, even other institutions. who may not belong to Forkopinda.In addition to that role, Forkopinda, often also plays a role in the issue of public order, handling social conflicts, drug problems, population problems and family planning and foreign supervision problems.All of these problems require cross-sectoral coordination or coordination between vertical agencies in the region
KONSEP DAN IMPLEMENTASI IDEOLOGI PANCASILA DALAM PERUMUSAN KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAHAN
No full textABSTRAKPancasila yang telah disepakati oleh rakyat Indonesia sebagai ideologi negara dalam mengatur kehidupan berbangsa dan bernegara seringkali menghadapi berbagai tantangan dan ujian pada situasi sosial-politik dan kondisi zaman yang terus berubah. Sebagai ideologi terbuka, Pancasila menyiratkan bahwa nilai-nilai dasar Pancasila diharapkan dapat berkembang dan membentuk dasar perumusan kebijakan pemerintah sesuai dengan dinamika kehidupan masyarakat dan bangsa untuk mencapai tujuan negara. Dalam praktik negara dan pemerintahan sejak orde lama, orde baru dan era reformasi, nilai-nilai filosofis Pancasila yang ada dipandang belum cukup untuk memiliki indeks penilaian untuk diimplementasikan dalam operasionalisasi aturan dalam merumuskan kebijakan pemerintahan, di mana interpretasi nilai-nilai Pancasila selalu berbeda -Berbeda dalam merumuskan kebijakan pemerintahan untuk setiap rezim pemerintah. Bahkan Pancasila selalu hanya digunakan sebagai “jargon” oleh setiap rezim yang berkuasa dalam mempertahankan kekuasaannya terhadap pihak-pihak yang kritis atau tidak sejalan dengan politik rezim yang berkuasa. Akibatnya, Pancasila selalu kehilangan esensinya, karena setiap rezim pemerintahan selalu membangun wacana sendiri tentang esensi makna Pancasila, yang disesuaikan dengan kepentingan politiknya. Bahkan dalam masa-masa reformasi di Indonesia sejak 1998, Indonesia telah menjadi negara “Pancasila” yang berkedok Kapitalisme Liberal. Penerapan kebijakan pemerintahan neoliberal tidak pernah dipertanyakan, apakah sesuai atau tidak dengan nilai-nilai Pancasila. Meskipun kemudian, masalah otoriterisme gaya baru dankorupsi gaya baru di era liberal muncul, sekali lagi nilai dan makna Pancasila kembali diinterrpretasikan untuk mengadaptasi sistem kapitalisme liberal saat ini. Metode dengan proses koalisi antara eksekutif dan partai politik di legislatif ditambah dengan dukungan “politik” dari pemegang modal kapitalis melahirkan koalisi untuk mengamankan kepentingan masing-masing, sebagai akibat dari legislatif dan eksekutif (Presiden) yang dipilih langsung oleh rakyat sebagai perwakilan dari kekuasaan pemegang pemerintahan menjadi tidak efektif dalam menjamin kesejahteraan rakyat karena konflik kekuasaanpemerintah dengan kepentingan kapitalis yang telah mendukungnya. Lalu di manakah konsep dan implementasi keadilan sosial untuk seluruh rakyat Indonesia?
Kata kunci: ideologi Pancasila, kebijakan pemerintahanABSTRACTThe Pancasila that has been agreed upon by the Indonesian people as a state ideology in regulating the life of the nation and state always experiences challenges and tests on the socio-political situation and the conditions of the times which are constantly changing. As an open ideology, Pancasila implies that the basic values of Pancasila are expected to be developed and form the basis of formulating government policies in accordance with the dynamics of life in society and nation to achieve the goals of the country. In the practice of state and government since the old order, the new order and the reform order, the existing philosophical values of Pancasila are considered not enough to have an assessment index to be implemented in the operationalization of rules in formulating government policies, where the interpretation of Pancasila values is always different -different in formulating government policies for each government regime. Even Pancasila is always only used as a “jargon” by every regime in power in maintaining its power against parties that are critical or not in line with the politics of the ruling regime. As a result, Pancasila always loses its essence, because every government regime always builds its own discourse about the essence of the meaning of Pancasila, which is adjusted to its political interests. Even in the course of reform in Indonesia since 1998, Indonesia has become a “Pancasila” state under the guise of Liberal Capitalism. The application of neoliberal government policy has never been questioned, whether it is appropriate or not with the values of Pancasila. Even though later, the problem of new style authoritarianism and new style corruption in the liberal era arose, again the value and meaning of Pancasila was again interpreted to adapt the current liberal capitalism system.. The method with the coalition process between the executive and political party parties in the legislature coupled with “political” support of capitalist holders of capital gave birth to a coalition to secure the interests of each party, as a result of the legislative and executive (President) directly elected by the people as representatives of government power holders, become ineffective, in guaranteeing the welfare of the people because of the hostility of government power with the interests of capitalists who have supported it. Then where is the concept and implementation of social justice for all Indonesian people ....?
Keywords: Pancasila ideology, government polic
DINAMIKA KEMUNGKINAN PERUBAHAN STATUS MENJADI DESA DI KELURAHAN CIMAHPAR KECAMATAN BOGOR UTARA KOTA BOGOR
No full textVillages that have a very strategic role and position in national development and resilience because most of the Indonesian people are in the countryside. Realizing a strong village will directly affect the realization of regional autonomy because the village government is the leading unit in the service to the community and becomes strategic for the success of governance. With the issuance of Law No. 6 of 2014 concerning Village, opening up space for changes in status and institutions, changes in the status of village-kelurahan or vice versa, villages which have implications for the institutional dynamics of government in the villageChanges in the implementation of village governance are manifested in changes in the institutions of the village government - villages that have different service behaviors. Meanwhile, the phenomenon of changes in village governance still leaves the dynamics of the current village government institutions, whether the village government is a community comunity organization that carries out government functions or basic government is an autonomous region as part of the system and structure of governance in Indonesia. It is different with the position of the Kalurahan as a more stable area of urban society, because the village is an institution of regional government as part of the District Device Organization (Government Regulation No. 18 of 2016 concerning regional apparatus article 52), which is authorized to carry out government activities, empowerment community and provide community services in order to assist or carry out some of the tasks of the cama
MAKNA OTONOMI DAERAH DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN PEMERINTAHAN DAERAH PADA ERA REFORMASI
No full textABSTRACT
Since the reformation in 1998, has undergone a change in all the arrangements of state life in Indonesia. Changes that occur make the restructuring of government administration including the administration of regional government (the format of regional autonomy). The meaning of this change provides a new awareness to strengthen people’s participation and power and empower regional communities through the democratization of government and the empowerment of people’s economy. The implementation of regional autonomy is an important focal point in order to improve people’s welfare. The development of an area can be adjusted by the local government with the potential and distinctiveness of each region. So that in the implementation of local government, it is necessary to empower local communities that demand allocation and distribution of power (authority of power) and authority (authority) and discretion in the determination of public policies and the allocation of funding sources fairly between the central and regional. Therefore, the wide-ranging issue of regional autonomy has become a public debate that has pushed the change in the new format of local government into an unavoidable. Efforts to respond to these various demands by stipulating Law Number 22 of 1999 concerning Regional Government and followed by Law Number 25 of 1999 concerning Central and Regional Financial Balance. A new era of regional governance in the reform era has begun by ending a centralized era of regional government under Law Number 5 of 1974. The various principles and models adopted have given greater authority and flexibility to local governments. The new format of regional government is directed at creating regional independence by putting a principle of granting broad and complete autonomy.
Keywords: meaning, regional, autonomy, governmen
jiwbp
No full textStarting from the strategic position of the Tangerang Regency as a buffer for the Capital City of DKI Jakarta, it later developed into a part of the Greater Jakarta Metropolitan Area (Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang and Bekasi), making this region a role as a center for industry, trade and services. Then grow large-scale settlements as a new city in Tangerang Regency. The presence of the role of local government with the function of service, development and Empowerment (Ryas Rasyid, 2001), is so central as an agent of change. Moreover, the presence of these new cities left a socioeconomic impact on the surrounding community, and made extraordinary social changes for the people of Tangerang Regency. The purpose of this study is to analyze the development policies of new cities and analyze how the role of the Tangerang District Government in increasing the capability of the community in tackling the impacts of new city development and social change in the Tangerang Regency. So by using a qualitative research methodology that uses descriptive analysis techniques Triaguasi namely a combination of interviews, documentation and observations carried out continuously, then analyzed so that this study can make conclusions (conclusions, drawings / verivication) and recommendations as a research suggestion.The results of this study conclude that the construction of new cities in Tangerang Regency only increases economic growth, not equity. The quality of human resources affected by the new city is still lagging behind, namely the development of the city, not for the welfare of the surrounding community. Although the role of the local government in empowering the affected people’s economy to improve the capabilities of the community is already strong enough with diverse efforts. As a result, the construction of new cities radically changed community institutions, social systems and patterns of community behavior. New city development presents global culture in Tangerang Regency, Banten Province.Berawal dari posisi strategis Kabupaten Tangerang sebagai penyangga Ibukota DKI Jakarta, kemudian berkembang menjadi bagian dari Megapolitan Jabodetabek (Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang dan Bekasi), menjadikan daerah ini berperan sebagai pusat Industri, perdagangan dan jasa. Maka tumbulah pemukiman-pemukiman berskala besar sebagai kota baru di Kabupaten Tangerang ini. Hadirnya peran pemerintah daerah dengan fungsi pelayanan, pembangunan dan Pemberdayaan (Ryas Rasyid, 2001), begitu sentral sebagai agen perubahan. Terlebih, kehadiran kota-kota baru tersebut menyisakan dampak sosial ekonomi bagi masyarakat sekitarnya, dan membuat perubahan sosial yang luar biasa bagi masyarakat Kabupaten Tangerang. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis kebijakan pembangunan kotabaru-kota baru dan menganalisis bagaimana peran Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Tangerang dalam meningkatkan kapabilitas masyarakat dalam menanggulangi dampak pembangunan kota baru serta perubahan sosial di Kabupaten Tangerang. Sehingga dengan menggunakan metodologi penelitian kualitatif yang menggunakan deskriftif dengan teknik analisis Triaguasi yaitu perpaduan wawacara, dokumentasi dan observasi yang dilakukan secara terus menerus, kemudian dianalisis sehingga kajian ini dapat dibuat penarikan kesimpulan (conclusion, drawing/verivication) dan rekomendasi sebagai sebuah saran penelitian.Hasil kajian ini memberikan kesimpulan bahwa pembangunan kota baru di Kabupaten Tangerang hanya menaikkan pertumbuhan ekonomi, bukan pemerataan. Kualitas sumber daya manusia masyarakat terdampak kota baru masih tertinggal yaitu pembangunan kota beru bukan untuk kesejahtraan masyarakat sekitar. Walaupun peran pemerintah daerah dalam pemberdayaan ekonomi masyarakat yang terdampak untuk meningkatkan kapabilitas masyarakat sudah cukup kuat dengan upaya yang beragam. Walhasil, pembagunan kota baru berubah secara radikal kelembagaan masyarakat, sistem sosial dan pola perilaku masyarakat. Pembangunan kota baru menghadirkan kulturasi global di Kabupaten Tangerang Provinsi Banten
